ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
weatherguy425
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX > Lubbock, TX > Savannah, GA
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1921 Postby weatherguy425 » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:10 am

tolakram wrote:
weatherguy425 wrote:
I must clarify. I am not asking why he changed it. You said it was changed. I see no significant change from his previous discussion. He is a very sound meteorologist with a history in the energy industry.


I'm watching his WeatherBell members only video where he changed track from his last twitter post. Unfortunately he has not tweeted his latest track so I can't post it here.


No offense is intended, but my point was that there seems to be a lot of focus on individual model runs and it truly very subtle shifts in forecast consensus. There also seems to be some criticism of professional meteorologists and I just did not feel it was warranted.
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1922 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:16 am

FireRat wrote:Just saw the latest NAM talked about in the tropical tidbits, wow that is unreal. Good thing this is an outlier and not the best intensity model haha...
Cat 5 Landfall in South Texas late on 8/25, Holy S*** Batman!


Yup and that was with the 3km ultra high resolution model.
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1923 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:17 am

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:
FireRat wrote:Just saw the latest NAM talked about in the tropical tidbits, wow that is unreal. Good thing this is an outlier and not the best intensity model haha...
Cat 5 Landfall in South Texas late on 8/25, Holy S*** Batman!


Yup and that was with the 3km ultra high resolution model.

Lol if that happened the Texas coast wouldn't exist !
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1924 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:18 am

Portastorm wrote:Hmmm ... 12z guidance shows models shifting SW again. Looking forward to seeing NHC's thoughts at 10.


The intensity guidance still mostly TS strength up to landfall... Also Looking forward...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1925 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:33 am

Models thread folks, let's stick to model runs. :)
3 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1926 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:34 am

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:
FireRat wrote:Just saw the latest NAM talked about in the tropical tidbits, wow that is unreal. Good thing this is an outlier and not the best intensity model haha...
Cat 5 Landfall in South Texas late on 8/25, Holy S*** Batman!


Yup and that was with the 3km ultra high resolution model.

Never said i buy the the run. Just saying that ultra high meso model had a f3/4 vort.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1927 Postby Steve » Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:41 am

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:
Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:
FireRat wrote:Just saw the latest NAM talked about in the tropical tidbits, wow that is unreal. Good thing this is an outlier and not the best intensity model haha...
Cat 5 Landfall in South Texas late on 8/25, Holy S*** Batman!


Yup and that was with the 3km ultra high resolution model.

Never said i buy the the run. Just saying that ultra high meso model had a f3/4 vort.


That's right. And we were knocking it last night because it's just not worth much effort in following it with anything that far south. For entertainment purposes though, that's a spectacular run as was the 00z which I think got down to the 890's and the 18z which I think was the like 923. Death, doom and destruction with the 3km NAM!
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1928 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:02 am

Haven't seen a model image posted in this thread in a while, here is the 12Z guidance:

Image
Image
1 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1929 Postby ROCK » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:09 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1930 Postby Steve » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:55 am

NAM 12z's are running and are now completed. Here are the run downs:

3km (only goes out to 60 hours) still taking it into Cat 4 or Cat 5 territory with a hit on South Padre Island. No end game because it only goes out 2 1/2 days. I like the track well enough on this but clearly not the intensity.

12km approaching the Golden Triangle without ever having landfalled in Texas at 969 and intensifying. Mostly a hair west of due north movement on this through 81 hours with a north fade and then a clip NE/ENE at the very end looking like a landfall eventually in Cameron or Vermilion Parish Louisiana.

32km does about the same thing (now out to 84 hours) with a decidedly eastern component at the end. This looks like it would landfall in SW LA but probably somewhere between Lafayette and Houma (Vermillion and Terrebonne Bays). But you can't be sure it doesn't hug the coast and go in farther east because it only goes out to 84 hours. No landfall on this run either. 965mb at the end of run so making a push for Higher end Cat 2 and still looking like a beast.
Last edited by Steve on Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1931 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:18 am

Steve wrote:NAM 12z's are running and are now completed. Here are the run downs:

3km (only goes out to 60 hours) still taking it into Cat 4 or Cat 5 territory with a hit on South Padre Island. No end game because it only goes out 2 1/2 days. I like the track well enough on this but clearly not the intensity.

12km approaching the Golden Triangle without ever having landfilled in Texas at 969 and intensifying. Mostly a hair west of due north movement on this through 81 hours with a north fade and then a clip NE/ENE at the very end looking like a landfall eventually in Cameron or Vermilion Parish Louisiana.

32km does about the same thing (now out to 84 hours) with a decidedly eastern component at the end. This looks like it would landfall in SW LA but probably somewhere between Lafayette and Houma (Vermillion and Terrebonne Bays). But you can't be sure it doesn't hug the coast and go in farther east because it only goes out to 84 hours. No landfall on this run either. 965mb at the end of run so making a push for Higher end Cat 2 and still looking like a beast.


The 12z 12km NAM scares the crap out of me keeping it offshore and pointing towards LA as a strong cane. Several EURO ensembles show this possibility as well.
2 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1932 Postby stormreader » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:18 am

Steve wrote:NAM 12z's are running and are now completed. Here are the run downs:

3km (only goes out to 60 hours) still taking it into Cat 4 or Cat 5 territory with a hit on South Padre Island. No end game because it only goes out 2 1/2 days. I like the track well enough on this but clearly not the intensity.

12km approaching the Golden Triangle without ever having landfilled in Texas at 969 and intensifying. Mostly a hair west of due north movement on this through 81 hours with a north fade and then a clip NE/ENE at the very end looking like a landfall eventually in Cameron or Vermilion Parish Louisiana.

32km does about the same thing (now out to 84 hours) with a decidedly eastern component at the end. This looks like it would landfall in SW LA but probably somewhere between Lafayette and Houma (Vermillion and Terrebonne Bays). But you can't be sure it doesn't hug the coast and go in farther east because it only goes out to 84 hours. No landfall on this run either. 965mb at the end of run so making a push for Higher end Cat 2 and still looking like a beast.

Thanks Steve. Really been following the NAM posts because it was one of the outlier models closest to my thinking. It kept the storm just offshore of the Texas coast. At the time it had landfall near Tex-La border which has been my thinking. Apparently, new run is still off the Texas coast, but now it shows a bend east late, further east than thought into SW La at least. I think that is very feasible.
1 likes   

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 508
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1933 Postby hohnywx » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:22 am

PTrackerLA wrote:
Steve wrote:NAM 12z's are running and are now completed. Here are the run downs:

3km (only goes out to 60 hours) still taking it into Cat 4 or Cat 5 territory with a hit on South Padre Island. No end game because it only goes out 2 1/2 days. I like the track well enough on this but clearly not the intensity.

12km approaching the Golden Triangle without ever having landfilled in Texas at 969 and intensifying. Mostly a hair west of due north movement on this through 81 hours with a north fade and then a clip NE/ENE at the very end looking like a landfall eventually in Cameron or Vermilion Parish Louisiana.

32km does about the same thing (now out to 84 hours) with a decidedly eastern component at the end. This looks like it would landfall in SW LA but probably somewhere between Lafayette and Houma (Vermillion and Terrebonne Bays). But you can't be sure it doesn't hug the coast and go in farther east because it only goes out to 84 hours. No landfall on this run either. 965mb at the end of run so making a push for Higher end Cat 2 and still looking like a beast.


The 12z 12km NAM scares the crap out of me keeping it offshore and pointing towards LA as a strong cane. Several EURO ensembles show this possibility as well.


I know it's easier to say from outside of the crosshairs, but I would not let the NAM worry you all too much. It is a terrible tropical forecasting model. If other models start trending that way, then I would start to take it more seriously.
3 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1934 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:30 am

12Z GFS running

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1935 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:33 am

Image
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1936 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:33 am

1mb stronger and a tad SW of last run.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1937 Postby Steve » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:36 am

hohnywx wrote:
PTrackerLA wrote:
Steve wrote:NAM 12z's are running and are now completed. Here are the run downs:

3km (only goes out to 60 hours) still taking it into Cat 4 or Cat 5 territory with a hit on South Padre Island. No end game because it only goes out 2 1/2 days. I like the track well enough on this but clearly not the intensity.

12km approaching the Golden Triangle without ever having landfilled in Texas at 969 and intensifying. Mostly a hair west of due north movement on this through 81 hours with a north fade and then a clip NE/ENE at the very end looking like a landfall eventually in Cameron or Vermilion Parish Louisiana.

32km does about the same thing (now out to 84 hours) with a decidedly eastern component at the end. This looks like it would landfall in SW LA but probably somewhere between Lafayette and Houma (Vermillion and Terrebonne Bays). But you can't be sure it doesn't hug the coast and go in farther east because it only goes out to 84 hours. No landfall on this run either. 965mb at the end of run so making a push for Higher end Cat 2 and still looking like a beast.


The 12z 12km NAM scares the crap out of me keeping it offshore and pointing towards LA as a strong cane. Several EURO ensembles show this possibility as well.


I know it's easier to say from outside of the crosshairs, but I would not let the NAM worry you all too much. It is a terrible tropical forecasting model. If other models start trending that way, then I would start to take it more seriously.


Agreed 100%, and I've been downplaying it the last 3 days because the system is too far south. It barely gets into range on the 3km (which southern range is 25N). I think the scary side of it for people is that it partially succeeded with Cindy which was the last storm in that area a month or two ago, and also because it has more or less been decent with the spin from Harvey and how it would react coming off the W/NW Yucatan and taking its time a little farther south to coalesce than what the big globals were doing - except 3km which is like someone dropped nitroglycerine into it. No way that happens, and I don't think anyone would disagree with that. GFS now running.
2 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1938 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:38 am

Well west now.

Image
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1939 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:39 am

GFS has definitely shifted west on the 12Z and looks weaker.

Image
2 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20011
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1940 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:41 am

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests