ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3021 Postby stormreader » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:44 am

WAcyclone wrote:Does anyone know if the adjustment techniques used by CFAN are actually increasing the forecast skill? According to Jeff Master's most recent post, the adjusted ECMWF operational run (red line) takes Irma right into southern Florida. The same scenario is shown by three of the five so-called "high probability clusters" (which are probably adjusted EPS members). However, the WSW movement in the Bahamas seems very suspect to me...

Image

Source: https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/hurricane-irma-track-towards-lesser-antilles

The red line would be pretty close to the Donna scenario some of us have talked about for a couple of days now. Definitely still in play.
1 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20020
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3022 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:45 am

GFS 12z run

Image
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3023 Postby xironman » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:45 am

Tropical storm warnings for Lake Erie.
3 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1756
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3024 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:47 am

ronjon wrote:
WAcyclone wrote:Does anyone know if the adjustment techniques used by CFAN are actually increasing the forecast skill? According to Jeff Master's most recent post, the adjusted ECMWF operational run (red line) takes Irma right into southern Florida. The same scenario is shown by three of the five so-called "high probability clusters" (which are probably adjusted EPS members). However, the WSW movement in the Bahamas seems very suspect to me...



Source: https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/hurricane-irma-track-towards-lesser-antilles

It didn't work all that well with Matthew last year. Consistently showed more tracks over Florida.

If it weren't for that 30 mile E shift on Oct 6 we would have had the landfall though. But yes it was a bit too far west.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3025 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:47 am

CMC full run also makes it up to Cleveland. It's uncanny close to the GFS from an overview perspective - just a bit farther south when it comes in but same end game. CMC has it transitioning over Cleveland where GFS stil has much tighter isobars.

CMC
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=100
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3026 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:49 am

HWRF coming in stronger...now watching this with both eyes...
1 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3027 Postby stormreader » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:50 am

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
ronjon wrote:
WAcyclone wrote:Does anyone know if the adjustment techniques used by CFAN are actually increasing the forecast skill? According to Jeff Master's most recent post, the adjusted ECMWF operational run (red line) takes Irma right into southern Florida. The same scenario is shown by three of the five so-called "high probability clusters" (which are probably adjusted EPS members). However, the WSW movement in the Bahamas seems very suspect to me...



Source: https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/hurricane-irma-track-towards-lesser-antilles

It didn't work all that well with Matthew last year. Consistently showed more tracks over Florida.

If it weren't for that 30 mile E shift on Oct 6 we would have had the landfall though. But yes it was a bit too far west.

Yeah, well the whole thing with Mathew modeling was not something to write home about. Models were way too far east and the shift back west came relatively late in the forecast period. Don't know the time frame when you speak of tracks for Mathew over Fl, but hey, that was a lot closer than the operationals which clung to the hundreds of miles east of Fl for way too long.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3028 Postby Bocadude85 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:52 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:Between the CMC, the Euro, and the GFS this has all of the makings of Floyd part II. I still think the GFS is too far right in the mid term but the end result is relatively close.


Still 9-10 days out...how often does the GFS and CMC nail a 10 day forecast? The UKMET looks to be similar to the 0z Euro showing Irma heading into the Bahamas.
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3029 Postby Ken711 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:52 am

Steve wrote:CMC full run also makes it up to Cleveland. It's uncanny close to the GFS from an overview perspective - just a bit farther south when it comes in but same end game. CMC has it transitioning over Cleveland where GFS stil has much tighter isobars.

CMC
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=100


Isabel like track.
1 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3030 Postby curtadams » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:53 am

Hurricane Andrew wrote:
Steve wrote:Oh wow. There's a curveball in the end game. A hook west as a strong tropical storm heading for Pittsburgh. Not every day can Pittsburgh say they're under a tropical storm warning!

All I know is how scary it would be to be sitting on the NE coast, watching a <900mb storm barrel northwards...is that even possible for a storm this far north? I mean..I can believe 920-940mb...but 890-900?
The GFS (or any global) is not tuned to handle the detailed internal dynamics of a tropical storm. The large size of Irma at that point could be inducing it to overestimate the pressure intensity, and this forecast should be read only as "should be very strong". For meaningful estimates of extreme pressures like what Irma will almost surely have we'll have to wait for the hurricane models to get out that far (but remember they tend to be bullish).
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3031 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:53 am

HWRF-P from 06Z is more or less in line. The difference between that run and last night is that it looks like Jose instead of following Irma actually makes a run for the Caribbean. Could be trouble down the way.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=100
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3032 Postby stormreader » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:57 am

Steve wrote:HWRF-P from 06Z is more or less in line. The difference between that run and last night is that it looks like Jose instead of following Irma actually makes a run for the Caribbean. Could be trouble down the way.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=100


Interesting Steve, could be lots of trouble down the line. Possible double whammy for the states.... This board will be lit up like a Christmas tree if that verifies.
1 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3033 Postby sma10 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:57 am

I've been following GFS model runs since the GFS was born. Not to be flippant, but i literally have never seen an 8-9 day bullseye materialize (and trust me, many of those were catastrophic doozies).

I'm not an expert, but I do have considerable experience observing. I have been burned so many times by this model, I refuse to believe this scenario, even though it's repeated a couple times. If Irma does indeed make landfall it will almost certainly be someplace else (i.e. Florida, Cuba, Bermuda)
2 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11510
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3034 Postby GCANE » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:59 am

12Z GFS.
The ridge over Ontario reappears, pushing back Irma for a later landfall.
Irma goes sub 900 mb for about 18 hrs in the eastern end of the Bahamas.

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3035 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:02 pm

Also, I'd remind everyone to follow the MJO. The move into Phases 8, 1 and possibly 2 on the way back way way outside of the circle means a crazy pattern and a focus on the Western Hemisphere. FWIW, we moved into Phase 2 for Harvey.

We were talking about it during a lull in July. Absent a strong ENSO signal and with the very warm Atlantic, it seemed we could time at least a good percentage of tropical development based on the MJO this season. Problem is which runs to trust.

GFS Ensembles are bonkers with some of them wanting to go off the entire square.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/p ... ncpe.shtml

Australian model mean is a move back into Phase 2 but not as extreme as GFS Ensembles are into 8 and 1.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/p ... bomm.shtml

ECMF shows a weak signal inside the circle.

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/p ... ecmf.shtml
Last edited by Steve on Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
4 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3036 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:02 pm

HWRF is significantly stronger...note that we are still in the D8-D10+ range for US impacts...on the other hand, Irma will be crossing over the NE Caribbean islands in D4-D5...so we are getting closer.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1756
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3037 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:04 pm

sma10 wrote:I've been following GFS model runs since the GFS was born. Not to be flippant, but i literally have never seen an 8-9 day bullseye materialize (and trust me, many of those were catastrophic doozies).

I'm not an expert, but I do have considerable experience observing. I have been burned so many times by this model, I refuse to believe this scenario, even though it's repeated a couple times. If Irma does indeed make landfall it will almost certainly be someplace else (i.e. Florida, Cuba, Bermuda)

That's what I'm worried about. I'd rather the GFS wipe us off the map 4 times a day than miss us 4 times a day 5-10 days out.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3038 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:06 pm

sma10 wrote:I've been following GFS model runs since the GFS was born. Not to be flippant, but i literally have never seen an 8-9 day bullseye materialize (and trust me, many of those were catastrophic doozies).

I'm not an expert, but I do have considerable experience observing. I have been burned so many times by this model, I refuse to believe this scenario, even though it's repeated a couple times. If Irma does indeed make landfall it will almost certainly be someplace else (i.e. Florida, Cuba, Bermuda)


Agreed 100%. However, as bad as GFS and ECMWF have been in the mid-range this year in my opinion, we are now at about 8 days with GFS landfalling sometime in the Sunday Night-Tuesday AM time period. Anything can and will happen with the modeling between now and then. It's just so unfortunate that the 5-6-7 day runs have been whack, because that's where we're headed until Tuesday when we get to and probably inside of 5 days. It's watch the evolution of the models time for now.
2 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4239
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3039 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:07 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:Between the CMC, the Euro, and the GFS this has all of the makings of Floyd part II. I still think the GFS is too far right in the mid term but the end result is relatively close.


Still 9-10 days out...how often does the GFS and CMC nail a 10 day forecast? The UKMET looks to be similar to the 0z Euro showing Irma heading into the Bahamas.


Slim to none...that's why we are so intently watching here on the SE FL coast. We still haven't had a landfall on the eastern side of the peninsula by any of the big models, save for ensembles. Quite frankly it's creeping me out.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4239
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3040 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:10 pm

HWRF is faster...A full degree west of the 06z by 63 hours.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests