ATL: HARVEY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3501 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:12 am

It looks like the best cat 2 I have ever seen. Has anyone seen better at cat 2? :?:
1 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20034
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3502 Postby tolakram » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:13 am

15:04z

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3503 Postby Blinhart » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:14 am

hd44 wrote:With ewrc in full swing this is likely to landfall as cat 2. I don't anticipate any more intensification . However impacts wont change much between 110 vs 120 mph.


From what I have been reading here EWRC is almost complete, and since this is still almost 12 hours away from having the eye make contact with the coastline plenty of time for this to go from a low end Cat 3 to a low end Cat 4.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3504 Postby gatorcane » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:14 am

NEXSAT loop has some amazing views of Harvey:

https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/nexsat-bin/ ... PE=Instant
1 likes   

hd44

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3505 Postby hd44 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:15 am

Blinhart wrote:
hd44 wrote:With ewrc in full swing this is likely to landfall as cat 2. I don't anticipate any more intensification . However impacts wont change much between 110 vs 120 mph.


From what I have been reading here EWRC is almost complete, and since this is still almost 12 hours away from having the eye make contact with the coastline plenty of time for this to go from a low end Cat 3 to a low end Cat 4.


I doubt it. I think the gfs is doing a good job depicting this with little more intensification.
1 likes   

jaguars_22
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:26 pm
Location: Victoria TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3506 Postby jaguars_22 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:15 am

Going to be a long night here in Victoria i bet we don't get 100mph sustained?
0 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3507 Postby JPmia » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:16 am

tarheelprogrammer wrote:It looks like the best cat 2 I have ever seen. Has anyone seen better at cat 2? :?:


I'm sure we'll get a special advisory in the not too distant future.
0 likes   

User avatar
Longhornmaniac8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:30 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3508 Postby Longhornmaniac8 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:16 am

hd44 wrote:With ewrc in full swing this is likely to landfall as cat 2. I don't anticipate any more intensification . However impacts wont change much between 110 vs 120 mph.


Seeing as it's just about done and the environment is still favorable for additional strengthening, I think you'd be wrong with that prediction.

We shall see, though. As you said, it's not going to make a huge difference.
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4773
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3509 Postby psyclone » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:17 am

otowntiger wrote:So it sounds like there is a chance this won't make it to cat 3 status, based on what I read in the 11:00 NHC discussion. I know it certainly could strengthen and they say that, but they are leaving open the possibility that it won't which could certainly be good news for the areas directly in the path of the eyewall, I know that may not be huge in the big picture but every little bit helps. There is certainly a big difference in 110 winds vs 130 or higher. Of course as its made very clear, the biggest threat is the rain and storm surge flooding which will likely be severe regardless of its exact strength. Also another observation is that it is clearly not slowing down is also a bit of good news in that is will have less time to strengthen, and may move farther inland allowing for more weakening prior to the possible gulf re-entry. Just a couple amateur observations here.


The die has been cast. This is going to be a terrible event by any measure. people in the impact zone will be using the "pre Harvey/post Harvey" verbiage for years to come in all likelihood.
2 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3510 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:17 am

0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1704
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3511 Postby MississippiWx » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:17 am

tarheelprogrammer wrote:It looks like the best cat 2 I have ever seen. Has anyone seen better at cat 2? :?:


Gert was pretty similar.
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3512 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:19 am

MississippiWx wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:It looks like the best cat 2 I have ever seen. Has anyone seen better at cat 2? :?:


Gert was pretty similar.


Is it really common for a cyclone to undergo so many EWRCs? Seems quite odd to me. :double:
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3513 Postby Nederlander » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:19 am

hd44 wrote:With ewrc in full swing this is likely to landfall as cat 2. I don't anticipate any more intensification . However impacts wont change much between 110 vs 120 mph.

ERC looks to be nearly complete.. still plenty of time to intensify further as it doesn't appear that the ERC weakened the storm at all.. NHC still calling for 120mph at landfall so we will see, but like you said, it's just splitting hairs on whether it will be deemed a "major".
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20034
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3514 Postby tolakram » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:19 am

hd44 wrote:
I doubt it. I think the gfs is doing a good job depicting this with little more intensification.



So you are expecting a 952mb cat 2? HWRF, which has done well, has it down to 947mb before rising just before landfall. I expect a low end cat 3, seems reasonable given the presentation, but more is not out of the question if the erc finishes soon.
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1924
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3515 Postby otowntiger » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:19 am

stephen23 wrote:
otowntiger wrote:So it sounds like there is a chance this won't make it to cat 3 status, based on what I read in the 11:00 NHC discussion. I know it certainly could strengthen and they say that, but they are leaving open the possibility that it won't which could certainly be good news for the areas directly in the path of the eyewall, I know that may not be huge in the big picture but every little bit helps. There is certainly a big difference in 110 winds vs 130 or higher. Of course as its made very clear, the biggest threat is the rain and storm surge flooding which will likely be severe regardless of its exact strength. Also another observation is that it is clearly not slowing down is also a bit of good news in that is will have less time to strengthen, and may move farther inland allowing for more weakening prior to the possible gulf re-entry. Just a couple amateur observations here.


Not sure what the difference is in 1mph to make this less dangerous. Storm is 110mph. Cat 3 is 111mph
yeah, the reference to the difference between cat 2 and 3 going from 110 to 111 isn't significant I get that. That would be more a technical/historic perspective. If it makes landfall at 110 there will still be that narrative that a 'major' hasn't hit the US in 12 years, etc. But the earlier predictions by the NHC and certainly some of the models had this closer to 130 and while it may not sound like it 20mph difference is a big jump. The force increases exponentially as I understand it. Anyway I acknowledge that this will be a serious storm regardless but like I said every little bit helps. slight track differences, wind speed, storm structure, forward speed can all work together to have an impact for the better or worse.
0 likes   

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3516 Postby stephen23 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:21 am

Not sure why some are saying this won't reach Cat 3. There is still What, 18 hrs before landfall? It is at 110mph right now. Cat 3 is 111 mph. The eye wall replacement cycle is just about done. You'd have to be the best hurricane forecaster in human history to be certain this thing couldnt gain 1mph in intensity over the next 18 hrs. It just takes one single reading to show a 1mph increase and we have a Cat 3
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

hd44

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3517 Postby hd44 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:21 am

tarheelprogrammer wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:It looks like the best cat 2 I have ever seen. Has anyone seen better at cat 2? :?:


Gert was pretty similar.


Is it really common for a cyclone to undergo so many EWRCs? Seems quite odd to me. :double:


Katrina underwent a lot of EWRC . It got really intense after one. The second one is when it approached shore and couldn't intensify anymore... though you could argue the shear increased too.
1 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1795
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3518 Postby hurricaneCW » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:22 am

There is no good news with Harvey, I still think he will reach Cat 4 status prior to landfall as the winds are still trying to catch up.

This will very likely be one of the biggest if not the biggest natural disaster in US history.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3519 Postby NDG » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:22 am

Pressure started dropping again.

151600 2643N 09603W 6970 02666 9438 +165 +135 208025 035 020 001 03
3 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3520 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:23 am

The last few images from radar showing the inner eyewall has collpased only very shallow remnants remain barely enough to give returns on radar. eye should begin to clear out even more on sat and deepening likely to follow.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests