ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6601 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:33 pm

Quite a fewImage

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
0 likes   

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 435
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6602 Postby mcheer23 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:33 pm

HMON is going way overboard with intensity 232 mph....Just no. Lol.
1 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4745
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6603 Postby psyclone » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:33 pm

Alyono wrote:Canadian has landfall at PENSACOLA. Massive westward shift


That will awaken some folks. Do you think that's a reasonable solution?
1 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 24
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6604 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:33 pm

SouthFLTropics wrote:That's a huge shift in one run by the CMC. How has the CMC been performing with this system so far? I'd have to guess that it isn't up there with the Euro. Regardless, it's one of the consensus models and that huge of an outlier would throw the TVCN off I would think.

Early on it followed the GFS with a re curve before the islands. It has shifted east and west day after day. Not the most consistent so far.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6605 Postby tolakram » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:33 pm

NDG wrote:
tolakram wrote:
NDG wrote:There would be very little left of the middle and upper Keys if this GFS was to be correct :(

[i mg]https://i.imgur.com/I4sJzrY.png[/img]


Please stop the dramatics. Sorry, but while this may be a large and dangerous storm the talk of utter destruction is a little over the top. Whoever gets the right eyewall is going to be hurting for sure but these GFS super low pressures cannot be believed.


Is not dramatics. At this point anything is possible, just a couple of days ago many were dismissing the idea Irma being almost a Cat 5 tonight.
Next time please PM me, I am not a little kid.


Going to leave this out here because I'm just not sure where to draw the line.

Sure, it's possible, and the UKMET does show pressure drops at the end of it's run. I'm trying to balance a real threat with fear mongering, not an easy thing to do post Harvey and the disaster it caused. The GFS has been dead wrong on these super low pressures ever since the upgrade so I think it's safe to ignore it unless another model agrees. Right now 920 looks reasonable, which is strong enough!
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6606 Postby eastcoastFL » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:34 pm

AdamFirst wrote:Image

SFWMD spaghetti plot includes new UKMET. I guess you can consider that to be an eastern outlier now. :roll:



It's looking tougher for Florida to dodge Irma somehow. Still a chance though albeit a very slim chance.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6607 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:34 pm

Call me a skeptical if you want but I have a hard time believing the radical north turn and the complete Florida peninsula direct hit scenario. Like I stated before if the models are showing this on Wed. then I would be very concerned in Fl. I will say though with every run it seems as though it slowly nudges landfall further west. Which would be concerning to the folks in the panhandle area of Florida. IMO
2 likes   

MrJames
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Jax, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6608 Postby MrJames » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:34 pm

Wow, CMC went from a S FL plus NC hit to the panhandle. So from an outlier to an outlier. It looked at the UK Met and said hold my beer.
3 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6609 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:34 pm

psyclone wrote:
Alyono wrote:Canadian has landfall at PENSACOLA. Massive westward shift


That will awaken some folks. Do you think that's a reasonable solution?


absolutely not
4 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6610 Postby sma10 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:34 pm

The good news about trying to verify whether the CMC is out to lunch, is that there are significant differences with GFS early. As soon as early tomorrow afternoon the CMC is running way out in front of the GFS.
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6611 Postby SoupBone » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:34 pm

To what degree does intensity affect path in the models? Also, what's the initial landfall timeline?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6612 Postby MississippiWx » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:35 pm

CMC doesn't really develop the upper level low over the Central Gulf States. It just maintains a weakness over the Central Gulf Coast rather than developing an all out upper level low that is able to direct Irma up into Florida. Upper level low remains the key.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6613 Postby SFLcane » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:36 pm

Thx for clearing that up Alyono..
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6614 Postby bamajammer4eva » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:36 pm

Wouldn't this map be better for wind speeds inland than 850mb level? The surface winds maps on tropical tidbits always look way underdone but being this storm is so deep this may be closer.

Image
Last edited by bamajammer4eva on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6615 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:36 pm

Image
Explains its self.
1 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6616 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:36 pm

So you are saying there is no way Irma can hit Pensacola?


Alyono wrote:
psyclone wrote:
Alyono wrote:Canadian has landfall at PENSACOLA. Massive westward shift


That will awaken some folks. Do you think that's a reasonable solution?


absolutely not
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6617 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:38 pm

I don't know about that major south shift of the CMC over Cuba. Hard to buy into that with the incredible consistency from the Euro and GFS. It might be a foretaste though of a stronger west ridge which could guide Irma through the Straits and farther out over the Gulf. Trying to make some sense of it.
0 likes   

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6618 Postby bella_may » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:38 pm

HWRF is straight wnw into the SE GOM. Too bad the model doesn't go out further
0 likes   

caneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1446
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 am
Location: Clearwater Beach, Fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6619 Postby caneman » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:39 pm

MrJames wrote:Wow, CMC went from a S FL plus NC hit to the panhandle. So from an outlier to an outlier. It looked at the UK Met and said hold my beer.


The CMC
Shouldn't be taken seriously with Irma. It's been all over the place. If other more reliable models showed that, I'd maybe worry then. For now, the GFS and Euro seem to be most reliable and operate almost in tandem. When the 2 more reliable models do that, you hve.to weight more heavily towards them.
Last edited by caneman on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15445
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6620 Postby NDG » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:39 pm

Alyono wrote:
psyclone wrote:
Alyono wrote:Canadian has landfall at PENSACOLA. Massive westward shift


That will awaken some folks. Do you think that's a reasonable solution?


absolutely not


Yeah, at this point it would be hard to believe the CMC when it was so left biased with Harvey.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests