ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7621 Postby Vdogg » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:43 pm


Looking at that loop, I just don't see this hitting Cuba. It's gaining too much latitude. The NHC official says the storm is moving west, but by their own recon it's been moving WNW for hours now. I just don't get it.
1 likes   

MatthewsRevenge

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7622 Postby MatthewsRevenge » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:45 pm

Vdogg wrote:

Looking at that loop, I just don't see this hitting Cuba. It's gaining too much latitude. The NHC official says the storm is moving west, but by their own recon it's been moving WNW for hours now. I just don't get it.


They wanna be on the safe side for now. It's still far away from making the US for now. Unless you think it will collide with Jose? Lol
0 likes   

caneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 am
Location: Clearwater Beach, Fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7623 Postby caneman » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:46 pm

Really need to wait for NOAA data at 5. Looks like one on East coast and one on West coast so for now, up the spine seems reasonable
Last edited by caneman on Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7624 Postby rockyman » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:46 pm

From the 11pm discussion:

Some of the dynamical
models have shifted northward a bit from the previous cycle, with
the normally reliable GFS looking like a northeast outlier. The
official track forecast leans toward the ECMWF solution. Users are
reminded to not focus on the exact forecast track, especially at the
longer ranges, since the average NHC track errors are about 175 and
225 statute miles at days 4 and 5, respectively.
3 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7625 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:48 pm

caneman wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
How do you explain the 18Z GFS ensemble mean that is significantly west of the OP run? When the ensembles don't agree with the op run that is usually a clue that there is something funky. Go through the GFS ensembles since 12z this morning..they have all be west of the op run. The NHC doesn't base their forecast off one model..they have other models available to them that are not available to the public.


Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo. The Euro was way west of its ensemble mean, as well, so by the same reasoning it should be discounted :) Yes the ensembles are west of the OP for the GFS but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s right, or wrong. I’ve seen many of these storms over the years that are forecast to make a hard right turn and usually it occurs faster and sooner than anticipated. Also, I explained why the OP run has added weight since the NAM synoptic setup concurs with the GFS and the 18z HWRF also made a significant north shift through most of its run to match that also. There is plenty of time for further adjustments but the east of Florida track is what I’ve thought would happen all along and I’m sticking with it, along with my Floyd 99 analog.


Not buying it. My understanding has always been to go with the ensembles. Further, 48 hours out on the NAM isn't far enough out. I'll go with up the spine of Florida. The Euro UKMET and TVCN had been most accurate a couple days ago but the UKIE seems to have gone wonky. So a split between Euro And TVCN seems reasonable.


Like I said, different people have different methods of forecasting. Sometimes the “best” models don’t always do the best with certain setups. Knowing how to use the tools we have, and which ones to use for different synoptic setups, is an extremely important aspect of forecasting. Euro has been pretty inconsistent with which side of Florida to take Irma, I expect tonight it will trend east.
1 likes   

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7626 Postby Vdogg » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:53 pm

MatthewsRevenge wrote:
Vdogg wrote:

Looking at that loop, I just don't see this hitting Cuba. It's gaining too much latitude. The NHC official says the storm is moving west, but by their own recon it's been moving WNW for hours now. I just don't get it.


They wanna be on the safe side for now. It's still far away from making the US for now. Unless you think it will collide with Jose? Lol

You laugh, but 2 weeks ago a storm with 50 inches of rain was crazy. 2 days ago everyone and their Grandma thought the GFS bombing this out to a high Cat 5 was crazy. Too many variables up in the air. Was the trough modeled correctly? Could Jose get big and close enough to effect this? Who knows. What I do know is there is still a stunning spread in the model consensus past 3 days.
1 likes   

invest man
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:12 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7627 Postby invest man » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:01 pm

Just saw the 11pm advisory's. Look at all 3 tropical systems. Jose looks to start moving NW Thursday night at the same time the depression in the BOC is moving East. Question would this be from hp moving the depression and the ridge breaking down for Jose? If so Thursday night thru Friday morning might be the time frame for GFS to break ranks with other models since NHC forecast seems to go more westerly. Just a thought. I also realize that they said the GFS is an outlier! IM
2 likes   

caneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 am
Location: Clearwater Beach, Fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7628 Postby caneman » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:05 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
caneman wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo. The Euro was way west of its ensemble mean, as well, so by the same reasoning it should be discounted :) Yes the ensembles are west of the OP for the GFS but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s right, or wrong. I’ve seen many of these storms over the years that are forecast to make a hard right turn and usually it occurs faster and sooner than anticipated. Also, I explained why the OP run has added weight since the NAM synoptic setup concurs with the GFS and the 18z HWRF also made a significant north shift through most of its run to match that also. There is plenty of time for further adjustments but the east of Florida track is what I’ve thought would happen all along and I’m sticking with it, along with my Floyd 99 analog.


Not buying it. My understanding has always been to go with the ensembles. Further, 48 hours out on the NAM isn't far enough out. I'll go with up the spine of Florida. The Euro UKMET and TVCN had been most accurate a couple days ago but the UKIE seems to have gone wonky. So a split between Euro And TVCN seems reasonable.


Like I said, different people have different methods of forecasting. Sometimes the “best” models don’t always do the best with certain setups. Knowing how to use the tools we have, and which ones to use for different synoptic setups, is an extremely important aspect of forecasting. Euro has been pretty inconsistent with which side of Florida to take Irma, I expect tonight it will trend east.


Read.the disco post at 11. Rockyman posted above. The NHC not putting much weight into GFS. Further, model verification actually shows Euro, NHC and UKMET being most accurate as of now. That too is posted above
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7629 Postby Frank P » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:07 pm

invest man wrote:Just saw the 11pm advisory's. Look at all 3 tropical systems. Jose looks to start moving NW Thursday night at the same time the depression in the BOC is moving East. Question would this be from hp moving the depression and the ridge breaking down for Jose? If so Thursday night thru Friday morning might be the time frame for GFS to break ranks with other models since NHC forecast seems to go more westerly. Just a thought. I also realize that they said the GFS is an outlier! IM

the depression in the GOM is not expected move east but probably less that 100 miles or so, and never gets past 95w before it turns south to mexico.. can't see it having any effect and if it did would be minimal at best...
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7630 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:07 pm

rockyman wrote:From the 11pm discussion:

Some of the dynamical
models have shifted northward a bit from the previous cycle, with
the normally reliable GFS looking like a northeast outlier. The
official track forecast leans toward the ECMWF solution. Users are
reminded to not focus on the exact forecast track, especially at the
longer ranges, since the average NHC track errors are about 175 and
225 statute miles at days 4 and 5, respectively.

Looks like the NHC is still favoring the Euro, they are not buying the more Northeastern solution.

Anyone have some insight about the trough with the Euro vs GFS right now?
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7631 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:08 pm

caneman wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
caneman wrote:
Not buying it. My understanding has always been to go with the ensembles. Further, 48 hours out on the NAM isn't far enough out. I'll go with up the spine of Florida. The Euro UKMET and TVCN had been most accurate a couple days ago but the UKIE seems to have gone wonky. So a split between Euro And TVCN seems reasonable.


Like I said, different people have different methods of forecasting. Sometimes the “best” models don’t always do the best with certain setups. Knowing how to use the tools we have, and which ones to use for different synoptic setups, is an extremely important aspect of forecasting. Euro has been pretty inconsistent with which side of Florida to take Irma, I expect tonight it will trend east.


Read.the disco post at 11. Rockyman posted above. The NHC not putting much weight into GFS. Further, model verification actually shows Euro, NHC and UKMET being most accurate as of now. That too is posted above


I saw it. They’re waiting like usual for the 00z runs with the new data, that’s completely normal for the NHC. They never jump on a band wagon early and there’s no reason for a significant track adjustment until after they see the 00z suite.
1 likes   

invest man
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:12 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7632 Postby invest man » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:08 pm

Frank P wrote:
invest man wrote:Just saw the 11pm advisory's. Look at all 3 tropical systems. Jose looks to start moving NW Thursday night at the same time the depression in the BOC is moving East. Question would this be from hp moving the depression and the ridge breaking down for Jose? If so Thursday night thru Friday morning might be the time frame for GFS to break ranks with other models since NHC forecast seems to go more westerly. Just a thought. I also realize that they said the GFS is an outlier! IM

the depression in the GOM is not expected move east but probably less that 100 miles or so, and never gets past 95w before it turns south to mexico.. can't see it having any effect and if it did would be minimal at best...

I agree my thought was hp moving east toward Florida might help kick the Irma east or help put pressure on the trough to nudge it a little east.
Last edited by invest man on Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

NFLnut
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:37 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7633 Postby NFLnut » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:09 pm

PandaCitrus wrote:There are many, many model tracks that would be bad for Florida and scare me. #1 Worst is the I-95 track.

The HWRF track straight up the spine of Florida might be the best of the worst options if hitting Florida is unavoidable. It would concentrate the maximum winds in the least populated areas (Everglades and agricultural counties) but would still be bad. Both Southwest and Southeast Florida would probably get Cat 2/3 winds and there would be major problems up in the Orlando area.



Yeah, no. I'm going to vote against the HWRF for exactly the last part of the last sentence of your post. I'm hoping the 18z GFS continues the trend.
0 likes   

caneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 am
Location: Clearwater Beach, Fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7634 Postby caneman » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:10 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
caneman wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
Like I said, different people have different methods of forecasting. Sometimes the “best” models don’t always do the best with certain setups. Knowing how to use the tools we have, and which ones to use for different synoptic setups, is an extremely important aspect of forecasting. Euro has been pretty inconsistent with which side of Florida to take Irma, I expect tonight it will trend east.


Read.the disco post at 11. Rockyman posted above. The NHC not putting much weight into GFS. Further, model verification actually shows Euro, NHC and UKMET being most accurate as of now. That too is posted above


I saw it. They’re waiting like usual for the 00z runs with the new data, that’s completely normal for the NHC. They never jump on a band wagon early and there’s no reason for a significant track adjustment until after they see the 00z suite.


The UKMET also trended west and on the east coast of Florida. We'll see.
Last edited by caneman on Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

NFLnut
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:37 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7635 Postby NFLnut » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:11 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:I saw it. They’re waiting like usual for the 00z runs with the new data, that’s completely normal for the NHC. They never jump on a band wagon early and there’s no reason for a significant track adjustment until after they see the 00z suite.



Especially when they still have the luxury of keeping those eastern swings out of their forecast because they're still in the 4-5 day cone. Sometime tomorrow, they will no longer have that luxury.
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7636 Postby Ken711 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:14 pm

caneman wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
caneman wrote:
Read.the disco post at 11. Rockyman posted above. The NHC not putting much weight into GFS. Further, model verification actually shows Euro, NHC and UKMET being most accurate as of now. That too is posted above


I saw it. They’re waiting like usual for the 00z runs with the new data, that’s completely normal for the NHC. They never jump on a band wagon early and there’s no reason for a significant track adjustment until after they see the 00z suite.


The UKMET also trended west and on the east coast of Florida. We'll see.


You mean the UKMET trended east?
1 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7637 Postby SFLcane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:17 pm

3 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7638 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:17 pm

I noticed the 18z GFS 6hr position is @60.2 and the 11pm position is 61.1, almost a full degree E...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7639 Postby Ken711 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:20 pm

Blown Away wrote:I noticed the 18z GFS 6hr position is @60.2 and the 11pm position is 61.1, almost a full degree E...


Slower moving west?
0 likes   

cdavis6287
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7640 Postby cdavis6287 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:23 pm

Here in Daytona the eastern shift is more than welcomed. I get multiple shifts are common this far out and big storms are hard to predict but why does it seem people seem upset the storm may recurve??? No power, destruction = not fun. I pray this thing recurves OTS. Either way Florida will get impacts from such a large storm. This thing could/ will be catostrophic wherever it comes close to.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests