08-31-2017 15:09

Moderator: S2k Moderators
ScottNAtlanta wrote:Kazmit wrote:Sciencerocks wrote:
Reminds me of Iris of 2001. It is just different compared to Andrew and charley which were also small cyclones but this when discussing the core is even smaller.
A few EWRCs will end up increasing the size by quite a bit. It's a classic occurrence with Cape Verde hurricanes.
I'm wondering if after one of those EWRC's if it will have one of those big annular looking eyes (Like Isabel)
SouthFLTropics wrote:ScottNAtlanta wrote:Kazmit wrote:
A few EWRCs will end up increasing the size by quite a bit. It's a classic occurrence with Cape Verde hurricanes.
I'm wondering if after one of those EWRC's if it will have one of those big annular looking eyes (Like Isabel)
I have a photo on my office wall of Isabel's eye when it had all of the other vortices rotating around in it and looked like a pentagram.
GCANE wrote:The ULL to the NW is forecast to move west in tandem with Irma and have minimal effect.
storm_in_a_teacup wrote:chaser1 wrote:'Ol Irma seems quite content just riding along that 28C Isotherm. I'd guess the young Gal will likely maintain present level of intensity until crossing between 45W-50W. Here's where the octane looks to increase a tad and i'd guess when we see her reach Cat. 4. That cut off low to its northwest looks to be filling and just getting squeezed out of the way. I dont think it'll continue to drop south ahead of Irma but likely soon make a small cyclonic loop and be forced back north and into the Westerlies. Beyond that feature, I'm just not seeing much/anything to inhibit further strengthening (other than land itself) for at least several days. Hmmmm, I'm beginning to question if my low pressure guess (919mb I think?) might not have been quite low enough?! Oh well, I'll just sit pat with my guess, and if I don't win the million dollars??? Hey, the tax implications would've just been a nightmare to deal with anyhow LOL. Feels really odd to watch such a strong system so far east, but one that has the potential to impact so many.
Is it just me, or do people on this site call hurricanes with female names "girl" or "gal" a lot more than they call hurricanes with male names "boy" or "guy"? Not saying you have to stop doing so...as long as you don't start saying "Irma engulfed miles of coastline in her moist mouth..." like they said about Carla
Miami Storm Tracker wrote:Looking at the latest IR sat lop=op, Irma is obvisouly a well organized system. But I thought based on how it looked when she was an invest, that she would be a looking much larger Geographitcal speaking than she is at this time.
Imran_doomhaMwx wrote:Day/Night DNB Imagery VIIRS
08-31-2017 15:09
Miami Storm Tracker wrote:This question is open to everyone, but really to my local S.FLA friends on here. you all know who your are, Boca, JFL South fla storm and so on.
Based on the latest model runs, meaning a blend of them all not just the GFS or the EURO, what is your thinking as to where Irma will end up.
Miami Storm Tracker wrote:This question is open to everyone, but really to my local S.FLA friends on here. you all know who your are, Boca, JFL South fla storm and so on.
Based on the latest model runs, meaning a blend of them all not just the GFS or the EURO, what is your thinking as to where Irma will end up.
Miami Storm Tracker wrote:This question is open to everyone, but really to my local S.FLA friends on here. you all know who your are, Boca, JFL South fla storm and so on.
Based on the latest model runs, meaning a blend of them all not just the GFS or the EURO, what is your thinking as to where Irma will end up.
Evenstar wrote:storm_in_a_teacup wrote:chaser1 wrote:'Ol Irma seems quite content just riding along that 28C Isotherm. I'd guess the young Gal will likely maintain present level of intensity until crossing between 45W-50W. Here's where the octane looks to increase a tad and i'd guess when we see her reach Cat. 4. That cut off low to its northwest looks to be filling and just getting squeezed out of the way. I dont think it'll continue to drop south ahead of Irma but likely soon make a small cyclonic loop and be forced back north and into the Westerlies. Beyond that feature, I'm just not seeing much/anything to inhibit further strengthening (other than land itself) for at least several days. Hmmmm, I'm beginning to question if my low pressure guess (919mb I think?) might not have been quite low enough?! Oh well, I'll just sit pat with my guess, and if I don't win the million dollars??? Hey, the tax implications would've just been a nightmare to deal with anyhow LOL. Feels really odd to watch such a strong system so far east, but one that has the potential to impact so many.
Is it just me, or do people on this site call hurricanes with female names "girl" or "gal" a lot more than they call hurricanes with male names "boy" or "guy"? Not saying you have to stop doing so...as long as you don't start saying "Irma engulfed miles of coastline in her moist mouth..." like they said about Carla
I think of hurricanes in much the same way I think of ships (on the sea, in the air and in space), in female pronouns. It doesn't feel natural to me to refer to them as male unless they are specifically given male names. I've always been of the opinion that when men use female pronouns for inanimate objects they are using them almost as terms of endearment.
Anyway, sorry, off topic. I just wanted to put the fellas at ease so they don't feel like they have to assiduously watch what they say. We're all grown ups here (theoretically).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests