ATL: Ex INVEST 96L - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
Massive outflow boundary shooting north out of the western side a good sign this is losing convergence and organization.
2 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
What we have is an elongated trough with a mid-level circulation. Nothing is consolidating anytime soon...
5 likes
- CyclonicFury
- Category 5
- Posts: 2019
- Age: 26
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:32 pm
- Location: NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
96L is an elongated mess. I doubt it ever consolidates into anything much.
2 likes
NCSU B.S. in Meteorology Class of 2021. Tropical weather blogger at http://www.cyclonicfury.com. My forecasts and thoughts are NOT official, for official forecasts please consult the National Hurricane Center.
- USVIKimmie
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 10:12 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
Been watching like a hawk, also learning new stuff, but the NHC 2pm... and this is the 3rd time I've seen two forecasters sign their reports. Ideas about that?
ZCZC MIATWOAT ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
Tropical Weather Outlook
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
200 PM EDT Sat Aug 3 2019
For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:
1. A large area of showers and thunderstorms located several hundred
miles east of the Lesser Antilles is associated with a tropical
wave. Some slow development of this system is possible over the next
day or two as the disturbance moves west-northwestward toward the
northern Lesser Antilles. Upper-level winds are then expected to
become unfavorable for further development early next week.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...20 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...20 percent.
Forecaster Latto/Zelinsky
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
USVIKimmie wrote:Been watching like a hawk, also learning new stuff, but the NHC 2pm... and this is the 3rd time I've seen two forecasters sign their reports. Ideas about that?ZCZC MIATWOAT ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
Tropical Weather Outlook
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
200 PM EDT Sat Aug 3 2019
For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:
1. A large area of showers and thunderstorms located several hundred
miles east of the Lesser Antilles is associated with a tropical
wave. Some slow development of this system is possible over the next
day or two as the disturbance moves west-northwestward toward the
northern Lesser Antilles. Upper-level winds are then expected to
become unfavorable for further development early next week.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...20 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...20 percent.
Forecaster Latto/Zelinsky
I was thinking training or apprenticeship possibly, taking the opportunity since it's pretty quiet otherwise.
2 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
You can start to see some low level circulation this afternoon so I'm glad the forecast future wind pattern will be hostile. Could reach depression status if there is a low level circulation.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:31 pm
- Location: Jerusalem, Israel
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
GCANE wrote:Latest multi-sat analysis.
I hear the duck quaking.
Need a good SCAT and it'll be our next TD.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/285/9ih0zv.gif
Those multi-sat wind analyses have a bias of making developing tropical waves/weak TCs too symmetrical - be wary of using them.
4 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
the NHC percentages tell you all you need to know.... RIP! On to the next.......
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:11 am
- Location: Central Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
ConvergenceZone wrote:the NHC percentages tell you all you need to know.... RIP! On to the next.......
Yup time for bones
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
I'm seeing a far more distinct COC with some deep convection starting to pop just NW of center. Probably not fully to the surface yet but it's present location situates itself fairly well for short term upper level divergent outflow.
Given my observations of the parameters which NHC appears to be using this year for T.D. & T.S. classifications and upgrades (rather then a more historical and conservative assessment of benchmark characteristics that more
consistantly were used to define an actual T.D. or T.S. in the past), then I'd be surprised if NHC did not issue a Special Tropical Disturbance statement later this afternoon that a T.D. may be forming. Following that, any half decent Ascat and/or couple buoy or ship reports and I'd fully expect NHC to tag this a T.D or even a min. T.S. The fact that it may well be short lived & fairly transient due to dry air and an increase in upper level shear within 24-36 hours does not seem as relevant as it used to. Quick!! Get a plane out there while it's still turning. That or someone patch a call through to the Redneck Navy - now! I'm sure someone's got an old barometer and a hand-held anemometer capable of measuring a 5 knot west wind?!
Given my observations of the parameters which NHC appears to be using this year for T.D. & T.S. classifications and upgrades (rather then a more historical and conservative assessment of benchmark characteristics that more
consistantly were used to define an actual T.D. or T.S. in the past), then I'd be surprised if NHC did not issue a Special Tropical Disturbance statement later this afternoon that a T.D. may be forming. Following that, any half decent Ascat and/or couple buoy or ship reports and I'd fully expect NHC to tag this a T.D or even a min. T.S. The fact that it may well be short lived & fairly transient due to dry air and an increase in upper level shear within 24-36 hours does not seem as relevant as it used to. Quick!! Get a plane out there while it's still turning. That or someone patch a call through to the Redneck Navy - now! I'm sure someone's got an old barometer and a hand-held anemometer capable of measuring a 5 knot west wind?!

3 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
Cumulus showing some very tight spin just north of 12.5N 52W
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
Hmm, gravity waves ontop of the cumulus.
Keeping a real close eye on this.
Keeping a real close eye on this.
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
North side curvature is becoming less defined. Favoring the central area under that very distinct low to mid level circ. If convection fired with that it could quickly consolidate at the surface.
2 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
That is a very vigorous low level circ. It has a central calm area you can track on IR. Some convection is all it will take.
2 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22951
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
Heading into very strong wind shear. Development chances somewhere between slim and none.
3 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
I see a COC in the ballpark of 13.0N & 52.5. That's pretty much in-line with Best Track from earlier in the day. That would seem like an over-all recent term motion of about 270/275. I think it was in the models thread where I noticed a couple of you guys discussing some subtle distinctions between how the EURO and the GFS were each depicting the 500mb ridging a bit differently; One suggesting a more cellular ridging flow that suggested a turn more to the WNW or NW, while the other model suggesting a more elongated and perhaps westward building mid-level ridge. The latter suggesting the possibility of a more westward push well into the E. Caribbean.
Well, pick your poison but the appearance of a more westward track might have been a solution that could lead to nearer term development before upper level shear undresses her in roughly 72 hours. Whereas a near-term NW'ward motion would seem to imply a much quicker dose of tropical SALmanilla followed by a quick decapitation by KingTUTT. Ironically it's that second more dramatic short-term demise that I would have thought more likely. Then perhaps a few days later following a several mb surface pressure drop, the lagging surface reflection (a feable looking stretched out mess) just east of the Bahamas reamerges as another Gale Center which I'd have bet my underwear that NHC would surely tag it with a name for 12 hours or so.
Maybe west is better. Call me old-fashioned but I like my tropical cyclones to include spiral rain bands and lasting at least a couple days. Hopefully, any development that might occur.... will not bring anything more then T.S. force winds to the Antilles.
Well, pick your poison but the appearance of a more westward track might have been a solution that could lead to nearer term development before upper level shear undresses her in roughly 72 hours. Whereas a near-term NW'ward motion would seem to imply a much quicker dose of tropical SALmanilla followed by a quick decapitation by KingTUTT. Ironically it's that second more dramatic short-term demise that I would have thought more likely. Then perhaps a few days later following a several mb surface pressure drop, the lagging surface reflection (a feable looking stretched out mess) just east of the Bahamas reamerges as another Gale Center which I'd have bet my underwear that NHC would surely tag it with a name for 12 hours or so.
Maybe west is better. Call me old-fashioned but I like my tropical cyclones to include spiral rain bands and lasting at least a couple days. Hopefully, any development that might occur.... will not bring anything more then T.S. force winds to the Antilles.
3 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3755
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
- Location: miami fl
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:I see a COC in the ballpark of 13.0N & 52.5. That's pretty much in-line with Best Track from earlier in the day. That would seem like an over-all recent term motion of about 270/275. I think it was in the models thread where I noticed a couple of you guys discussing some subtle distinctions between how the EURO and the GFS were each depicting the 500mb ridging a bit differently; One suggesting a more cellular ridging flow that suggested a turn more to the WNW or NW, while the other model suggesting a more elongated and perhaps westward building mid-level ridge. The latter suggesting the possibility of a more westward push well into the E. Caribbean.
Well, pick your poison but the appearance of a more westward track might have been a solution that could lead to nearer term development before upper level shear undresses her in roughly 72 hours. Whereas a near-term NW'ward motion would seem to imply a much quicker dose of tropical SALmanilla followed by a quick decapitation by KingTUTT. Ironically it's that second more dramatic short-term demise that I would have thought more likely. Then perhaps a few days later following a several mb surface pressure drop, the lagging surface reflection (a feable looking stretched out mess) just east of the Bahamas reamerges as another Gale Center which I'd have bet my underwear that NHC would surely tag it with a name for 12 hours or so.
Maybe west is better. Call me old-fashioned but I like my tropical cyclones to include spiral rain bands and lasting at least a couple days. Hopefully, any development that might occur.... will not bring anything more then T.S. force winds to the Antilles.
i think 96l done been trying but shear want it dead and SAL now we see when we have 97l i think be few week when SAL dead down and tull move alway and shear
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
wxman57 wrote:Heading into very strong wind shear. Development chances somewhere between slim and none.
No doubt, there's shear to the north of her.... shear to the south of her.... "here I am, stuck in the middle with you" (isn't that a Beatles song?? Anyway, I digress...

So, your not thinking the present COC might narrowly be under any east/west upper COL extending eastward from the Caribbean? Based on today's earlier shear analysis it looked to me like it might just thread that needle. Then again, perhaps I was overestimating the relative area of lighter UL winds?
2 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3755
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
- Location: miami fl
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Heading into very strong wind shear. Development chances somewhere between slim and none.
No doubt, there's shear to the north of her.... shear to the south of her.... "here I am, stuck in the middle with you" (isn't that a Beatles song?? Anyway, I digress...)
So, your not thinking the present COC might narrowly be under any east/west upper COL extending eastward from the Caribbean? Based on today's earlier shear analysis it looked to me like it might just thread that needle. Then again, perhaps I was overestimating the relative area of lighter UL winds?
at 8pm i see % drop too 10 and 5% next five days 96l done
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion
floridasun78 wrote:chaser1 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Heading into very strong wind shear. Development chances somewhere between slim and none.
No doubt, there's shear to the north of her.... shear to the south of her.... "here I am, stuck in the middle with you" (isn't that a Beatles song?? Anyway, I digress...)
So, your not thinking the present COC might narrowly be under any east/west upper COL extending eastward from the Caribbean? Based on today's earlier shear analysis it looked to me like it might just thread that needle. Then again, perhaps I was overestimating the relative area of lighter UL winds?
at 8pm i see % drop too 10 and 5% next five days 96l done
You may well be right


1 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests