AutoPenalti wrote:I’m still on the no development train.
No development as in... further development ? It’s already a TS
Moderator: S2k Moderators
AutoPenalti wrote:I’m still on the no development train.
Stormi wrote:So basically it's harder for models to get a better grasp on smaller storms not simply due to their size, but because of possible fluctuations of intensity that can occur much faster than with larger storms? That would make sense along with less shear needed to RIP up a smaller storm vs a larger one. This is why I ask
eastcoastFL wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:I’m still on the no development train.
No development as in... further development ? It’s already a TS
abajan wrote:I don't know if it's just an illusion, but latest satellite imagery seems to indicate it's already made the predicted WNW turn.
abajan wrote:I don't know if it's just an illusion, but latest satellite imagery seems to indicate it's already made the predicted WNW turn.
tolakram wrote:I believe it was Derek Ort's thesis that discussed how dry air is mainly an issue when shear is present. Shear is the main issue at the moment, if and when it lets up we'll see what happens.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests