Ken711 wrote:Ryan Maue
@RyanMaue
Note, this pretty much verified.
HWRF did remarkable for short term rapid intensification.
NHC 950 mb at 00Z.
Such a doom run 2 days ago and it nailed it!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ken711 wrote:Ryan Maue
@RyanMaue
Note, this pretty much verified.
HWRF did remarkable for short term rapid intensification.
NHC 950 mb at 00Z.
drewschmaltz wrote:Blinhart wrote:MacTavish wrote:
Its deepening rapidly but please control the sensationalism
I'm not sensationalizing this at all, I was asking a question that I know many people were thinking.
I'm going to go ahead and cast my vote for sensationalism. Everyone waits around for the new updates wondering "how strong did he get" and almost immediately we get "is this going to be the strongest Ever". That's almost the definition of sensationalism. It's like watching your favorite team make a basket and then immediately thinking "what if they never miss another shot". It's just too much too soon. It's sensational.
HarryPotter wrote:Waiting to see what this next sonde brings... NE eyewall. Wonder if it hits Cat 4 if they will issue a separate update or wait for 2300 regular one?
norva13x wrote:brock berlin wrote:Well we can all feel a little less guilty marveling over this intensifying storm now that a US landfall looks unlikely. However, the Bahamas are still UTG so don't completely forget about them.
You really need to stop this, sounding the all clear and saying a US threat is unlikely is way off from one set of model runs when many of those runs/ensembles still show it over FL.
supercane4867 wrote:HWRF has Dorian going through another two ERCs before landfall. The first one could begin tonight
1900hurricane wrote:Whenever a system like this becomes intense like this with recon coverage, I always play the mental game of
At 00Z, DT is 6.0 for a WMG eye in LG and surrounded by B, which about matches what recon has found *so far*. That should be the basis for the FT. It's close to constraints coming into play considering an FT increase of 0.5 in 6 hr, 1.0 in 12 hr, and 1.5 in 24 hr, but that should still fall under the rapid development curve of a 1.5 T increase per day. Additionally, SATCON has spiked up recently. Microwave estimates haven't been available for a few hours, but they did match well with the 18Z intensity of 100 kt. ADT is at about 110 kt right now, although hamstrung by its own constrains some. Using this data, I'd probably go 115 kt, although a more conservative forecaster might use 110 kt.
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/products/tc_realtime/products/storms/2019AL05/4KMSRBDC/2019AL05_4KMSRBDC_201908302330.jpg
Yellow Evan wrote:supercane4867 wrote:HWRF has Dorian going through another two ERCs before landfall. The first one could begin tonight
HWRF has the ability to predict ERC's now?
Yellow Evan wrote:1900hurricane wrote:Whenever a system like this becomes intense like this with recon coverage, I always play the mental game of
At 00Z, DT is 6.0 for a WMG eye in LG and surrounded by B, which about matches what recon has found *so far*. That should be the basis for the FT. It's close to constraints coming into play considering an FT increase of 0.5 in 6 hr, 1.0 in 12 hr, and 1.5 in 24 hr, but that should still fall under the rapid development curve of a 1.5 T increase per day. Additionally, SATCON has spiked up recently. Microwave estimates haven't been available for a few hours, but they did match well with the 18Z intensity of 100 kt. ADT is at about 110 kt right now, although hamstrung by its own constrains some. Using this data, I'd probably go 115 kt, although a more conservative forecaster might use 110 kt.
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/products/tc_realtime/products/storms/2019AL05/4KMSRBDC/2019AL05_4KMSRBDC_201908302330.jpg
This was T5.5 six hours ago, T5.0 12 hours ago IIRC, so not sure how constraints are a problem in this case.
MacTavish wrote:johngaltfla wrote:
Current, not future. The steering currents will have to be substantially stronger than currently indicated, in my opinion, to divert or steer a major hurricane like this once it becomes a strong Cat 4 or stronger.
Thats not how steering currents work, but sure thats your opinion.
Large TC s have strong winds out to 5-7 miles radially that could affect steering flow computations. Super Typhoon Abby (1983) was large enough (a 30 knot wind radius of over 350 nm or 650 km) that TC winds were included in steering flow computations (Chan, 1986). There is evidence that the steering flow concept may not be as applicable in large size TCs as it is for small size TCs.
MetroMike wrote:Nice 96 frame with Fl and Dorian showing general w/nw motion near the end?
https://weather.cod.edu/satrad/?parms=s ... orbar=data
drezee wrote:114kts unflagged
9583 +164 +155 132091 111 114 017 00
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests