NDG wrote:senorpepr wrote:Good news from the recon front... Gonzo (G-IV) is taxiing for take off!!
Yes!!! Great news!
Hopefully they reinforced the windshield since this storm is evidently the bane of airplane windshields.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
NDG wrote:senorpepr wrote:Good news from the recon front... Gonzo (G-IV) is taxiing for take off!!
Yes!!! Great news!
BrandonJay21 wrote:senorpepr wrote:Good news from the recon front... Gonzo (G-IV) is taxiing for take off!!
Probably dumb question... is Gonzo the plane that will take readings of the the ridge strength?
BrandonJay21 wrote:senorpepr wrote:Good news from the recon front... Gonzo (G-IV) is taxiing for take off!!
Probably dumb question... is Gonzo the plane that will take readings of the the ridge strength?
sponger wrote:BrandonJay21 wrote:senorpepr wrote:Good news from the recon front... Gonzo (G-IV) is taxiing for take off!!
Probably dumb question... is Gonzo the plane that will take readings of the the ridge strength?
Correct and its orientation.
senorpepr wrote:Good news from the recon front... Gonzo (G-IV) is taxiing for take off!!
Kat5 wrote:Looking at the WV loop, looks as if the shortwave trough might be coming in a little more sooner than predicted. IMO
CrazyC83 wrote:I know the SFMR needs research to see how it responds in category 4 and 5 storms. For that reason, I'd probably keep it at 130 kt for now. I'd want to see flight-level winds in the 145-150 range to have more confidence.
NDG wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:I know the SFMR needs research to see how it responds in category 4 and 5 storms. For that reason, I'd probably keep it at 130 kt for now. I'd want to see flight-level winds in the 145-150 range to have more confidence.
Don't forget that they dismissed a lot of those SFMR readings with Michael that called for a Cat 5 just before landfall to later upgrade it to a Cat 5
Ian2401 wrote:Kat5 wrote:Looking at the WV loop, looks as if the shortwave trough might be coming in a little more sooner than predicted. IMO
how does that affect track?
CrazyC83 wrote:I know the SFMR needs research to see how it responds in category 4 and 5 storms. For that reason, I'd probably keep it at 130 kt for now. I'd want to see flight-level winds in the 145-150 range to have more confidence.
BYG Jacob wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:I know the SFMR needs research to see how it responds in category 4 and 5 storms. For that reason, I'd probably keep it at 130 kt for now. I'd want to see flight-level winds in the 145-150 range to have more confidence.
My question is, if you don’t trust something why use it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests