USTropics wrote:jlauderdal wrote:really need to understand why the gfs and euro struggled with this one and i don't believe it was lack of planes and crusie ships, there are enough planes flying for data, you don't need data every 20 mins..the atmospheric setup was always there and sst's certainly were never an issue...the track was decent but the intensity was awful...i expect the track the shift south, if I'm in key west I am buying fuel today for the gennyBlown Away wrote:06z GFS... Cat 1/2 into SFL/Key Largo... Wow this will get the board jumping more than coffee this morning...
It seems this season there needs to be an established LLC for the operational GFS/ECMWF to finally give us realistic solutions. In my personal opinion it has some connection with how these models use convective parameterization. This was the 00z ECMWF run from the 19th for now (so the run just from 24 hours ago). Completely missed the convective burst that occurred last night over the circulation:
https://i.imgur.com/JZ67BaH.png
https://i.imgur.com/Vj5rI9R.png
excellent point on the convective burst...if it misses that it really doesn't stand a chance of a realistic solution downstream...I'm starting to think these models are getting to complex for their own good, too much data and "overthinking it"...this banter the last few days about lack of ships and planes causing the issue while plausible, if the model fails because its not getting data every few minutes then we have problem..its not like their are no planes flying and trans Atlantic shipping is alive and well