Hayabusa wrote:Hmm01B AMPHAN 200517 1800 12.6N 86.6E IO 110 942
Not bad. I wouldn’t say Amphan is quite worthy of 120-130 kt yet, so 110 kt is pretty reasonable. Once that eye clears up, then it’s an easy T#6.5-7.0
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Hayabusa wrote:Hmm01B AMPHAN 200517 1800 12.6N 86.6E IO 110 942
Yellow Evan wrote:The eye isn't warming as fast as I would like (ADT suggests it's steady) but it does appear to be becoming more circular. Once the eye warms to around -20C or higher, this will likely justify a Category 5 intensity.
Highteeld wrote:MPI well under 900 mb for most of the track into the coast.
https://i.imgur.com/tIuV8ie.png
Hayabusa wrote:Just imagine the raws if the eye is in the + instead while having that very CDG
2020MAY17 201500 4.7 966.7 82.2 4.7 5.4 6.7 1.7T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF -59.40 -86.67 EYE -99 IR -15.5 12.80 -86.60 ARCHER MSG1 53.4
Kingarabian wrote:Hayabusa wrote:Just imagine the raws if the eye is in the + instead while having that very CDG
2020MAY17 201500 4.7 966.7 82.2 4.7 5.4 6.7 1.7T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF -59.40 -86.67 EYE -99 IR -15.5 12.80 -86.60 ARCHER MSG1 53.4
If the eye becomes positive then what analogs are there? Haiyan or Patricia?
aspen wrote:Highteeld wrote:MPI well under 900 mb for most of the track into the coast.
https://i.imgur.com/tIuV8ie.png
Are those regions of <875 mbar MPIs?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests