aspen wrote:Does anyone have a link to Douglas’ ADT page?
https://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/2 ... E-list.txt
Moderator: S2k Moderators
aspen wrote:Does anyone have a link to Douglas’ ADT page?
Extratropical94 wrote:aspen wrote:Does anyone have a link to Douglas’ ADT page?
https://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/2 ... E-list.txt
aspen wrote:Extratropical94 wrote:aspen wrote:Does anyone have a link to Douglas’ ADT page?
https://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/2 ... E-list.txt
I should’ve reworded that better. I’m looking for that live ADT page CIMSS has. I didn’t know NOAA had one.
Also, seriously? 105 kt for 12z?
Highteeld wrote:Would probably guess around 115 kt/948 mb at this point. Eye is very well defined right now; cloud tops are the main limiting factor
Kingarabian wrote:Still a bit dry around the eyewall but regardless, this is a solid eyewall.
https://i.imgur.com/23MW5ms.png
aspen wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Still a bit dry around the eyewall but regardless, this is a solid eyewall.
https://i.imgur.com/23MW5ms.png
Almost looks like there was a second eyewall trying to form, but has been weakened by dry air and is being absorbed back into the main one. Maybe dry air could halt an EWRC like what possibly happened with Dorian, and Douglas can at least maintain its intensity before moving over 26 C and colder waters.
HurricaneEnzo wrote:Douglas keeps looking better and better. Using the good ole 'eye test' again I would imagine this is no less than a mid to upper level Cat 4 currently. Of course that is far from officialI know the word 'annular' is a buzzword that is thrown around a lot but almost looks like it is starting to go annular looking at the western half of the storm.
SconnieCane wrote:HurricaneEnzo wrote:Douglas keeps looking better and better. Using the good ole 'eye test' again I would imagine this is no less than a mid to upper level Cat 4 currently. Of course that is far from officialI know the word 'annular' is a buzzword that is thrown around a lot but almost looks like it is starting to go annular looking at the western half of the storm.
Yup. Nice symmetrical "doughnut" CDO and modest banding. For it to be truly annualar, though; I think the eye needs to be bigger (the "doughnut hole") and even less banding.
Yellow Evan wrote:TXPZ25 KNES 231227
TCSENP
A. 08E (DOUGLAS)
B. 23/1130Z
C. 13.3N
D. 135.0W
E. ONE/GOES-W
F. T5.0/5.5
G. IR/EIR
H. REMARKS...PEAK INTENSITY MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT 0530Z WHEN THE DT WAS
A 6.0. A WMG EYE WAS MEASURED, EMBEDDED IN MG WITH A RING TEMP OF LG,
CREATING AN EYE ADJ OF +0.5, RESULTING IN A DT OF 5.0. THE MET AND PT
AGREE AND THE FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...MLEVINE
Are we looking at the same storm?
aspen wrote:The Cat 3/4 EPac beauty we’ve all been waiting for.
https://rammb-data.cira.colostate.edu/tc_realtime/products/storms/2020ep08/1kmsrvis/2020ep08_1kmsrvis_202007231610.gif
Shell Mound wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:TXPZ25 KNES 231227
TCSENP
A. 08E (DOUGLAS)
B. 23/1130Z
C. 13.3N
D. 135.0W
E. ONE/GOES-W
F. T5.0/5.5
G. IR/EIR
H. REMARKS...PEAK INTENSITY MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT 0530Z WHEN THE DT WAS
A 6.0. A WMG EYE WAS MEASURED, EMBEDDED IN MG WITH A RING TEMP OF LG,
CREATING AN EYE ADJ OF +0.5, RESULTING IN A DT OF 5.0. THE MET AND PT
AGREE AND THE FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...MLEVINE
Are we looking at the same storm?
Does anyone know why some of these Dvorak estimates have become more conservative this year?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests