ATL: LAURA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#421 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:55 am

This thing needs to start gaining latitude or else chances of it running over the Greater Antilles is becoming increasingly likely.
2 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#422 Postby abajan » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:04 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:It wouldn't be 2020 without our best models showing no development as observations show an organizing disturbance. Probably not too far off from a TC right now. Aric is correct that the eastern side has gotten better organized, shedding the convergent boundary associated with the monsoon trough. I think this should allow convection to persist in the western vort max we have been tracking.

I don't want to speculate on the forecast track too much until we definitively see where and when a TC forms, but if I lived in the northern Antilles, I would definitely prepare for the potential of TC impacts over the next 3–5 days.

Something to note: as of now, we should have a NOAA P3 flight into 98L sometime tomorrow. Hopefully observations from the plane, including the onboard radar observations, will allow the models to more properly resolve the structure of the disturbance.

Pardon me for asking you to prematurely speculate, but (in your professional opinion) is Barbados in any danger of being hit directly by this?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#423 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:10 am

toad strangler wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Not quite a TC yet. Surface circulation is still too broad and elongated:

https://i.imgur.com/WdmOk3p.jpg


oh man that thing is loaded with ambiguities in the west and SW quad. we just saw this with ASCAT and Josephine where the NHC upgraded despite the SCAT not showing a well defiend circ do to those ambiguities.

that entire west and SW is obviously not correct lol that is the best looking low level structure on satellite. lol


You just totally confused me here.


Lets just say ASCAT is very confused with the West and SW quads. happened with couple systems this year. that were well established.

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#424 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:12 am

gatorcane wrote:Ok I will concede some on the shear but the dry air is very much a problem. You can see it in the visible shot:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


There really isn't much dry air in the vicinity of 98L. SAL is mostly to the N

https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... e_Water-WX
https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... an_Dust-WX
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#425 Postby chaser1 » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:15 am

abajan wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:It wouldn't be 2020 without our best models showing no development as observations show an organizing disturbance. Probably not too far off from a TC right now. Aric is correct that the eastern side has gotten better organized, shedding the convergent boundary associated with the monsoon trough. I think this should allow convection to persist in the western vort max we have been tracking.

I don't want to speculate on the forecast track too much until we definitively see where and when a TC forms, but if I lived in the northern Antilles, I would definitely prepare for the potential of TC impacts over the next 3–5 days.

Something to note: as of now, we should have a NOAA P3 flight into 98L sometime tomorrow. Hopefully observations from the plane, including the onboard radar observations, will allow the models to more properly resolve the structure of the disturbance.

Pardon me for asking you to prematurely speculate, but (in your professional opinion) is Barbados in any danger of being hit directly by this?


Abajan, purely my own opinion here however I don't see 98L having a serious impact to Barbados. Assuming greater structural development of a mean COC, this should increase the likelihood of a gain of latitude during the next 36 hours. SST's markedly increase with longitude gained and it would be hard to imagine this system defying NHC forecast for development within the short term period of time. Seems to me that Guadeloupe to Barbuda might have the greatest risk of direct impact at this time.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#426 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:16 am

The main inhibiting factor here will be the real possibility of taking the GA's on head first and E to W. :blowup:
2 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#427 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:21 am

1 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#428 Postby chaser1 » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:25 am

toad strangler wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Ok I will concede some on the shear but the dry air is very much a problem. You can see it in the visible shot:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


There really isn't much dry air in the vicinity of 98L. SAL is mostly to the N

https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... e_Water-WX
https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... an_Dust-WX


I tend to agree with Gatorcane in that there still might be some mid level humidity issues still going on. Water Vapor sat does generally suggest that the really salty stuff does remain primarily to it's north but I think that the MDR is still generally working out some SAL within some levels. I think a bit of added SST juice might aid to further increase 98's convective bursting by this time tomm. My guess is tomm will be an interesting day developmental wise, with a better indication if/when such organization will result in a greater gain in latitude.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#429 Postby toad strangler » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:31 am

chaser1 wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Ok I will concede some on the shear but the dry air is very much a problem. You can see it in the visible shot:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24


There really isn't much dry air in the vicinity of 98L. SAL is mostly to the N

https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... e_Water-WX
https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... an_Dust-WX


I tend to agree with Gatorcane in that there still might be some mid level humidity issues still going on. Water Vapor sat does generally suggest that the really salty stuff does remain primarily to it's north but I think that the MDR is still generally working out some SAL within some levels. I think a bit of added SST juice might aid to further increase 98's convective bursting by this time tomm. My guess is tomm will be an interesting day developmental wise, with a better indication if/when such organization will result in a greater gain in latitude.


Well I guess we just have to disagree. I don't think dry air as anything to do with the wave not organizing. Other factors. Levi just tweeted a big one.
0 likes   

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#430 Postby DestinHurricane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:33 am

I wounder if the NHC will start to lower those development chances with the reliable models being in a good consensus that nothing will come out of this.
2 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#431 Postby Weatherboy1 » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:34 am

I definitely get a “Georges in 1998” vibe with this one. Anything can happen of course. But setup/forecast track looks pretty similar as of now
0 likes   

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#432 Postby DestinHurricane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:36 am

Weatherboy1 wrote:I definitely get a “Georges in 1998” vibe with this one. Anything can happen of course. But setup/forecast track looks pretty similar as of now


Georges? No way this gets that far west. At this point a recuve is more likely than MS/AL/Western Panhandle.
0 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#433 Postby aspen » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:36 am

DestinHurricane wrote:I wounder if the NHC will start to lower those development chances with the reliable models being in a good consensus that nothing will come out of this.

Reliable models also had a good consensus that nothing much would come out of Hanna. Then it became an 80 kt hurricane.

Point is, the models have been less than reliable this year, and things in the Atlantic love to develop without much support. I wouldn’t write this one off just yet.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#434 Postby eastcoastFL » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:40 am

DestinHurricane wrote:I wounder if the NHC will start to lower those development chances with the reliable models being in a good consensus that nothing will come out of this.


“Reliable models”... I don’t know if that’s a thing right now.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#435 Postby DestinHurricane » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:42 am

I don't think i've ever in my life seen the GFS/Euro show nothing while the NHC says 90/90.
6 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#436 Postby eastcoastFL » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:50 am

IR doesn’t look great but on visible it really looks like it’s getting together
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#437 Postby eastcoastFL » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:52 am

DestinHurricane wrote:I don't think i've ever in my life seen the GFS/Euro show nothing while the NHC says 90/90.


I’ve never seen it. I’ll lean towards the NHC Over any models though. That’s for sure.
4 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#438 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:52 am

Image
Convection building over circulation center @12.8N/45W... Let's see if it persists...
3 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#439 Postby SouthDadeFish » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:54 am

abajan wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:It wouldn't be 2020 without our best models showing no development as observations show an organizing disturbance. Probably not too far off from a TC right now. Aric is correct that the eastern side has gotten better organized, shedding the convergent boundary associated with the monsoon trough. I think this should allow convection to persist in the western vort max we have been tracking.

I don't want to speculate on the forecast track too much until we definitively see where and when a TC forms, but if I lived in the northern Antilles, I would definitely prepare for the potential of TC impacts over the next 3–5 days.

Something to note: as of now, we should have a NOAA P3 flight into 98L sometime tomorrow. Hopefully observations from the plane, including the onboard radar observations, will allow the models to more properly resolve the structure of the disturbance.

Pardon me for asking you to prematurely speculate, but (in your professional opinion) is Barbados in any danger of being hit directly by this?


Of course you should first listen to NHC/your local officials, but in my opinion, that looks quite unlikely at this time. The island could get some squally weather from some outer bands of the disturbance.
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#440 Postby chaser1 » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:54 am

toad strangler wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
There really isn't much dry air in the vicinity of 98L. SAL is mostly to the N

https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... e_Water-WX
https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/weath ... an_Dust-WX


I tend to agree with Gatorcane in that there still might be some mid level humidity issues still going on. Water Vapor sat does generally suggest that the really salty stuff does remain primarily to it's north but I think that the MDR is still generally working out some SAL within some levels. I think a bit of added SST juice might aid to further increase 98's convective bursting by this time tomm. My guess is tomm will be an interesting day developmental wise, with a better indication if/when such organization will result in a greater gain in latitude.


Well I guess we just have to disagree. I don't think dry air as anything to do with the wave not organizing. Other factors. Levi just tweeted a big one.


Point taken. The easterly surge resulting in any LLC to lag behind certainly isn't helping it's short term development process. Satellite presentation does to at least suggest a more consolidated envelope but I'd be surprised to see this reflect in that much improvement of it's lower level convergence today. Either way, perhaps the models are "out-guessing" NHC by retarding development or at least delaying it. This makes sense when we see models with a bit more south track solution through the big islands rather then to the north of them.
1 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests