MetroMike wrote:In the latest radar loop appears the center has been trending more NNE as opposed to earlier easterly motion.
Yes looks that way to me too....
Moderator: S2k Moderators
MetroMike wrote:In the latest radar loop appears the center has been trending more NNE as opposed to earlier easterly motion.
Laser30033003 wrote:MetroMike wrote:In the latest radar loop appears the center has been trending more NNE as opposed to earlier easterly motion.
Yes looks that way to me too....
Aric Dunn wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
I see so doppler on board they use but not ground based during landfall. and nothing will beat direct measurements. radar estimate afterall.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. I've seen many references to 88D ground radar velocities in forecast discussions.
not going to get into it..
but maybe a dumb question.. if onboard radar was accurate enough why continously do passes through obviously decaying llc and not once go through the more important looking developing llc.
why do a pass at all... just fly in circles on the outer edge and use radar..
SouthDadeFish wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this. I've seen many references to 88D ground radar velocities in forecast discussions.
not going to get into it..
but maybe a dumb question.. if onboard radar was accurate enough why continously do passes through obviously decaying llc and not once go through the more important looking developing llc.
why do a pass at all... just fly in circles on the outer edge and use radar..
This is a very fair question. A few comments:
1) The tail Doppler radar (TDR) is an X-band radar which suffers from some attenuation issues. Can really only get reliable data out to ~50 km away from the aircraft.
2) In-situ data is still very valuable. There is some base level of uncertainty with the radar obs.
3) At the time they flew, the decaying LLC was still the location of the minimum SLP and surface circulation center technically. This is what NHC is interested in.
4) I also wish they would have directly flew threw the MLC, but there could have been safety concerns about doing so. Not sure why they didn't. Often times they try to follow a pre-set flight plan that was made well before the obs showed the center was reforming.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking questions! I don't want to dismiss your insight, Aric, but I also want to point out the NHC is very good at what they do and many times recon has constraints/issues we don't know about.
caneman wrote:Looks like we could be losing power here in Clearwater. Seems to be on track for Tarpon Springs. Just North of Clearwater. If it does go in there or up the bay, It doesn't look like it would weaken before hand
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests