ATL: CRISTOBAL - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
okay, I better run and get my glasses because that seriously does appear as a shallow eye feature
2 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:okay, I better run and get my glasses because that seriously does appear as a shallow eye feature
that is the center lol..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- gfsperpendicular
- Category 1
- Posts: 383
- Age: 21
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:04 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:okay, I better run and get my glasses because that seriously does appear as a shallow eye feature
Lol I see it too! If you look at the last few vis frames you can see how a ring of hot towers formed near the center of the storm and then rotated around it for a bit.
But after all, it is a 45 mph storm.

0 likes
I'm not sleeping, I'm waiting for the 0900 UTC advisory!
#1 CMC stan
#1 CMC stan
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
There is definitely some odd northerly mid level shear.. easily noticable on IR. if that goes away it will have a easier time.
1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:There is definitely some odd northerly mid level shear.. easily noticable on IR. if that goes away it will have a easier time.
I believe that’s because of the trough coming in. Levi mentioned it in his latest video.
1 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3755
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
- Location: miami fl
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
all cloud been pull to ne north gulf and west are clear
0 likes
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:There is definitely some odd northerly mid level shear.. easily noticable on IR. if that goes away it will have a easier time.
It looks to me like the mid level reflection of the short wave trough over OK/TX is dropping SE and amplifying the downstream positive-tilt ridge over the NW GOMEX. With the ridge amplifying, winds on its east side (over the central GOMEX) are veering to north and starting to impinge on the mid level circulation of Cristobal. Not a whole lot, but enough to be noticeable on water vapor imagery.
3 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
last radar loop for the day. a 12 hour loop of our little friend.
still just drifting to the east.

still just drifting to the east.

1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
The NHC’s new forecast track has a really sharp turn to the SE/SSE soon...I don’t really see that happening with Cristobal’s current motion. We could see it hug the coast and not fully go onto land.
3 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 8245
- Age: 51
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I believe tonight isn't really the night for late-night model watching to see what this is going to do. Too early. Probably tomorrow night or Thursday night will be the time to stay up late to figure this one out.
4 likes
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
aspen wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:There is definitely some odd northerly mid level shear.. easily noticable on IR. if that goes away it will have a easier time.
I believe that’s because of the trough coming in. Levi mentioned it in his latest video.
Yep, this. You can see it both on WV and mid-level analyses.


5 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I'm surprised that the NHC is so bullish about Cristobal actually making landfall in Mexico. It's obviously very, extremely possible, but they seem almost certain. With the center moving at 1 mph, drifting and stalling, I'm not sure I'd be so bullish about a landfall.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
So wait. in no way is a "blend" of the measured data lower than the average, mean, medium , max and min and pretty much all other combinations..
lol
"52 kt and peak
SFMR winds of 45-47 kt. An automated Mexican weather station on an
elevated offshore platform has measured slightly stronger winds than
the SFMR, but a blend of these data support an initial intensity of
45 kt."
should be 50kts. lol
oh and 12 hours later it still is not moving south like the models or the forecast track.. but hey.. all good.
lol
"52 kt and peak
SFMR winds of 45-47 kt. An automated Mexican weather station on an
elevated offshore platform has measured slightly stronger winds than
the SFMR, but a blend of these data support an initial intensity of
45 kt."
should be 50kts. lol
oh and 12 hours later it still is not moving south like the models or the forecast track.. but hey.. all good.
1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
For some reason I was thinking the forecast for Cristobal was going to be much more ominous that it is, and then I forget it's only the first part of June, so I forget that any tropical disturbance in the Gulf in June is pretty significant....it should still be a pretty big rain-maker though, let's just hope it doesn't move slow enough to cause some flooding...
1 likes
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:So wait. in no way is a "blend" of the measured data lower than the average, mean, medium , max and min and pretty much all other combinations..
lol
"52 kt and peak
SFMR winds of 45-47 kt. An automated Mexican weather station on an
elevated offshore platform has measured slightly stronger winds than
the SFMR, but a blend of these data support an initial intensity of
45 kt."
should be 50kts. lol
oh and 12 hours later it still is not moving south like the models or the forecast track.. but hey.. all good.
Standard reductions established by Franklin, Black, & Valde from 925 mb is 0.75. Given flight level winds of only 52 kt, reductions are only good for about 40 kt. SFMR is a little higher, which seems to be the main basis of the NHC estimate to me. Elevated offshore platforms are just that: elevated, so those would need to be reduced from whatever elevation they are as well to come up with a 10 m equivalent. 45 kt looks very reasonable to me.
5 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 779
- Age: 26
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 10:34 pm
- Location: Monterrey, N.L, México
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
psyclone wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:It will be interesting if there's anything left of this storm once it emerges back out to sea(after the landfall). It seems like it's predicted to be over land for a decent amount of time. It will be interesting to see if it's able to maintain depression status or be a open wave once it re-merges into the gulf...
It's got a vigorous circulation so as long as it avoids mountains it will do just fine. It's developed quite nicely with part of the circulation over land
There are not near mountains, the nearest mountains are in Chiapas. Yucatán península is a very flat region with almost no height so tropical cyclones tend to maintein their strenght or they weaken a little while moving over there. No way this Will be affected by land after making landfall in Campeche
3 likes
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 16143
- Age: 27
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
ConvergenceZone wrote:For some reason I was thinking the forecast for Cristobal was going to be much more ominous that it is, and then I forget it's only the first part of June, so I forget that any tropical disturbance in the Gulf in June is pretty significant....it should still be a pretty big rain-maker though, let's just hope it doesn't move slow enough to cause some flooding...
I'd be careful. Depending how favorable conditions are in the Gulf of Mexico and how much this interacts with land, I could see this becoming stronger than one may expect for this time of year.
6 likes
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

saved sat loop
4 likes
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
We have quite a healthy looking tropical storm tonight.
1 likes
Re: ATL: CRISTOBAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Are there any massive Solar storms coming towards us in the next few days???? Those would could possibly effect this system and make it stronger.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests