ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145255
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1941 Postby cycloneye » Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:14 am

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1942 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:19 am

It’s funny how sw shear seems to pick up a little bit every night around the same time and then gradually ease as the day goes on. Is this the 3rd or 4th day in a row that this has happened?
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1943 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:25 am

Sam is a storm I would’ve expected between late August and mid September, not late September into early October. Who would’ve expected a 40 ACE long-tracking Cape Verde major intensifying to 130 kt at 28N/62W on October 1st?
5 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1944 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:26 am

Is there going to be another recon flight today?

Edit: AF307 is on the runaway.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2586
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1945 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:28 am

Sam actually looks better on dvorak now compared to the time when recon made the 147 FL kt measurements.

Dvorak when recon measured 147 kt FL:
Image

Now:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1946 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:38 am

kevin wrote:Sam actually looks better on dvorak now compared to the time when recon made the 147 FL kt measurements.

Dvorak when recon measured 147 kt FL:
https://i.imgur.com/7c7hk0v.jpg

Now:
https://i.imgur.com/oOzGRaH.jpg

Imagine if recon finds a Cat 5 lol.

147kt FL translates to 132kt at the surface, so if recon finds 150+ kt FL winds, that would justify at least 135 kt.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2586
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1947 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:40 am

aspen wrote:
kevin wrote:Sam actually looks better on dvorak now compared to the time when recon made the 147 FL kt measurements.

Dvorak when recon measured 147 kt FL:
https://i.imgur.com/7c7hk0v.jpg

Now:
https://i.imgur.com/oOzGRaH.jpg

Imagine if recon finds a Cat 5 lol.

147kt FL translates to 132kt at the surface, so if recon finds 150+ kt FL winds, that would justify at least 135 kt.


It would be the ultimate fairytale ending for Sam :lol:, just when everyone had given up hope. Not sure how likely it is, but we'll see soon enough. As you said in a previous post, recon just left and should arrive in 2 - 2.5 hours.
0 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1948 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:40 am

Definitely still strengthening
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2586
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1949 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:50 am

Current visual of Sam:

Image
3 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1950 Postby Shell Mound » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:55 am


While Sam is impressive for its latitude, I doubt that the 147-kt FL winds were mixing efficiently. Neither Dvorak nor IR has supported ≥ 130 kt. Before others mention Dorian, I would like to point out that Dorian’s CDO and eye were far more symmetric than Sam’s has been over the past few days. Dorian’s eye was also notably warmer and coincided with cooler cloud-tops than Sam’s has. If I were to analyse current imagery of Sam, including visible, I would assign MSW of ~105–115 kt at most. Sam isn’t even exhibiting a well-defined stadium effect, a telltale sign of a ≥ 130-kt TC. Therefore, I think all these high FL winds have been enhanced by factors other than convection, and have not been representative of Sam’s MSW at 10 m.
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1951 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:59 am

Shell Mound wrote:

While Sam is impressive for its latitude, I doubt that the 147-kt FL winds were mixing efficiently. Neither Dvorak nor IR has supported ≥ 130 kt. Before others mention Dorian, I would like to point out that Dorian’s CDO and eye were far more symmetric than Sam’s has been over the past few days. Dorian’s eye was also notably warmer and coincided with cooler cloud-tops than Sam’s has. If I were to analyse current imagery of Sam, including visible, I would assign MSW of ~105–115 kt at most. Sam isn’t even exhibiting a well-defined stadium effect, a telltale sign of a ≥ 130-kt TC. Therefore, I think all these high FL winds have been enhanced by factors other than convection, and have not been representative of Sam’s MSW at 10 m.

Why would they not be mixing efficiently. The storm is not sheared. Also Dvorak is less accurate than recon.
4 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2586
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1952 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:02 am

And just for more tropical storm candy, some great visuals of Sam's eye right now:

4 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1953 Postby RL3AO » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:02 am

I'm mostly here to see if Sam can get to the impressive 50 ACE level. Current forecast has it getting close.
4 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1954 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:06 am

Shell Mound wrote:

While Sam is impressive for its latitude, I doubt that the 147-kt FL winds were mixing efficiently. Neither Dvorak nor IR has supported ≥ 130 kt. Before others mention Dorian, I would like to point out that Dorian’s CDO and eye were far more symmetric than Sam’s has been over the past few days. Dorian’s eye was also notably warmer and coincided with cooler cloud-tops than Sam’s has. If I were to analyse current imagery of Sam, including visible, I would assign MSW of ~105–115 kt at most. Sam isn’t even exhibiting a well-defined stadium effect, a telltale sign of a ≥ 130-kt TC. Therefore, I think all these high FL winds have been enhanced by factors other than convection, and have not been representative of Sam’s MSW at 10 m.

I doubt the mixing factor is that inefficient. Surface winds of 115kt with FL winds of 147kt would mean a conversion rate of just 0.75, similar to storms that are interaction with troughs are are being baroclinically enhanced (like Isaias’ second peak). Sam doesn’t seem to be undergoing as much of an interaction yet. Also, the eye looks a lot better on visible than it has in days.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1955 Postby Shell Mound » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:12 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:

While Sam is impressive for its latitude, I doubt that the 147-kt FL winds were mixing efficiently. Neither Dvorak nor IR has supported ≥ 130 kt. Before others mention Dorian, I would like to point out that Dorian’s CDO and eye were far more symmetric than Sam’s has been over the past few days. Dorian’s eye was also notably warmer and coincided with cooler cloud-tops than Sam’s has. If I were to analyse current imagery of Sam, including visible, I would assign MSW of ~105–115 kt at most. Sam isn’t even exhibiting a well-defined stadium effect, a telltale sign of a ≥ 130-kt TC. Therefore, I think all these high FL winds have been enhanced by factors other than convection, and have not been representative of Sam’s MSW at 10 m.

Why would they not be mixing efficiently. The storm is not sheared. Also Dvorak is less accurate than recon.

This loop illustrates bouts of westerly shear that have hindered full consolidation over the past few days. The core has consistently been a bit lopsided (diagram).
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
Owasso
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:14 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1956 Postby Owasso » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:15 am

Image

Sam’s eye is drying out in a hurry.
2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1957 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:28 am

The best Sam has looked in days. A fantastic storm for this far north this late in the year. Recon might find a 135 kt storm at this rate.
Image
4 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3351
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1958 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:31 am

RL3AO wrote:I'm mostly here to see if Sam can get to the impressive 50 ACE level. Current forecast has it getting close.


If it can stay 130 knots for the rest of the day, it has a real shot. Haven't seen an Atlantic power machine like this since Irma.
3 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2586
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1959 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:32 am

Any idea why recon left earlier than expected (they weren't 'supposed to' leave until 15z, which is 30 minutes from now). Not complaining, just curious whether someone knows.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3351
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1960 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:34 am

Shell Mound wrote:

While Sam is impressive for its latitude, I doubt that the 147-kt FL winds were mixing efficiently. Neither Dvorak nor IR has supported ≥ 130 kt. Before others mention Dorian, I would like to point out that Dorian’s CDO and eye were far more symmetric than Sam’s has been over the past few days.


No offense, but your logic doesn't make any sense. Sam isn't nearly as strong as Dorian, that's confirmed by recon. So obviously, Sam isn't going to have nearly as symmetric of a CDO and eye. Sam doesn't need to be as strong as Dorian for the Dvorak estimates to be incorrect.
7 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests