
General idea is UKMET builds the ridge further west and connects it with the ridge in the Southwest US. This is plausible, GFS doesn't hook it up, but it probably shows why the gfs ensembles weight left.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
tolakram wrote:HWRF seems to be tracking 99L this time.
jasons2k wrote:
That’s still weighted to the left. Next operational may swing back west.
BobHarlem wrote:12z ukmet final frame, a bit right of the 0z... convergent point between GFS and UK is...
https://i.imgur.com/SVhYK01.png
jasons2k wrote:
That’s still weighted to the left. Next operational may swing back west.
BensonTCwatcher wrote:Holy smokes. There is enough clustering of the ensembles and enough overall agreement to be expecting some impacts anywhere from Houston to Lafayette - That's possible TC conditions along the coast Monday afternoon from a system that is is still not organized. It actually does look like a TS until Sunday. This will get crazy overnight Sunday and the average person won't be in full prep. 99L will definitely test the models on cyclogenesis. Like watching a really powerful firecracker's fuse burn down over the next few days. Boom or dud??? Better not be standing too close though.
Steve wrote:jasons2k wrote:
That’s still weighted to the left. Next operational may swing back west.
Hey Jason. That may happen. Let's don't forget that the ensembles were way too far west several times last year with Gulf landfalls. Not saying that's going to be the case with 99L, but it's worth noting.
HoustonFrog wrote:Steve wrote:jasons2k wrote:That’s still weighted to the left. Next operational may swing back west.
Hey Jason. That may happen. Let's don't forget that the ensembles were way too far west several times last year with Gulf landfalls. Not saying that's going to be the case with 99L, but it's worth noting.
When is last time a system in the west GOM trended west on the models? Pretty much always shifting east. I guess Laura had some slight shifts west before ultimately shifting back east near landfall
HoustonFrog wrote:Steve wrote:jasons2k wrote:That’s still weighted to the left. Next operational may swing back west.
Hey Jason. That may happen. Let's don't forget that the ensembles were way too far west several times last year with Gulf landfalls. Not saying that's going to be the case with 99L, but it's worth noting.
When is last time a system in the west GOM trended west on the models? Pretty much always shifting east. I guess Laura had some slight shifts west before ultimately shifting back east near landfall
Steve wrote:BensonTCwatcher wrote:Holy smokes. There is enough clustering of the ensembles and enough overall agreement to be expecting some impacts anywhere from Houston to Lafayette - That's possible TC conditions along the coast Monday afternoon from a system that is is still not organized. It actually does look like a TS until Sunday. This will get crazy overnight Sunday and the average person won't be in full prep. 99L will definitely test the models on cyclogenesis. Like watching a really powerful firecracker's fuse burn down over the next few days. Boom or dud??? Better not be standing too close though.
Back it up Terry...
BensonTCwatcher wrote:Steve wrote:BensonTCwatcher wrote:Holy smokes. There is enough clustering of the ensembles and enough overall agreement to be expecting some impacts anywhere from Houston to Lafayette - That's possible TC conditions along the coast Monday afternoon from a system that is is still not organized. It actually does look like a TS until Sunday. This will get crazy overnight Sunday and the average person won't be in full prep. 99L will definitely test the models on cyclogenesis. Like watching a really powerful firecracker's fuse burn down over the next few days. Boom or dud??? Better not be standing too close though.
Back it up Terry...
Don't know Terry...but if your asking me to back it up- It's not my forecast and I may have needed to state that, I was commenting what the models are developing not what will really happen here. We will see what verifies as Gulf storms don't have a track record of following models 5 days out- usually they outperform near the coast. In this case we get to see how well the models can be relied upon to predict cyclogenesis and development.
Steve wrote:BensonTCwatcher wrote:Steve wrote:
Back it up Terry...
Don't know Terry...but if your asking me to back it up- It's not my forecast and I may have needed to state that, I was commenting what the models are developing not what will really happen here. We will see what verifies as Gulf storms don't have a track record of following models 5 days out- usually they outperform near the coast. In this case we get to see how well the models can be relied upon to predict cyclogenesis and development.
Lol. I thought everyone knew that. It was a reference to the firecracker analogy. Just FYI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SVaHxJhTmk
Also CMC with the Back to Back Gulf storms. That would probably suck.
BobHarlem wrote:Clear as a brick wall
https://i.imgur.com/5EMr0Zl.png
BobHarlem wrote:Clear as a brick wall
https://i.imgur.com/5EMr0Zl.png
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests