ATL: LARRY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#481 Postby AlphaToOmega » Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:45 pm

105 knots/958 millibars
AL, 12, 2021090500, , BEST, 0, 177N, 475W, 105, 958, HU
0 likes   

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1406
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#482 Postby Ubuntwo » Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:47 pm

MJGarrison wrote:Thats interesting that it was developed off of West Pacific storms. If the Atlantic varies a bit, you’d think they could have a specific technique for the Atlantic. A lot of Atlantic storms get recon and so they get accurate wind data. That data plus the Dvorak number could easily create a more accurate Atlantic scale.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There’s variation in part of the basin and time of year which would complicate that. ETA was a really late season hurricane in the Western Caribbean so it was far weaker than Dvorak/cloud top temps would indicate. Vice versa here.
0 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#483 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:50 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/883769747546734642/50c49ebd-d8b7-420a-9900-448acdcba6cf.png

Still T5.0. Not convinced this is as strong as the NHC or well Papin says tbh.


Tropopause temperature is about -65C which matches up with the light grey cdo. Only the strongest updrafts are getting into the stratosphere which we can see with the blacks and whites rotating cyclonically. With the mediocre OHC I'm not sure this will get the cdo of -70 or -75 cloud tops. However since most of the Dvorak technique was developed based on West Pacific storms or off storms in the warmer parts of the Atlantic, I wouldn't be surprised if recon finds winds higher than the Dvorak estimates would suggest.

Does anyone remember if some of these category 4/5 storms in this part of the ocean like Isabel that have received recon have matched up with their Dvorak estimates?


I believe Isabel achieved an average T7.0 on September 11. Dropped down to T6.5 the following day, September 12.

https://i.imgur.com/sf4XmrX.png


Isabel didn’t have Recon at its first peak (which in truth was probably on the 11th) and quite frankly wouldn’t surprise me if it was quite similar to Irma/Dorian in intensity at its time just based on eye definition and overall symmetry. High end and warm eye open Atlantic storms can be weird like that because the tropopause is relatively warm. Isabel at its annular peak was a Recon confirmed Cat 5 despite just having a B ring along with a 17C eye (so probably T6.0).

However, there’s a major difference between this and Isabel. The eye is nowhere near as round despite similar CDO rings and even comparable eye temperatures. Not to mention Isabel’s CDO is definitely more smooth it.
Last edited by Yellow Evan on Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
9 likes   

User avatar
TheDreamTraveler
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:10 am
Location: PA

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#484 Postby TheDreamTraveler » Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:26 pm



Yeah we're in annular territory lol

Larry is shedding what's left of the spiral banding it has left
1 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#485 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:35 pm

Image
4 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#486 Postby supercane4867 » Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:23 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Tropopause temperature is about -65C which matches up with the light grey cdo. Only the strongest updrafts are getting into the stratosphere which we can see with the blacks and whites rotating cyclonically. With the mediocre OHC I'm not sure this will get the cdo of -70 or -75 cloud tops. However since most of the Dvorak technique was developed based on West Pacific storms or off storms in the warmer parts of the Atlantic, I wouldn't be surprised if recon finds winds higher than the Dvorak estimates would suggest.

Does anyone remember if some of these category 4/5 storms in this part of the ocean like Isabel that have received recon have matched up with their Dvorak estimates?


I believe Isabel achieved an average T7.0 on September 11. Dropped down to T6.5 the following day, September 12.

https://i.imgur.com/sf4XmrX.png


Isabel didn’t have Recon at its first peak (which in truth was probably on the 11th) and quite frankly wouldn’t surprise me if it was quite similar to Irma/Dorian in intensity at its time just based on eye definition and overall symmetry. High end and warm eye open Atlantic storms can be weird like that because the tropopause is relatively warm. Isabel at its annular peak was a Recon confirmed Cat 5 despite just having a B ring along with a 17C eye (so probably T6.0).

However, there’s a major difference between this and Isabel. The eye is nowhere near as round despite similar CDO rings and even comparable eye temperatures. Not to mention Isabel’s CDO is definitely more smooth it.


Satellite presentation of Isabel at her initial CAT5 peak FWIW. Isabel was one of the only 2 Atlantic hurricanes upgraded to CAT5 operationally based solely on Dvorak estimates (the other one being Lorenzo whose overall symmetry was a far cry from Isabel). The fact that she made NHC forecasters to pull the rare CAT5 trigger without any recon support, which was unprecedented at the time, really tells you something about her potential.

Image

Image

Image
13 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#487 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:28 pm

Starting to see some deeper convection going. Still feeling some shear though.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
CyclonicFury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2025
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:32 pm
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#488 Postby CyclonicFury » Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:44 pm

No longer expected to become a Category 4.
1 likes   
NCSU B.S. in Meteorology Class of 2021. Tropical weather blogger at http://www.cyclonicfury.com. My forecasts and thoughts are NOT official, for official forecasts please consult the National Hurricane Center.

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#489 Postby supercane4867 » Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:46 pm

Gonna give HWRF big credit for nailing the structure of Larry, but with the current structure in place it would be hard to see additional strengthening.

18z HWRF run keeps wind speed steady for the next 48hrs.
1 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#490 Postby Sciencerocks » Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:11 pm

Image
8 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#491 Postby Teban54 » Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:32 pm

I remember last year, at one point when Teddy was a Cat 2, it was also no longer forecast to become a Cat 4. So there's still a chance for Larry to intensify further.

That said, Larry's current appearance doesn't resemble a strengthening cyclone. Despite the stronger southern eyewall as per microwave, its eye remains ragged and CDO broken to the SW all day. Shear is likely having a bigger impact than expected.

A recent convective burst with -70C tops is trying to make it to the SW as I'm typing this... So we'll see how it goes.


Edit: Looks like that convective burst managed to wrap around and form a black ring, even though it might be unstable.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
5 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#492 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:26 pm

Image

T6.0.
4 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15979
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#493 Postby Kingarabian » Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:29 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
I believe Isabel achieved an average T7.0 on September 11. Dropped down to T6.5 the following day, September 12.

https://i.imgur.com/sf4XmrX.png


Isabel didn’t have Recon at its first peak (which in truth was probably on the 11th) and quite frankly wouldn’t surprise me if it was quite similar to Irma/Dorian in intensity at its time just based on eye definition and overall symmetry. High end and warm eye open Atlantic storms can be weird like that because the tropopause is relatively warm. Isabel at its annular peak was a Recon confirmed Cat 5 despite just having a B ring along with a 17C eye (so probably T6.0).

However, there’s a major difference between this and Isabel. The eye is nowhere near as round despite similar CDO rings and even comparable eye temperatures. Not to mention Isabel’s CDO is definitely more smooth it.


Satellite presentation of Isabel at her initial CAT5 peak FWIW. Isabel was one of the only 2 Atlantic hurricanes upgraded to CAT5 operationally based solely on Dvorak estimates (the other one being Lorenzo whose overall symmetry was a far cry from Isabel). The fact that she made NHC forecasters to pull the rare CAT5 trigger without any recon support, which was unprecedented at the time, really tells you something about her potential.

https://i.imgur.com/zJxuzaU.gif

https://i.imgur.com/nXXAehR.gif

[url]https://i.imgur.com/lNvuial.gif[/rl]


That's pretty much a W ring in BD imagery. With an eye that well defined and warm, Dvorak estimates had to have been at 7.0. I read somewhere thats what the consensus was near its peak.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#494 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:36 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:
Isabel didn’t have Recon at its first peak (which in truth was probably on the 11th) and quite frankly wouldn’t surprise me if it was quite similar to Irma/Dorian in intensity at its time just based on eye definition and overall symmetry. High end and warm eye open Atlantic storms can be weird like that because the tropopause is relatively warm. Isabel at its annular peak was a Recon confirmed Cat 5 despite just having a B ring along with a 17C eye (so probably T6.0).

However, there’s a major difference between this and Isabel. The eye is nowhere near as round despite similar CDO rings and even comparable eye temperatures. Not to mention Isabel’s CDO is definitely more smooth it.


Satellite presentation of Isabel at her initial CAT5 peak FWIW. Isabel was one of the only 2 Atlantic hurricanes upgraded to CAT5 operationally based solely on Dvorak estimates (the other one being Lorenzo whose overall symmetry was a far cry from Isabel). The fact that she made NHC forecasters to pull the rare CAT5 trigger without any recon support, which was unprecedented at the time, really tells you something about her potential.

https://i.imgur.com/zJxuzaU.gif

https://i.imgur.com/nXXAehR.gif

[url]https://i.imgur.com/lNvuial.gif[/rl]


That's pretty much a W ring in BD imagery. With an eye that well defined and warm, Dvorak estimates had to have been at 7.0. I read somewhere thats what the consensus was near its peak.


Yeah it’s one of two Atlantic FT’s of T7.0 ever that didn’t receive Recon, other being Igor.
5 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#495 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:48 am

Image

T5.5. B ring broke.
1 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#496 Postby supercane4867 » Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:51 am

With the ongoing symmetrization, 115-120kt peak by tomorrow seems reasonable

Image

Image
5 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#497 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Sun Sep 05, 2021 1:13 am

That was a short lived weakening phase. Larry back on intensification now.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#498 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Sep 05, 2021 1:51 am

TXNT27 KNES 050541
TCSNTL

A. 12L (LARRY)

B. 05/0531Z

C. 18.5N

D. 48.4W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T5.5/5.5

G. IR/EIR/SWIR

H. REMARKS...A WMG EYE SURROUNDED BY LG AND EMBEDDED IN LG YIELDS A
DT OF 5.5 AFTER AN EYE ADJ OF +0.5. MET IS EQUAL TO 6.0 AND PT IS EQUAL
5.5 BASED ON A DEVELOPMENT TREND IN THE LAST 24 HOURS. FT IS BASED ON DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...TUGGLE
0 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#499 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Sep 05, 2021 2:09 am

nice broad view! Kind of reminds me of Igor 2010, Bill 2009

Image
Last edited by Sciencerocks on Sun Sep 05, 2021 2:18 am, edited 3 times in total.
6 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: LARRY - Hurricane - Discussion

#500 Postby Teban54 » Sun Sep 05, 2021 2:14 am

Teban54 wrote:I remember last year, at one point when Teddy was a Cat 2, it was also no longer forecast to become a Cat 4. So there's still a chance for Larry to intensify further.

That said, Larry's current appearance doesn't resemble a strengthening cyclone. Despite the stronger southern eyewall as per microwave, its eye remains ragged and CDO broken to the SW all day. Shear is likely having a bigger impact than expected.

A recent convective burst with -70C tops is trying to make it to the SW as I'm typing this... So we'll see how it goes.


Edit: Looks like that convective burst managed to wrap around and form a black ring, even though it might be unstable.

So intensification resumed right after I made the reply... Oof.
0 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests