ATL: NICHOLAS - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#81 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:04 pm

It's odd that that the 18Z GFS is further west and north initially through 66 hours and is just offshore Galveston but ends up making landfall further east than the 18Z run.
0 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#82 Postby Clearcloudz » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:13 pm

00Z GFS stalls storm in Louisiana.


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#83 Postby Clearcloudz » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:21 pm

If the 00Z GFS is correct on this solution then this will most likely be a non event for all of Texas may see a few inches of rain but nothing major.

Image
0 likes   

jaguars_22
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:26 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#84 Postby jaguars_22 » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:24 pm

Why are the gfs ensembles still further west? They show it landfalling in texas
Last edited by jaguars_22 on Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#85 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:24 pm

Clearcloudz wrote:If the 00Z GFS is correct on this solution then this will most likely be a non event for all of Texas may see a few inches of rain but nothing major.

https://i.imgur.com/jrBtKhs.png


Except for Galveston Island getting TS force winds but yes for areas further inland like Harris County it would not be much.
1 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#86 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:26 pm

jaguars_22 wrote:Why are the gfs ensembles still further west? They show it landfalling in texas


Because at the moment the GFS is an eastern outlier no other models show it getting that far east so it is reasonable to think that the GEFS will be more in line with the consensus from other models. Things can change quickly though and the GFS could be onto something.
0 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#87 Postby Clearcloudz » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:28 pm

IcyTundra wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:If the 00Z GFS is correct on this solution then this will most likely be a non event for all of Texas may see a few inches of rain but nothing major.

https://i.imgur.com/jrBtKhs.png


Except for Galveston Island getting TS force winds but yes for areas further inland like Harris County it would not be much.


Yes Coastal regions will get some solid impacts but the system is small so there will be sharp cutoff. But I'm not sure if the GFS is correct on this storm.
0 likes   

jaguars_22
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:26 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#88 Postby jaguars_22 » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:28 pm

The gfs got down to a 979 this last run what would the winds be?
0 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#89 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:30 pm

Clearcloudz wrote:
IcyTundra wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:If the 00Z GFS is correct on this solution then this will most likely be a non event for all of Texas may see a few inches of rain but nothing major.

https://i.imgur.com/jrBtKhs.png


Except for Galveston Island getting TS force winds but yes for areas further inland like Harris County it would not be much.


Yes Coastal regions will get some solid impacts but the system is small so there will be sharp cutoff. But I'm not sure if the GFS is correct on this storm.


I am not buying it either too far east and it is the only model showing it getting that far east. But these things can change quickly and the other models could start to shift towards the GFS or the GFS could shift back further west. By this time tomorrow I am hoping we will have a good idea of what will happen.
0 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#90 Postby Clearcloudz » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:30 pm

I also want to mention the stronger this storm gets early on, the more eastward it will end up so Louisiana is in play more than people think. Short term strength is big question mark because the storm hasn't even formed yet.
1 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#91 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:32 pm

jaguars_22 wrote:The gfs got down to a 979 this last run what would the winds be?


In general a minimum central pressure of 979 mb would suggest a fairly strong cat 1 approaching cat 2 status, but every storm is different and storms can have lower or higher winds than expected for the pressure it has.
Last edited by IcyTundra on Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

jaguars_22
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:26 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#92 Postby jaguars_22 » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:35 pm

I don’t think the gfs has a good idea on this storm. I could be wrong but I believe I still see the storm headed back west at hour 216… Oklahoma area :(
If that high builds back in this thing could sit in Texas somewhere for a while
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#93 Postby Stormcenter » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:36 pm

Looks what ever may be developing is doing
it a little further east than previously thought.
1 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#94 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:40 pm

jaguars_22 wrote:I don’t think the gfs has a good idea on this storm. I could be wrong but I believe I still see the storm headed back west at hour 216… Oklahoma area :(
If that high builds back in this thing could sit in Texas somewhere for a while


GFS is likely wrong about the strength of the storm I don't see it strengthening down to 979 MB, but as we all know all bets are off in terms of intensity with a tropical cyclone in the Gulf of Mexico in September. If 94L can find a pocket of lower wind shear in the gulf and if conditions are slightly more favorable than the models have been suggesting in recent days then some decent strengthening isn't out of the question.
0 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#95 Postby Clearcloudz » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:54 pm

Huge shift on 00Z GEFS Ensemble compared to 18Z

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

18Z
Image

00Z
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman22
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:39 am
Location: Houston,Tx
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#96 Postby wxman22 » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:58 pm

Clearcloudz wrote:Huge shift on 00Z GEFS Ensemble compared to 18Z

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

18Z
https://i.imgur.com/12MEnjQ.png

00Z
https://i.imgur.com/Lw4sAnn.png

I don't see a huge shift there... They just look tighter together which means they may be honing down on a landfall location.
3 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#97 Postby Clearcloudz » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:59 pm

wxman22 wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:Huge shift on 00Z GEFS Ensemble compared to 18Z

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

18Z
https://i.imgur.com/12MEnjQ.png

00Z
https://i.imgur.com/Lw4sAnn.png

I don't see a huge shift there... They just look tighter together which means they may be honing down on a landfall location.


Bottom picture is the 00Z run, 18Z was tighter
Last edited by Clearcloudz on Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#98 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Sep 11, 2021 11:59 pm

Clearcloudz wrote:Huge shift on 00Z GEFS Ensemble compared to 18Z

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

18Z
https://i.imgur.com/12MEnjQ.png

00Z
https://i.imgur.com/Lw4sAnn.png


Looks about the same to me expect for the fact that none of the ensemble members take it into Louisiana which makes me question if the GFS is out for lunch or if it is onto something and we will see the ensemble members shift further east tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#99 Postby Clearcloudz » Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:03 am

IcyTundra wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:Huge shift on 00Z GEFS Ensemble compared to 18Z

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

18Z
https://i.imgur.com/12MEnjQ.png

00Z
https://i.imgur.com/Lw4sAnn.png


Looks about the same to me expect for the fact that none of the ensemble members take it into Louisiana which makes me question if the GFS is out for lunch or if it is onto something and we will see the ensemble members shift further east tomorrow.


I don't know to me it seems ensembles shifted west but I could be wrong.
1 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#100 Postby IcyTundra » Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:05 am

Clearcloudz wrote:
IcyTundra wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:Huge shift on 00Z GEFS Ensemble compared to 18Z

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

18Z
https://i.imgur.com/12MEnjQ.png

00Z
https://i.imgur.com/Lw4sAnn.png


Looks about the same to me expect for the fact that none of the ensemble members take it into Louisiana which makes me question if the GFS is out for lunch or if it is onto something and we will see the ensemble members shift further east tomorrow.


I don't know to me it seems ensembles shifted west but I could be wrong.

Looks like a very slight shift west for the ensemble mean to me too. We won't have a very good idea about that track until we get a closed low.
1 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests