
https://s4.gifyu.com/images/39217846.gif
Moderator: S2k Moderators
rnj79 wrote:Craters wrote:LARanger wrote:
New one on me, and I'm iffy on whether it's "a thing", but now I want to see something similar for Louisiana.
Ask and you shall receive, LARanger:
[url]https://i.ibb.co/ryRX7gF/Cajun-boxes.jpg [/url]
(I think the US boundaries are a little bit off...)
As an "Hebert" living in SELA, this gave me a good chuckle. Thanks for the laugh!
kevin wrote:And so TD9 joins a small group of storms to have a 95 kt or higher value in their first forecast. Here are all the other storms from that list since the modern advisory archives started in 1998. Of the previous storms with such a forecast 6 of the 9 eventually became MHs. It also makes TD9 the most aggressive forecast (at least since 1998) which includes Florida in its first cone. I hope it won't be as bad as some models show, but this really shows the uniqueness of TD9. So if you're in the area that could be affected I'd highly encourage you to prepare today or tomorrow before the remaining millions of people also realize they have to prepare.
100 kt
Sam - 2021
Tomas - 2010
95 kt
TD9 - 2022
Ida - 2021
Iota - 2020
Lorenzo - 2019
Isaac - 2012
Danielle - 2010
Philippe - 2005
Karl - 2004
kevin wrote:And so TD9 joins a small group of storms to have a 95 kt or higher value in their first forecast. Here are all the other storms from that list since the modern advisory archives started in 1998. Of the previous storms with such a forecast 6 of the 9 eventually became MHs. It also makes TD9 the most aggressive forecast (at least since 1998) which includes Florida in its first cone. I hope it won't be as bad as some models show, but this really shows the uniqueness of TD9. So if you're in the area that could be affected I'd highly encourage you to prepare today or tomorrow before the remaining millions of people also realize they have to prepare.
100 kt
Sam - 2021
Tomas - 2010
95 kt
TD9 - 2022
Ida - 2021
Iota - 2020
Lorenzo - 2019
Isaac - 2012
Danielle - 2010
Philippe - 2005
Karl - 2004
hiflyer wrote:jlauderdal wrote:ObsessedMiami wrote:Time to dust off the old login for this year
NWS Miami forecast calls for Tropical Storm conditions possible for Tuesday night
Should be an interesting weekend here in South Florida
TS winds knockout power where I live, the lines are overhead, roh roh. Filling the gas cans in the next hour, enough for 10 days, the new generator(inverter) sips gas while the old one made the gas companies some real money. I'm preparing for a major hurricane in SE Florida, hopefully, my preps are overkill.
Out here in Broward/Weston FPL has been working on the overhead main lines with improved towers as part of their multiyear hardening. Communities are all underground. Some models appear to soften onshore sw Fl to a 1 to low 2 on a NE trajectory. Publix then a refresh lube spray on the shutters over the weekend.
kevin wrote:Tons of 40+ kt SFMR measurements in TD9 so it certanly qualifies as a TS in that regard. The question is whether it has a well-defined center & circulation which is deemed organized enough to upgrade it already.
jlauderdal wrote:ObsessedMiami wrote:Time to dust off the old login for this year
NWS Miami forecast calls for Tropical Storm conditions possible for Tuesday night
Should be an interesting weekend here in South Florida
TS winds knockout power where I live, the lines are overhead, roh roh. Filling the gas cans in the next hour, enough for 10 days, the new generator(inverter) sips gas while the old one made the gas companies some real money. I'm preparing for a major hurricane in SE Florida, hopefully, my preps are overkill.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:kevin wrote:Tons of 40+ kt SFMR measurements in TD9 so it certanly qualifies as a TS in that regard. The question is whether it has a well-defined center & circulation which is deemed organized enough to upgrade it already.
That's not in question. It's already a TD, so if TS winds are found, they'll upgrade to TS Hermine.
AJC3 wrote:'The center hasn't even formed yet' talk is quickly on its way to becoming null and void from here on out. In fact, this morning's scatterometer data (13Z-14Z) and satellite derived winds showed a pretty well-defined surface-850MB vorticity center that should have gone into the initialization of the 18Z model guidance, and I suspect it will be at least as well-defined in the upcoming 00Z runs. How well the model guidance initializes it is another matter, however we're at the point now where we have a decent LL center fix to work with.
AJC3 wrote:AJC3 wrote:'The center hasn't even formed yet' talk is quickly on its way to becoming null and void from here on out. In fact, this morning's scatterometer data (13Z-14Z) and satellite derived winds showed a pretty well-defined surface-850MB vorticity center that should have gone into the initialization of the 18Z model guidance, and I suspect it will be at least as well-defined in the upcoming 00Z runs. How well the model guidance initializes it is another matter, however we're at the point now where we have a decent LL center fix to work with.
Welp, another related issue seems to have reared its head. Based on the the last few hours of 3.9UM IR and vis imagery, it appears that the erstwhile "well defined" center has degenerated into multiple smaller eddies, one of which you can see rotating northward in some of the post-sunrise vis imagery posted above by Mark. This is a product of the high shear displacing the convection (and thus the latent heat release) downshear of said LLC. IMO this would support the likelihood of one or more downshear center reformations today. We'll see if this comes to fruition.
caneman wrote:AJC3 wrote:AJC3 wrote:'The center hasn't even formed yet' talk is quickly on its way to becoming null and void from here on out. In fact, this morning's scatterometer data (13Z-14Z) and satellite derived winds showed a pretty well-defined surface-850MB vorticity center that should have gone into the initialization of the 18Z model guidance, and I suspect it will be at least as well-defined in the upcoming 00Z runs. How well the model guidance initializes it is another matter, however we're at the point now where we have a decent LL center fix to work with.
Welp, another related issue seems to have reared its head. Based on the the last few hours of 3.9UM IR and vis imagery, it appears that the erstwhile "well defined" center has degenerated into multiple smaller eddies, one of which you can see rotating northward in some of the post-sunrise vis imagery posted above by Mark. This is a product of the high shear displacing the convection (and thus the latent heat release) downshear of said LLC. IMO this would support the likelihood of one or more downshear center reformations today. We'll see if this comes to fruition.
And if this were to happen would that make it eject more quickly to the east or track further to west?
sooo…. Westward shifts in modeling could be in the offing for later today?AJC3 wrote:caneman wrote:AJC3 wrote:
Welp, another related issue seems to have reared its head. Based on the the last few hours of 3.9UM IR and vis imagery, it appears that the erstwhile "well defined" center has degenerated into multiple smaller eddies, one of which you can see rotating northward in some of the post-sunrise vis imagery posted above by Mark. This is a product of the high shear displacing the convection (and thus the latent heat release) downshear of said LLC. IMO this would support the likelihood of one or more downshear center reformations today. We'll see if this comes to fruition.
And if this were to happen would that make it eject more quickly to the east or track further to west?
In the short term, of course more westward. Probably in the longer term as well, but that depends more on the amplitude/position/orientation of the trough that's forecast to turn this N and NE. Still a long way to go to speculate too much on this.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests