EPAC: JOVA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15461
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#121 Postby Kingarabian » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:48 pm

Teban54 wrote: Genuine question: Given that Raw ADT is shooting up but the adjusted, constrained values are lagging, is it possible that we're looking at an Eta situation?

IIRC, Eta's raw T got up to 8.3 while final T stayed below 7. Before the underwhelming recon went in, people were saying the exact same thing as this - that the constraints are to ensure storms don't intensify too fast, which didn't apply to ERI phases like Eta. However, recon found Eta to be just a 130 kt Cat 4, in line with the final T.

I would break constraints when going Cat.1 to Cat.3. Cat.3 to Cat.5 I need to see a CI near T6.5 and instantaneous T7.0's. Safest way to go about it. That being said, it will qualify for a cat.5 very soon.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#122 Postby Hurricane2022 » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:50 pm

It seems that Eta's incredible failure still traumatizes many people. I'm sure not every hurricane like Jova, which has a powerful pinhole eye, is like Eta, and possibly Rai, which also had very tiny eyes.
Teban54 wrote:Genuine question: Given that Raw ADT is shooting up but the adjusted, constrained values are lagging, is it possible that we're looking at an Eta situation?

IIRC, Eta's raw T got up to 8.3 while final T stayed below 7. Before the underwhelming recon went in, people were saying the exact same thing as this - that the constraints are to ensure storms don't intensify too fast, which didn't apply to ERI phases like Eta. However, recon found Eta to be just a 130 kt Cat 4, in line with the final T.

I could certainly be talking nonsense here, but if we follow that reasoning, I think we could judge that Wilma '05 probably didn't have its famous intensity of 160 kt/882 mb (confirmed by reconnaissance), but somewhere around 135 - 145 knots . Satellite estimates often mislead us, but always claiming that satellites are overestimating, as in this case of Jova, could perhaps be a mistake.
2 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

Una cvm Christo, pro Christo, et in Christo. Sit nomen Domini benedictvm.

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15461
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#123 Postby Kingarabian » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:53 pm

Hurricane2022 wrote:It seems that Eta's incredible failure still traumatizes many people. I'm sure not every hurricane like Jova, which has a powerful pinhole eye, is like Eta, and possibly Rai, which also had very tiny eyes.
Teban54 wrote:Genuine question: Given that Raw ADT is shooting up but the adjusted, constrained values are lagging, is it possible that we're looking at an Eta situation?

IIRC, Eta's raw T got up to 8.3 while final T stayed below 7. Before the underwhelming recon went in, people were saying the exact same thing as this - that the constraints are to ensure storms don't intensify too fast, which didn't apply to ERI phases like Eta. However, recon found Eta to be just a 130 kt Cat 4, in line with the final T.

I could certainly be talking nonsense here, but if we follow that reasoning, I think we could judge that Wilma '05 probably didn't have its famous intensity of 160 kt/882 mb (confirmed by reconnaissance), but somewhere around 135 - 145 knots . Satellite estimates often mislead us, but always claiming that satellites are overestimating, as in this case of Jova, could perhaps be a mistake.

I agree here. I think Teban54 is saying to hold off on calling for a cat.5 until Dvorak/winds catch up. Dvorak is catching up though and will qualify on the scale very soon.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 21565
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#124 Postby Ntxw » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:53 pm

Outside of the extreme storms, this is as easy as you can get.

Image

Image
2 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15461
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#125 Postby Kingarabian » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:54 pm

Microwave passes over the system should be up soon.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33398
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#126 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:55 pm

I'd go with 135 kt right now. This is well on its way to top-end status, but I'd want to see a warmer eye first. Still, a Special Advisory may be warranted, to raise the forecast intensity upward (I'd peak it at 155 kt).

I have to wonder...could we start seeing CDG wrap all the way around? Only the most legendary storms do that.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#127 Postby Hurricane2022 » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:55 pm

aspen wrote:No special advisory it seems. Didn’t another EPac major this season get a special advisory? There’s no reason not to do one for Jova, whose current intensity estimate is likely 20-30 kt too low.

I think until at least 01:00z we could expect the NHC to issue a special advisory for Jova
0 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

Una cvm Christo, pro Christo, et in Christo. Sit nomen Domini benedictvm.

Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 21565
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#128 Postby Ntxw » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:56 pm

UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.1
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 06 SEP 2023 Time : 231020 UTC
Lat : 15:10:12 N Lon : 112:17:24 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
5.8 / 953.1mb/109.8kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
5.8 5.9 7.6

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR :N/A km

Center Temp : +15.5C Cloud Region Temp : -76.5C

Scene Type : EYE
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K


User avatar
TorSkk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:08 am

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#129 Postby TorSkk » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:57 pm

7.0

TXPZ27 KNES 062348
TCSENP

A. 11E (JOVA)

B. 06/2330Z

C. 15.2N

D. 112.3W

E. ONE/GOES-W

F. T7.0/7.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...WMG EYE IS SURROUNDED BY AND EMBEDDED IN CMG RESULTING
IN A DT OF 7.5 AFTER ADDING 1.0 FOR AN EYE ADJUSTMENT. THE MET IS 5.0
BASED ON RAPID DEVELOPMENT AND THE PT IS 5.5. THE FT IS BASED ON THE 6
HOUR AVERAGE DT OF 6.9, WHICH JUSTIFIES BREAKING CONSTRAINTS.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...TURK
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#130 Postby Hurricane2022 » Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:59 pm

Image
0 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

Una cvm Christo, pro Christo, et in Christo. Sit nomen Domini benedictvm.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15960
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#131 Postby Yellow Evan » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:03 pm

TorSkk wrote:7.0

TXPZ27 KNES 062348
TCSENP

A. 11E (JOVA)

B. 06/2330Z

C. 15.2N

D. 112.3W

E. ONE/GOES-W

F. T7.0/7.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...WMG EYE IS SURROUNDED BY AND EMBEDDED IN CMG RESULTING
IN A DT OF 7.5 AFTER ADDING 1.0 FOR AN EYE ADJUSTMENT. THE MET IS 5.0
BASED ON RAPID DEVELOPMENT AND THE PT IS 5.5. THE FT IS BASED ON THE 6
HOUR AVERAGE DT OF 6.9, WHICH JUSTIFIES BREAKING CONSTRAINTS.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...TURK


NHC probably goes 140 if TAFB matches.
2 likes   

Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 21565
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#132 Postby Ntxw » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:21 pm

Very warm eye now. I'd give it 140kts right now.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K


bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1667
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#133 Postby bob rulz » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:22 pm

Remarkable storm. Went to bed last night with this having just reached cat 1. Come home today and it looks like a borderline cat 5. I wish the NHC would send recon into a system like this even if it is no threat to land.
1 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1966
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#134 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:23 pm

Yellow Evan, it seems I stand corrected. Looking at this, it is very possibly a category 5, or soon will be.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
galaxy401
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2300
Age: 29
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Location: Casa Grande, Arizona

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#135 Postby galaxy401 » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:27 pm

If this does reach Category 5 in the next advisory, will this be the fastest a storm goes from being a Tropical Depression to a Cat 5?
0 likes   
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139593
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#136 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:37 pm

155 mph

EP, 11, 2023090700, , BEST, 0, 153N, 1124W, 135, 933, HU
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4623
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#137 Postby ElectricStorm » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:40 pm

135kts probably isn't a bad estimate for now but it should be 140kts+ by the advisory in a couple hours. Hopefully they upgrade it then
1 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

MarioProtVI
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 675
Age: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#138 Postby MarioProtVI » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:44 pm

I’m probably gonna get clowned for this but I really do not see them upgrading to Cat 5 here and chances are it’s peaking right now (meaning degradation or EWRC occurring - something the microwave seems to be hinting towards with that outer band). They’ve basically been terrified of doing so since Iota (even though that was a legitimate C5 and was probably one earlier then NHC thought).
3 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#139 Postby Hurricane2022 » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:46 pm

cycloneye wrote:155 mph

EP, 11, 2023090700, , BEST, 0, 153N, 1124W, 135, 933, HU

JTWC would likely classify this as a C5 STY...
0 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

Una cvm Christo, pro Christo, et in Christo. Sit nomen Domini benedictvm.

Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 21565
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: EPAC: JOVA - Hurricane - Discussion

#140 Postby Ntxw » Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:48 pm

MarioProtVI wrote:I’m probably gonna get clowned for this but I really do not see them upgrading to Cat 5 here and chances are it’s peaking right now (meaning degradation or EWRC occurring - something the microwave seems to be hinting towards with that outer band). They’ve basically been terrified of doing so since Iota (even though that was a legitimate C5 and was probably one earlier then NHC thought).


It will be interesting as Lee intensifies soon and we can compare with recon. If it achieves C5 over there with less, it will be tough to justify, but of course that's the benefit of recon. A lot of ifs though.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K



Return to “2023”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests