ATL: IDALIA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 508
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#321 Postby hohnywx » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:16 pm

Hurricane2022 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I'm thinking NHC will call it a TD and predict landfall north of Tampa just east of the big bend as a 55kt or 60kt TS on their first advisory. Could be some significant rain and wind into the Tampa area Wednesday morning. It emerges offshore S. Carolina late Wednesday and might have a shot at becoming stronger as it tracks slowly away from the coast. We'll see in a couple of hours.

https://imageshack.com/i/poeSGmCUj


Bravo!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#322 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:16 pm

wxman57 wrote:
xironman wrote:The buoy in the channel has had strong west winds for hours

https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page. ... t=E&tz=EST


The southern band of squalls was passing earlier. It's outside the squalls now, but a SW wind is consistent with TD status. NHC may want to get recon in it before calling it a TD or TS. Anyone know when recon is scheduled?


I posted it on the 93L recon thread, but I can tell you on Sunday morning at 6 AM.


https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 7#p3036557
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9288
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: Advisories later today if trend continues

#323 Postby Iceresistance » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:18 pm

zhukm29 wrote:
chaser1 wrote:


You can't make this stuff up :hehe:


Here is my favorite picture for this: this was from a week ago with the trio of Emily, Franklin, and Gert (before they developed).

https://i.ibb.co/DLbfbKd/ascat.png

Good grief! That is ridiculous! I'm actually glad you kept that image!
2 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#324 Postby wxman57 » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:19 pm

aspen wrote:
zzzh wrote:
AL, 93, 2023082618, , BEST, 0, 211N, 861W, 25, 1006, DB,

Doubt they are going to upgrade it at 5.

At the very least we should get a PTC. The 2pm TWO said that advisories will be initiated later today if development trends continue.


No necessarily will a PTC be issued. A PTC will be issued if a disturbance has both a high chance of development within 48 hrs (check) and there is a need for TS watches (no check) for arrival of TS winds on land within 48 hrs. Any TS wind into FL will not be until Tuesday PM at the earliest, so second qualification is not met for PTC advisories. That is, unless the forecast is for TS wind near the NE Yucatan, which is well within 48 hrs. Glad I don't have to follow their forecast criteria. We made the call yesterday morning to start advisories.
2 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#325 Postby wxman57 » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:21 pm

cycloneye wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
xironman wrote:The buoy in the channel has had strong west winds for hours

https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page. ... t=E&tz=EST


The southern band of squalls was passing earlier. It's outside the squalls now, but a SW wind is consistent with TD status. NHC may want to get recon in it before calling it a TD or TS. Anyone know when recon is scheduled?


I posted it on the 93L recon thread, but I can tell you on Sunday morning at 6 AM.

https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 7#p3036557


You can't tell me until Sunday morning, Luis? ;-) (Airplane...)
3 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#326 Postby SFLcane » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:22 pm

Sounds like a pretty sheared mess incoming in the gulf per Wxman.
0 likes   

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#327 Postby robbielyn » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:27 pm

How many I storms were nothing burgers?
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

typhoonty
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 121
Age: 30
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 10:37 pm
Location: Fort Myers / Tallahassee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#328 Postby typhoonty » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:28 pm

LandoWill wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Satellite imagery is suggestive of at least a TD and quite possibly a TS. However, wind to its west in Cancun is NNW at only 5 kts. We have seen systems in the past that look like tropical storms on satellite, but recon can't close off a well-defined circulation. In this case, I think it's a TD and NHC will start advisories in a couple hours. As for landfall intensity, it does look like SW wind shear increases the farther north it tracks. The environment across the NE Gulf may not be favorable enough for a hurricane to survive. Lots of southwest wind shear north of 25N. Our shift forecaster wanted to go 65-70 kts at landfall, but we talked him down from the ledge until we're more confident. Always better to start low and go stronger than the other way around.

I'm thinking NHC will call it a TD and predict landfall north of Tampa just east of the big bend as a 55kt or 60kt TS on their first advisory. Could be some significant rain and wind into the Tampa area Wednesday morning. It emerges offshore S. Carolina late Wednesday and might have a shot at becoming stronger as it tracks slowly away from the coast. We'll see in a couple of hours.

po
Feel like I’ve seen this exact scenario before and I did not like how it turned out…

The Tampa shields always work, pray for those in the big bend/panhandle.


The "Tampa Shield" will work until it doesn't. I moved up to Tampa from Fort Myers post Ian. Saying that there is a shield breeds complacency for when the shield finally breaks, and it WILL break.
4 likes   
FSU Meteorology student, opinions are mine, 20 years experience covering TC's, consult NHC/Local officials when making decisions.

Gabrielle '01, Michelle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Dennis '05, Katrina '05, Rita '05, Wilma '05, Fay '08, Isaac '12 Hermine '16, Irma '17, Michael '18, Eta '20, Elsa '21, IAN '22, Idalia '23, Debby '24, Helene '24

skillz305
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 11:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida --> Vero Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#329 Postby skillz305 » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:28 pm

Whenever WX is bearish, in my experience, he has always been correct.
0 likes   
:flag:Hurricanes: Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Katrina 2005 - Wilma 2005 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#330 Postby IcyTundra » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:30 pm

skillz305 wrote:Whenever WX is bearish, in my experience, he has always been correct.


Only time I remember him being being bearish and wrong was with Michael but everyone was wrong about Michael.
1 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#331 Postby chaser1 » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:30 pm

aspen wrote:
zzzh wrote:
AL, 93, 2023082618, , BEST, 0, 211N, 861W, 25, 1006, DB,

Doubt they are going to upgrade it at 5.

At the very least we should get a PTC. The 2pm TWO said that advisories will be initiated later today if development trends continue.


The pace of contractions have eased and dialation seems to have paused at about 4 centimeters. I dont see any evidence of our little girl's (Idalia) head cresting quite yet LOL. Seriously though, it appears that cloud tops have recently warmed. I still havn't seen any bouy data indicating wind gusts over 20 mph. NHC could have kicked this to a TD hours ago, thus I'm not sure why they would suddenly choose to do so an hour from now. There's typically a delay between pressure falls and increase in wind speed. Perhaps they will put off any upgrade until they at least begin to see new convection and colder cloud tops fire up over the supposed center, along with some evidence of any increase in wind speeds. Maybe that occurs by mid or late evening. As it is, I dont think their quite at the window where PTC advisories have to be hoisted yet.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

MarioProtVI
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#332 Postby MarioProtVI » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:31 pm

SFLcane wrote:Sounds like a pretty sheared mess incoming in the gulf per Wxman.

We’ll see how accurate this pans out next week :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#333 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:31 pm

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9288
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#334 Postby Iceresistance » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:31 pm

robbielyn wrote:How many I storms were nothing burgers?

Imelda 2019 and Isaias 2020, only impactful I storms to be not retired in the past few years.
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

typhoonty
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 121
Age: 30
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 10:37 pm
Location: Fort Myers / Tallahassee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#335 Postby typhoonty » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:33 pm

skillz305 wrote:Whenever WX is bearish, in my experience, he has always been correct.


I wouldn't say he's being bearish here. 55-60 kts was largely seen as 93L's ceiling 48 hours ago. He's been far more bearish before.
5 likes   
FSU Meteorology student, opinions are mine, 20 years experience covering TC's, consult NHC/Local officials when making decisions.

Gabrielle '01, Michelle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Dennis '05, Katrina '05, Rita '05, Wilma '05, Fay '08, Isaac '12 Hermine '16, Irma '17, Michael '18, Eta '20, Elsa '21, IAN '22, Idalia '23, Debby '24, Helene '24

zzzh
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 834
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#336 Postby zzzh » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:36 pm


That product is not reliable.
0 likes   

skillz305
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 11:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida --> Vero Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#337 Postby skillz305 » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:37 pm

typhoonty wrote:
skillz305 wrote:Whenever WX is bearish, in my experience, he has always been correct.


I wouldn't say he's being bearish here. 55-60 kts was largely seen as 93L's ceiling 48 hours ago. He's been far more bearish before.



Valid. A week ago, model runs on Franklin showed this happening in the GOM. It’s just all playing out.
2 likes   
:flag:Hurricanes: Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Katrina 2005 - Wilma 2005 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#338 Postby chaser1 » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:38 pm

Iceresistance wrote:
robbielyn wrote:How many I storms were nothing burgers?

Imelda 2019 and Isaias 2020, only impactful I storms to be not retired in the past few years.


Which raises a quick question. Anyone know what was the weakest named storm to have it's name retired??
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
HurricaneBelle
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
Location: Clearwater, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#339 Postby HurricaneBelle » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:38 pm

Once again we're in the dreaded "storm potentially paralleling the coast" scenario, in which tenths of a degree difference in longitude will make a huge difference as to who gets a direct hit from the Pandhandle to SWFL. Forget the cone, which is not a measure of impact, and prepare anywhere along the FL Gulf coast.

Hopefully Ian taught everyone a lesson in this regard.
3 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#340 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:40 pm

chaser1 wrote:
Iceresistance wrote:
robbielyn wrote:How many I storms were nothing burgers?

Imelda 2019 and Isaias 2020, only impactful I storms to be not retired in the past few years.


Which raises a quick question. Anyone know what was the weakest named storm to have it's name retired??

Allison and Erika are the only two TS to have their names retired
2 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.


Return to “2023”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests