
ATL: KIRK - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye now at 20.99°C. CDO expanding.


6 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Textbook Cat 5. And I thought Gilma’s peak estimates were bad lol
5 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 20
- Age: 18
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2024 5:16 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
5 likes
My posts are not official forecasts, just guesses. For accurate information, visit the NHC or NWS websites instead.
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
And there we have it, ADT CI# reaches 7.0 on a “125kt” storm.
UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.1
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm
----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 04 OCT 2024 Time : 004020 UTC
Lat : 21:09:35 N Lon : 47:09:00 W
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.0 / 919.2mb/140.0kt
Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.0 6.9 6.9
Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 22 km
Center Temp : +20.1C Cloud Region Temp : -72.1C
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.1
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm
----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 04 OCT 2024 Time : 004020 UTC
Lat : 21:09:35 N Lon : 47:09:00 W
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.0 / 919.2mb/140.0kt
Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.0 6.9 6.9
Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 22 km
Center Temp : +20.1C Cloud Region Temp : -72.1C
2 likes
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Can you confirm that because if it’s true they’re disregarding SFMR for the rest of the season…that’s insane. And possibly the worst decision they’ve ever made. Why toss out an entire set of measurements? Sure they’re not perfect, but that isn’t an excuse to disregard them.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Planes from the 1970s? Degraded equipment? Radar holes? Could it be insufficient allocation of funds? No, no, conspiracy is afoot.
1 likes
- Stormybajan
- Category 1
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 3:21 pm
- Location: Windward Islands
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Major Hurricane Kirk is a thing of absolute beauty right now , with Lesli behind it also poised to become another strong October MDR cane, this will definitely be another record for longest duration in a season for the first MDR Major and the last one, (From June 28th- till whenever Leslie stops being a major IF it gets there :p ) . Looks like that 934 mb record has so far as the deepest storm will be broken at 5 am given ATCF says Kirk is now 145 mph and 935mb! Very much Lorenzo-like! Possibly a 50+ ACE October incoming??


4 likes
Sad West Indies and Manchester United fan ⚽️
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3344
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Counterpoint: Hurricane Beryl was assessed real-time to be Category 5, and they upgraded accordingly.
Does anyone know what the satellite data was at when NHC operationally upgraded 2019's Lorenzo to Cat 5?
2 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Counterpoint: Hurricane Beryl was assessed real-time to be Category 5, and they upgraded accordingly.
Does anyone know what the satellite data was at when NHC operationally upgraded 2019's Lorenzo to Cat 5?
Beryl had recon, these systems don’t. And they’re going below satellite estimates for no justified reason. It’s baffling
2 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
aspen wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Can you confirm that because if it’s true they’re disregarding SFMR for the rest of the season…that’s insane. And possibly the worst decision they’ve ever made. Why toss out an entire set of measurements? Sure they’re not perfect, but that isn’t an excuse to disregard them.
Yes wxman57 posted their statement on the talking tropics forum. They’ve determined that the equipment they use for sfmr measurements has degraded to the point of being unreliable. I assume replacement and calibration takes more time than they expect to have between flights during hurricane season, so they aren’t planning to do so before the end of the season.
2 likes
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
aspen wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Can you confirm that because if it’s true they’re disregarding SFMR for the rest of the season…that’s insane. And possibly the worst decision they’ve ever made. Why toss out an entire set of measurements? Sure they’re not perfect, but that isn’t an excuse to disregard them.
Comes from wxman57 over in the gulf AOI thread:
wxman57 wrote:Thought y'all might find this interesting. No more SFMR data this year. It was deemed too unreliable.
https://wxman57.com/images/SFMR.JPG
https://wxman57.com/images/SFMR.JPG
It seems to be because of a lack of data integrity rather than some systematic error in the wind speed algorithm, but that's just my speculation based on what NOAA said.
1 likes
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
cheezyWXguy wrote:aspen wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Can you confirm that because if it’s true they’re disregarding SFMR for the rest of the season…that’s insane. And possibly the worst decision they’ve ever made. Why toss out an entire set of measurements? Sure they’re not perfect, but that isn’t an excuse to disregard them.
Yes wxman57 posted their statement on the talking tropics forum. They’ve determined that the equipment they use for sfmr measurements has degraded to the point of being unreliable. I assume replacement and calibration takes more time than they expect to have between flights during hurricane season, so they aren’t planning to do so before the end of the season.
Hmm. Hopefully they fix what they can in the off-season.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3344
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Counterpoint: Hurricane Beryl was assessed real-time to be Category 5, and they upgraded accordingly.
Does anyone know what the satellite data was at when NHC operationally upgraded 2019's Lorenzo to Cat 5?
Just went back and checked for myself... NHC did upgrade when Dvorak hit 7.0 that night in 2019. Not upgrading Kirk to Category 5 would be a bit inconsistent with previous rationale.
5 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Counterpoint: Hurricane Beryl was assessed real-time to be Category 5, and they upgraded accordingly.
Does anyone know what the satellite data was at when NHC operationally upgraded 2019's Lorenzo to Cat 5?
ADT was at CI# 7.0, raw T#7.3 just prior to upgrade:
https://x.com/CC_StormWatch/status/1178125334979514368
There was also a special manual estimate at T7.0:
TXNT26 KNES 290144
TCSNTL
A. 13L (LORENZO)
B. 29/0130Z
C. 24.0N
D. 44.8W
E. ONE/GOES-E
F. T7.0/7.0
G. IR/EIR
H. REMARKS...SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION FOR NHC. WMG EYE IS EMBEDDED IN
AND SURROUNDED BY W RESULTING IN A DT OF 7.0 AFTER 1.0 IS ADDED FOR AN
EYE ADJUSTMENT. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...TURK
TCSNTL
A. 13L (LORENZO)
B. 29/0130Z
C. 24.0N
D. 44.8W
E. ONE/GOES-E
F. T7.0/7.0
G. IR/EIR
H. REMARKS...SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION FOR NHC. WMG EYE IS EMBEDDED IN
AND SURROUNDED BY W RESULTING IN A DT OF 7.0 AFTER 1.0 IS ADDED FOR AN
EYE ADJUSTMENT. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
NIL
...TURK
This was the dvorak satellite appearance at the time:

2 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
aspen wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Counterpoint: Hurricane Beryl was assessed real-time to be Category 5, and they upgraded accordingly.
Does anyone know what the satellite data was at when NHC operationally upgraded 2019's Lorenzo to Cat 5?
Beryl had recon, these systems don’t. And they’re going below satellite estimates for no justified reason. It’s baffling
I agree there seems to be a hesitancy to upgrade storms that don’t have recon during peak intensity, or at all, but this isn’t a new thing. Sam 21, Eta 20, Jose 17, Igor 10 are the storms I can think of off the bat that either didn’t have recon at peak intensity, or at all. I’m sure there are others, and each one has their cult following. I’d call myself a member of some of them.
1 likes
- sasha_B
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 59
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
- Location: Charleston, SC
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
cheezyWXguy wrote:PDKlikatino wrote:Between Kirk, Leslie, Gilma, and plenty of other storms this season, it seems like NHC is not on top of things in terms of measuring the intensity. I'm fairly certain that it was mentioned that the NHC isn't going to use SFMR measurements for the remainder of the season but surely there's something going on. Does anyone have any theories as to what might be the case, because I'm stumped.
Planes from the 1970s? Degraded equipment? Radar holes? Could it be insufficient allocation of funds? No, no, conspiracy is afoot.
I mean, I don't think anyone's trying to imply conspiracy. But it does seem to be the case that the NHC has been unusually conservative about making certain calls on several occasions in both the Atlantic and the Pacific this season. More transparency with regard to why they treat certain intensity estimates from (for example, or from recon) as suspect/inadequate evidence would perhaps clarify things for those who are confused or doubtful. They're experts & surely have their reasons for making these decisions - but considering the (apparent) discrepencies between their standards this year compared to years past I don't think it's all that 'conspiratorial' to wonder whether there mightn't have been some changes to policy in addition to issues with equipment, funding, &c - it's a subject that's been raised quite a few times by various commentators here and elsewhere over the past few months.
4 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
Yeah, this is a Cat 5
4 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: KIRK - Hurricane - Discussion
With a T6.5 fix and rather transient peak, it will be very tough to get an upgrade. Only data point supporting 140kt is ADT for now. I'm sure recon would find 140kt winds, but the NHC does not issue intensities on vibes.
1 likes
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests