NATL: HUMBERTO - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9781
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#141 Postby Sciencerocks » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:15 am

Cat3 very soon. Probably within the next 3-4 hours or might even be one right now!!! Officially I am saying.
Cat4 by 11pm est tonight

24-36 hours this will probably be 125-130 knts.
4 likes   

User avatar
Woofde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:33 am

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#142 Postby Woofde » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:25 am

WaveBreaking wrote:Once again this season I wake up to an ERI-ing hurricane that’s 2 categories higher than anyone thought it would be at this time.

Image
When SSTs are on fire, these things are bound to rapidly intensify. There's ample fuel.Image
2 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3524
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#143 Postby Teban54 » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:25 am

Hmm. Convective bursts to the east obscuring the eye?

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#144 Postby Travorum » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:28 am

Teban54 wrote:Hmm. Convective bursts to the east obscuring the eye?

https://i.postimg.cc/PJfwHLXZ/goes19-ir-08-L-202509261355.gif


Seems to be the case.

Image
1 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20118
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#145 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:41 am

aspen wrote:
zzzh wrote:No recon, not even a meso sector for Humberto. I guess random clouds over SE/SW US are more important than a major hurricane? :lol:

The lack of attention Humberto — and 94L, to a lesser extent — are getting is so odd. No posted recon plans for Humberto nor meso sectors for either yet. At least we had a low-level and an upper-level flight, but I’d expect much more recon activity than what we’re seeing.


Why? 94L is more important at the moment as it threatens landfall. These are exciting systems but recon doesn't run just to satisfy our curiosity. They will be VERY busy over the next few days, I would delay as long as possible.
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#146 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:42 am

What does faster-than-expected strengthening imply for the forecast track?
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

Ian2401
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:55 pm
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#147 Postby Ian2401 » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:48 am

tolakram wrote:
aspen wrote:
zzzh wrote:No recon, not even a meso sector for Humberto. I guess random clouds over SE/SW US are more important than a major hurricane? :lol:

The lack of attention Humberto — and 94L, to a lesser extent — are getting is so odd. No posted recon plans for Humberto nor meso sectors for either yet. At least we had a low-level and an upper-level flight, but I’d expect much more recon activity than what we’re seeing.


Why? 94L is more important at the moment as it threatens landfall. These are exciting systems but recon doesn't run just to satisfy our curiosity. They will be VERY busy over the next few days, I would delay as long as possible.

I imagine there are budgetary concerns as well. Recon is not cheap and as you said they will be flying 94L very soon. Really no reason to fly a storm that will recurve out to sea, especially with a storm that will be threatening mainland U.S. at the same time. They were able to get upper level data ahead of the two systems which is awesome for injecting into the models.
1 likes   
B.S. Meteorology from Florida State '24 // Current M.S. Meteorology student at Florida State

Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling

Consult the NHC for official information

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#148 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:59 am

Ian2401 wrote:no reason to fly a storm that will recurve out to sea


My house is firmly within the cone.
6 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 147751
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#149 Postby cycloneye » Fri Sep 26, 2025 12:30 pm

Ok folks, there will be recon starting on monday. :clap: :Partytime:

https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 6#p3139136
6 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8918
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#150 Postby aspen » Fri Sep 26, 2025 12:53 pm

cycloneye wrote:Ok folks, there will be recon starting on monday. :clap: :Partytime:

https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 6#p3139136

Rip, a 3 day wait and probably after peak intensity.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

ChrisH-UK
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 8:22 am

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#151 Postby ChrisH-UK » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:01 pm

CIMSS Tropical Intensity product has Humberto at 92 knots, near cat 3 I think it won't be long before it get called.

https://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/ ... ry_IR.html

Image
3 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#152 Postby Travorum » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:11 pm

I think the 18z subjective dvorak fix is going to be like an hour before dvorak appearance significantly improves. Happened a few times with Gabrielle.
3 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34127
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#153 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:27 pm

I wonder if a special Dvorak fix will be in and we might see a special advisory?

I'd go with 105 kt for the current intensity. It looks like a solid T5.5+ to me, and the constraints are meant to be broken.
7 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#154 Postby Travorum » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:39 pm

DT of 5.5 but they didn't break constraints.

A. 08L (HUMBERTO)

B. 26/1800Z

C. 22.2N

D. 57.8W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T5.0/5.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...OW EYE SURROUNDED BY B BUT EMBEDDED IN LG YIELDS A DT OF
5.5 AFTER ADDING 0.5 FOR THE EYE ADJUSTMENT. THE MET AND PT ARE 5.0 BASED
ON A RAPID DEVELOPMENT TREND OVER THE PAST 24 HOURS. THE FT IS BASED ON
CONSTRAINTS LIMITING THE CHANGE IN T-NUMBER TO 1.0 OVER SIX HOURS. THE
SIX HOUR AVERAGE DT OF 4.8 DOES NOT JUSTIFY BREAKING CONSTRAINTS.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...COVERDALE
0 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#155 Postby Travorum » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:41 pm

18z best track is 95kts, 966mb

AL, 08, 2025092618, , BEST, 0, 223N, 578W, 95, 966, HU
1 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#156 Postby sasha_B » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:43 pm

...the decision not to break constraints being directly followed by ADT adjusted T# jumping to a very impressive 5.9. Probably that instantaneous T# is a bit exaggerated but it looks like Humberto might continue to go underestimated until later this evening.
4 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8918
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#157 Postby aspen » Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:44 pm

Travorum wrote:18z best track is 95kts, 966mb

AL, 08, 2025092618, , BEST, 0, 223N, 578W, 95, 966, HU

Last advisory was 5 kt above the 12z BT so I think the NHC will upgrade Humberto to a major at 5pm.
5 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#158 Postby sasha_B » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:08 pm

The eye is clearing out again in the last few LWIR frames. If it can stay clear this time, the NHC should have ADT CI# >=5.5 by 21z, which would justify 100 kts when blended with the current 5.0 subjective estimate. Satcon estimates for Humberto are already at or above 96 knots & <965 hPa with a rising intensity trend.
1 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#159 Postby Travorum » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:09 pm

Raw T# hit 6.0 and the CI# hit 5.5, if it keeps climbing a blend of estimates could justify 105kts at 5pm at this rate (even though it's probably there now already).

UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.1
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 26 SEP 2025 Time : 184019 UTC
Lat : 22:23:13 N Lon : 57:59:29 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
5.5 / 958.0mb/102.0kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
5.5 5.9 6.0

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR :N/A km

Center Temp : +2.0C Cloud Region Temp : -65.6C
1 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2687
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#160 Postby USTropics » Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:51 pm

tolakram wrote:
aspen wrote:
zzzh wrote:No recon, not even a meso sector for Humberto. I guess random clouds over SE/SW US are more important than a major hurricane? :lol:

The lack of attention Humberto — and 94L, to a lesser extent — are getting is so odd. No posted recon plans for Humberto nor meso sectors for either yet. At least we had a low-level and an upper-level flight, but I’d expect much more recon activity than what we’re seeing.


Why? 94L is more important at the moment as it threatens landfall. These are exciting systems but recon doesn't run just to satisfy our curiosity. They will be VERY busy over the next few days, I would delay as long as possible.


Can confirm this is exactly what NHC is doing. There is an untasked recon flight for Humberto later this evening (per my sources). They will be flying into Humberto as the system approaches Bermuda, but for now 94L remains somewhat more of a mystery (how does it interact with the ULL over the Southeast, how does shear and dry air subsidence dump from Humberto impact development, etc.). A lot of uncertainty in the models, which is why we need moar data.
8 likes   


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests