GCANE wrote:I think I said this before and sorry if I am a little out of line.
This close in high-altitude recon has minimal benefit at this point.
They need to send planes into the GoM.
Can you explain the GOM situation?
Moderator: S2k Moderators

GCANE wrote:I think I said this before and sorry if I am a little out of line.
This close in high-altitude recon has minimal benefit at this point.
They need to send planes into the GoM.
Weathertracker96 wrote:g easGCANE wrote:I think I said this before and sorry if I am a little out of line.
This close in high-altitude recon has minimal benefit at this point.
They need to send planes into the GoM.
Can you explain the GOM situation?


GCANE wrote:Weathertracker96 wrote:g easGCANE wrote:I think I said this before and sorry if I am a little out of line.
This close in high-altitude recon has minimal benefit at this point.
They need to send planes into the GoM.
Can you explain the GOM situation?
A low-level vort has formed at the tail end of the trof, just north of the Yucatan.
This is moving east toward TD9.
It will interact with TD9 and govern in large part its track.
Motion will primarily driven by the Fujiwhara effect where the two will try and circle counterclockwise around each other.
You wont see a big spin rather a shift in the track of TD9 based on where the two are located.
Timing of the two is everything and how strong they are is also key.


Weathertracker96 wrote:GCANE wrote:Weathertracker96 wrote:g eas
Can you explain the GOM situation?
A low-level vort has formed at the tail end of the trof, just north of the Yucatan.
This is moving east toward TD9.
It will interact with TD9 and govern in large part its track.
Motion will primarily driven by the Fujiwhara effect where the two will try and circle counterclockwise around each other.
You wont see a big spin rather a shift in the track of TD9 based on where the two are located.
Timing of the two is everything and how strong they are is also key.
Thank you so much for explaining. Another layer to an already interesting dynamic. Thanks for your analysis

Blown Away wrote:How does the NHC advertise NW at 5-6 mph all day and it’s been stuck at 76.5 since this morning.







Hurricanes: Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Katrina 2005 - Wilma 2005 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024
skillz305 wrote:Has it technically been stalling today in its current location right under our noses? I’m completely mind boggled.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests