Unless a dramatic and perhaps historical flurry of activity occurs in the next 9 weeks, 2007 will rank as a historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as a whole. During the past 30 years, only 1977, 1981, and 1983 have had less activity to date (January-TODAY, Accumulated Cyclone Energy). However, the year is not over...
http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/
Interesting stuff....
Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- DanKellFla
- Category 5
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:02 pm
- Location: Lake Worth, Florida
- TreasureIslandFLGal
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1581
- Age: 57
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
- Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!
Re: Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
Looks like we've earned an insurance REDUCTION in Florida after this year! How much does anyone want to be that WON'T happen? *sigh
0 likes
Re: Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
1981 had many storms form in the Atlantic, but they were often short lived. EPAC and WPAC were about average in 1981. 1983 was below average for ATL and WPAC due to coming off of a warm phase of a strong El Nino, strongest prior to 1997. EPAC was hyperactive in 1983, one of the most on record. As for 1977, all the basins saw below average number of storms due to combination of coming off of El Nino and entering it again later that year, above average pressure, and monsoons.
0 likes
- hurricanetrack
- HurricaneTrack.com
- Posts: 1781
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
Re: Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
Well, at least now there is scientific evidence to prove that the season did not live up to expectations. Those expectations were from NOAA, CSU, Accuweather and TSR- among others. The season has failed to meet those expectations, or forecasts, or predictions and the data proves it once and for all.
Noel not withstanding, this will be one of the least active two year periods in a long, long time. Of course, this could all go to the toilet if somehow a plethora of strong hurricanes comes out of no where within the next 30+ days...
Noel not withstanding, this will be one of the least active two year periods in a long, long time. Of course, this could all go to the toilet if somehow a plethora of strong hurricanes comes out of no where within the next 30+ days...
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
hurricanetrack wrote:Of course, this could all go to the toilet if somehow a plethora of strong hurricanes comes out of no where within the next 30+ days...
Stranger things have happened at sea. I think it's rather unlikely though.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
Wasn't the last time a year was almost universally below average, like, 1977?
0 likes
Re: Historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as
Squarethecircle wrote:Wasn't the last time a year was almost universally below average, like, 1977?
Yep.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: kevin and 17 guests