Hurricane Isidore...

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#21 Postby HurricaneBill » Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:26 pm

Scorpion wrote:Geez, how was Isidore only a 3? He looks like a 5 easily. Almost Camille-esque. He had a perfectly small, clear eye, deep convection, perfect CDO, perfect outflow. Did they underestimate his intensity?


The sustained winds were 125 mph, but the pressure was 934 mb. I think the pressure plunged, but the winds didn't have time to catch up.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#22 Postby Stormsfury » Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:53 pm

Hurricanehink wrote:I just can't believe it actually went south. That was a pretty big surprise that night.


Interestingly enough, the GFDL nailed the southward movement into the Yucatan ...
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#23 Postby Stormsfury » Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:00 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:Well, I would think that would not happen since it really strengthened as it made landfall. Nevertheless, In my opinion, Hurricane Isidore would have been a category 4/5 hurricane in Grand Isle, LA.


Three reasons, hypothetically on why Isidore's winds didn't reflect such a deep pressure ...

1) Environmental pressures were fairly low around the cyclone.
2) Very large cloud canopy envelope and circulation ... takes a larger cyclone much longer for the pressure/wind relation to correlate vs. a smaller cyclone such as Charley ...
3) Interference from land disrupting the circulation inflow ...

Derek Ortt wrote:Also, just because conditions are favorable for a TS, doesnt make them favorable for a hurricane. I have done a lot of research and it will be published hopefully within a year indicating that a major hurricane requires much mroe favorable conditions to intensify then does a TS. Isidore likely would have been a cat 1 or a 2 at landfall as slow as it was moving


After Tropical Storm Isidore finally left the Yucatan Peninsula, the inner core of the cyclone had completely collapsed and never could regain any sustainable convective activity around the low ... and more resembled a subtropical cyclone (in regards to expansive wind field) ....

SF
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#24 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:20 pm

even if it hadnt broken apart, i likely would have had problems as shear increased just before landfall and there was some very dry air that moved near the storm. we likely would have had an ivan where the storm collapsed in the final 3 hours before hitting the coast
0 likes   

Anonymous

#25 Postby Anonymous » Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:32 pm

Yes. But Ivan was a weak 4 that weakened into a weak 3. Isidore would have been a strong 4/5 weakened to a strong 3/4.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#26 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:30 am

ivan was a 5 that weakened to a weak 3. It was stronger tha isidore likely would have been at a similar latitude.

The GOM has a hard time supporting a large cat 5 due to the lack of the oceanic heat content. That is why the storms that did really explode in the GOM, like Charley were smaller storms where SST played the rolem, not heat content
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#27 Postby HurricaneBill » Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:29 am

Derek Ortt wrote:ivan was a 5 that weakened to a weak 3. It was stronger tha isidore likely would have been at a similar latitude.

The GOM has a hard time supporting a large cat 5 due to the lack of the oceanic heat content. That is why the storms that did really explode in the GOM, like Charley were smaller storms where SST played the rolem, not heat content


So a larger storm would have a difficult time because it'd use up the heat content, while a smaller storm means less heat content gets used up.

Am I getting this right?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#28 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:15 pm

that would likely be the case because the larger storm ahs a larger wind field, which stirs up the water more
0 likes   

Anonymous

#29 Postby Anonymous » Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:19 pm

Well Derek, if not Isidore, than one place got lucky this year. FLORIDA. NOT FROM CHARLEY HITTING TAMPA, or IVAN IN NEW ORLEANS....IT WAS FRANCES! Frances was forecast to hit the populated east coast of Florida at 145 mph. FRANCES WAS THE COSTLIEST HURRICANE. MR. SHEAR and MR. DRY AIR saved Florida though. I MEAN, THAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#30 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:39 pm

Frances still came in with 110 m.p.h. winds according to the preliminary best track and it moved so slow.

Not sure if the damage would have exceeded 20 billion or not, since Jeanne came in as a strong 3 (areas that were spared by Frances were devastated by Jeanne). So while ZFlorida got lucky from Frances, C fla didnt from Jeanne
0 likes   

Anonymous

#31 Postby Anonymous » Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:53 pm

Big difference between 120-125 and 145-150 mph.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#32 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:24 pm

also, frances re-intensified into a 95KT hurricane, after weakening to 85KT at landfall.

Frances just as easily could have weakened to a cat 1 before landfall, but it got its act together quite a bit over the gulfstream and almost regained major hurricane status as it made landfall
0 likes   

Anonymous

#33 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:40 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:also, frances re-intensified into a 95KT hurricane, after weakening to 85KT at landfall.

Frances just as easily could have weakened to a cat 1 before landfall, but it got its act together quite a bit over the gulfstream and almost regained major hurricane status as it made landfall


Had it stayed 145 mph...Instead of Geraldo on Juno Beach in 40 mph winds...it would have been 140 mph.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#34 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:54 am

the point is, NOBODY is saying that C fla was lucky and to say that it was lucky is 100% irresponsible.

I sure wouldnt go to C fla, see the destruction, and say how lucky they were.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 338 guests