vbhoutex wrote:IWS2K5 wrote:vbhoutex wrote:IWS2K5 wrote:Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:IWS2K5 wrote:You shouldn't assume his theory wouldn't have any effect. He is a scientist at MIT, I think he knows what he is talking about.
Is that what is allowed at MIT these days. How sad
What are your credentials to say his plan won't do anything to the hurricane.
What are yours?
I didn't say if it would or wouldn't work.
I am not the one claiming I know more then researchers and experts in the field like most people here are.
I don't see anyone claiming they know more than researchers or scientists. I see some questioning what IMHO is a somewhat bizzare and unsubstantiated claim at this point, as we well should. As much as I advocate and bellieve in "thinking outside the box" Don Sutherland hit it on the head with his post. Ain't gonna happen, and what part of DON'T FOOL WITH MOTHER NATUREdo these people not understand?
Many Many prominant scientist who have studied weather and atmospheric sciences say it is possible to manipulate the weather, by saying they are wrong is saying you know more than them. I am sorry but you like him are just as bad as people who say there is no global warming.



