chris remnants thread #8
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
kenl01 wrote:Plus with only marginal conditions for redevelopment, the chances are pretty slim for this system to redevelop into anything potent anytime soon. Overall the shear is expected to remain unfavoravble for the next several days....
What do you think the conditions were when Chris fisrt started out as a TD? I say it has a decent chance and that is the LLC
0 likes
cheezyWXguy wrote:kenl01 wrote:Plus with only marginal conditions for redevelopment, the chances are pretty slim for this system to redevelop into anything potent anytime soon. Overall the shear is expected to remain unfavoravble for the next several days....
What do you think the conditions were when Chris fisrt started out as a TD? I say it has a decent chance and that is the LLC
The conditions were somewhat favorable during the time (little shear for about 24 to 36hrs) when it developed. Immediately thereafter though, an ULL dropped south into the cyclone, causing rapid weakening due to increased shear of course. Even though conditions are not as hostile at the moment, the relative shear should inhibit any significant redevelopment for now. Also AccuWx recently stated "While the system will continue over warm waters, strong upper-level winds make it unlikely that Chris will return to his former glory anytime soon."
There maybe some chance of redevelopment in the west GOM before landfall, but by then there won't be sufficient time for significant redevelopment to commence since it will be too close to land already.
Last edited by kenl01 on Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
rnbaida wrote:That what i am seeing. Shear is high and it is extrememly disorganized to develop into anything major...
It's disorganized...but where are you getting your info that shear is high?
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8shr.html
It's sitting under a ridge...and low shear....and good upper level divergence...
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dvg.html
Are you looking at data..or just shooting from the hip?
Last edited by Air Force Met on Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
Stormavoider wrote:OK, I'll LEAP. There is a LLC just off Havana that will meet anyone's definition.
No, not really . . .
The little tiny circulation you're seeing is definately there, but it's storm-relative as opposed to the ground-relative. Clouds on the southern side of it are still moving west at a pretty good clip, indicating it still has a long ways to go.
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
Air Force Met wrote:rnbaida wrote:That what i am seeing. Shear is high and it is extrememly disorganized to develop into anything major...
It's disorganized...but where are you getting your info that shear is high?
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8shr.html
It's sitting under a ridge...and low shear....and good upper level divergence...
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dvg.html
Are you looking at data..are just shooting from the hip?
Thanks for the sanity injection!
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
WindRunner wrote:Stormavoider wrote:OK, I'll LEAP. There is a LLC just off Havana that will meet anyone's definition.
No, not really . . .
The little tiny circulation you're seeing is definately there, but it's storm-relative as opposed to the ground-relative. Clouds on the southern side of it are still moving west at a pretty good clip, indicating it still has a long ways to go.
And actually...if you compare it with an IR...it appears to be in the mid-levels...not the low levels. It shows up well on IR and if it was a LLC...it wouldn't.
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
WindRunner wrote:Stormavoider wrote:OK, I'll LEAP. There is a LLC just off Havana that will meet anyone's definition.
No, not really . . .
The little tiny circulation you're seeing is definately there, but it's storm-relative as opposed to the ground-relative. Clouds on the southern side of it are still moving west at a pretty good clip, indicating it still has a long ways to go.
I disagree. If you look at the loop prior to the center being obscured, you can clearly see eastward movement.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Stormavoider wrote:
Thanks for the sanity injection!
No problem. The strong winds are actually ahead of the wave. That is giving it some speed divergence....hence the divergence area on the chart.
The winds are 15 knots at 300mb where the wave is now.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_003l.gif
That hardly qualifies as HIGH shear...especially when the wave is moving at about 10 knots...so...5 knots of east wind on top of it.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 11430
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
- Contact:
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Stratosphere747 wrote:You have to remember that just because you see a circulation, it may not be at the lower levels.
Yep..if vis is available...you always have to match it up with IR...and that goes for anything...even in the winter time.
Always compare the two...using IR to find the temp of the cloud so you know what level it is. In this instance...the clouds are below freezing...so it is mid-upper levels....which is typical in the tropics when you get a deep burst of convection. It spins up a vort center in the mid and upper levels. That vort center, if it can keep some convection is critical in working with the tropical wave to form a sfc low.
https://txspace.tamu.edu/bitstream/1969 ... Sippel.pdf
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:YHaL ... lr=lang_en
0 likes
Stormavoider wrote:Air Force Met wrote:
And actually...if you compare it with an IR...it appears to be in the mid-levels...not the low levels. It shows up well on IR and if it was a LLC...it wouldn't.
If it is mid level would it be so persistent in holding it's position?
I can tell by just looking at visible imagery it's a MLC. When you see more gray and whispy looking clouds than white and thicker clouds, those are usually cirrus clouds which are usually farther above the surface.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Stormavoider wrote:Air Force Met wrote:
And actually...if you compare it with an IR...it appears to be in the mid-levels...not the low levels. It shows up well on IR and if it was a LLC...it wouldn't.
If it is mid level would it be so persistent in holding it's position?
The flow in the mid levels isn't that strong right now.
But it is mid-level. Look at an IR shot and check out the temps on it:
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc0 ... atest.html
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
Air Force Met wrote:Stratosphere747 wrote:You have to remember that just because you see a circulation, it may not be at the lower levels.
Yep..if vis is available...you always have to match it up with IR...and that goes for anything...even in the winter time.
Always compare the two...using IR to find the temp of the cloud so you know what level it is. In this instance...the clouds are below freezing...so it is mid-upper levels....which is typical in the tropics when you get a deep burst of convection. It spins up a vort center in the mid and upper levels. That vort center, if it can keep some convection is critical in working with the tropical wave to form a sfc low.
https://txspace.tamu.edu/bitstream/1969 ... Sippel.pdf
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:YHaL ... lr=lang_en
Standby: I'm looking for my Ouiji board to dial-up Einstein to decipher this for me.
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.