96L Invest,E of Windwards,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #1
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Like I said,"Jam, is a TROLL!"
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
HurricaneMaster_PR wrote:Jam151 wrote:Well i don't want to talk bad about the NHC but this is just too much. I beg all of you to look at this disterbence and then look at the one in the epac, you will see the difference.
Ok..you are comparing a strong tropical storm to a tropical wave... Obviously the tropical storm will look really much better than the wave.
The NHC states that the wave is better organize because of what WindRunner said. It has developed a LLC which can be clearly seen in latest visible loop.
000
ABPZ20 KNHC 111648
TWOEP
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
ISSUED BY THE HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER CAMP SPRINGS MD
10 AM PDT TUE JUL 11 2006
FOR THE EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC...EAST OF 140 DEGREES WEST LONGITUDE..
THE HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER IS ISSUING ADVISORIES ON
TROPICAL STORM BUD...LOCATED ABOUT 645 MILES SOUTH-SOUTHWEST OF THE
SOUTHERN TIP OF THE BAJA CALIFORNIA PENINSULA.
A BROAD AREA OF LOW PRESSURE IS CENTERED ABOUT 250 MILES
SOUTH-SOUTHWEST OF ACAPULCO MEXICO. SATELLITE PICTURES INDICATE
THAT THIS SYSTEM CONTINUES TO SHOW SIGNS OF ORGANIZATION AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS APPEAR FAVORABLE FOR A TROPICAL DEPRESSION
TO FORM IN THE NEXT DAY OR TWO AS IT MOVES WEST-NORTHWESTWARD.
ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL STORM FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED THROUGH
WEDNESDAY.
Just wanted to clarify the east pac Disbence. And yall are right about one thing i won't mention this mass of clouds again, i'm done with it. I don't know what yall are seeing but i can't see so i guess we will just see what happens.








Last edited by Jam151 on Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg
Small burst of convection on SAT. I think this thing is not gone yet.
Small burst of convection on SAT. I think this thing is not gone yet.

0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
My ultimate wish for this year's board is that the eye-rolling emoticon be banished...It is obnoxious, arrogant, and impolite...as are the people who use it....If I could figure out a way of automatically ignoring all posts that contain the eyeroll, I think I'd waste a lot less time wading through these threads. 

0 likes
- NONAME
- Category 1
- Posts: 373
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:15 am
- Location: Where the Wind Blows
[quote="Jam151"]Stewart must have lost his freaking mind. Their is nothing there, how can we take them seriously when the peak actually gets here when stewart does stuff like this. INSANE!
[/quo
If you look at the visible it shows the the low level sturcture has gotten better organized therefore it has gotten more organize.






If you look at the visible it shows the the low level sturcture has gotten better organized therefore it has gotten more organize.
0 likes
drezee wrote:My opinion is a bit different than most on this system. I find it hard to believe that this system will not develop. The low level structure has improved remarkable since yesterday at this time...in spite of the lack of convection. If we can get any I mean any sustained convection this will become a Classified Tropical Cyclone. Unlike 93L which had very small LLCs with little influence, this system has a average envelope. The upper ridge is starting to catch up with it...if only for a time. If it is going to go at all...It should blow its top tonight.
I see that the NHC agrees with my point of it becoming better organized today...
THIS SYSTEM HAS
BECOME A LITTLE BETTER ORGANIZED THIS AFTERNOON...BUT ANY FURTHER
DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE SLOW TO OCCUR DUE TO UNFAVORABLE UPPER-LEVEL
WINDS.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Hey I use the roll emoticon, along with some of the other Mets, mods, and admins, on this board.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
302
WHXX01 KWBC 112050
CHGHUR
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO TPC/NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONES.
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL962006) ON 20060711 1800 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
060711 1800 060712 0600 060712 1800 060713 0600
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 12.5N 53.0W 13.1N 54.9W 13.6N 56.8W 14.1N 58.5W
BAMM 12.5N 53.0W 13.3N 55.6W 14.1N 58.1W 14.8N 60.6W
A98E 12.5N 53.0W 13.0N 56.2W 13.6N 59.1W 14.3N 61.6W
LBAR 12.5N 53.0W 13.0N 55.8W 13.8N 58.8W 14.5N 61.7W
SHIP 25KTS 24KTS 23KTS 23KTS
DSHP 25KTS 24KTS 23KTS 23KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
060713 1800 060714 1800 060715 1800 060716 1800
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 14.6N 60.4W 16.2N 64.2W 17.8N 67.5W 18.4N 71.2W
BAMM 15.5N 63.2W 17.3N 68.6W 18.7N 73.8W 19.1N 78.8W
A98E 15.0N 63.8W 16.9N 67.7W 18.6N 71.6W 19.3N 76.1W
LBAR 15.5N 64.7W 17.8N 70.1W 20.7N 74.9W .0N .0W
SHIP 22KTS 22KTS 26KTS 33KTS
DSHP 22KTS 22KTS 26KTS 34KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 12.5N LONCUR = 53.0W DIRCUR = 280DEG SPDCUR = 16KT
LATM12 = 11.9N LONM12 = 49.8W DIRM12 = 282DEG SPDM12 = 15KT
LATM24 = 11.2N LONM24 = 46.9W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 60NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1011MB OUTPRS = 1014MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
WHXX01 KWBC 112050
CHGHUR
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO TPC/NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONES.
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL962006) ON 20060711 1800 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
060711 1800 060712 0600 060712 1800 060713 0600
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 12.5N 53.0W 13.1N 54.9W 13.6N 56.8W 14.1N 58.5W
BAMM 12.5N 53.0W 13.3N 55.6W 14.1N 58.1W 14.8N 60.6W
A98E 12.5N 53.0W 13.0N 56.2W 13.6N 59.1W 14.3N 61.6W
LBAR 12.5N 53.0W 13.0N 55.8W 13.8N 58.8W 14.5N 61.7W
SHIP 25KTS 24KTS 23KTS 23KTS
DSHP 25KTS 24KTS 23KTS 23KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
060713 1800 060714 1800 060715 1800 060716 1800
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 14.6N 60.4W 16.2N 64.2W 17.8N 67.5W 18.4N 71.2W
BAMM 15.5N 63.2W 17.3N 68.6W 18.7N 73.8W 19.1N 78.8W
A98E 15.0N 63.8W 16.9N 67.7W 18.6N 71.6W 19.3N 76.1W
LBAR 15.5N 64.7W 17.8N 70.1W 20.7N 74.9W .0N .0W
SHIP 22KTS 22KTS 26KTS 33KTS
DSHP 22KTS 22KTS 26KTS 34KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 12.5N LONCUR = 53.0W DIRCUR = 280DEG SPDCUR = 16KT
LATM12 = 11.9N LONM12 = 49.8W DIRM12 = 282DEG SPDM12 = 15KT
LATM24 = 11.2N LONM24 = 46.9W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 60NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1011MB OUTPRS = 1014MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
0 likes
Maybe I should clarify my statement...the POSTS that contain the eyeroll are obnoxious, arrogant and impolite...the Posters might just be having a bad day...but I do not think it is EVER polite to roll your eyes at someone...it's just bad manners...of course, I'm also showing bad manners by pointing out the bad manners of others...Good manners requires that I just shut up and ignore the eye rolls 

0 likes
skysummit wrote:Thunder44 wrote:cheezywxman wrote:yup...it has outflow, possibly another devloping MLL??
By the way, I don't this think has a chance to develop. It's just thunderstorms associated with the ITCZ and will probably run into South America or dissapate before even getting there.
Are you looking at the right area? There's no way it can run into South America. It's already well north of that latitude.
I was talking about the area further to the SE of the wave.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
If this had an LLC a little while back then this would have been TD #2 already.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Well, I certainly do not think this is "gone" like some people think, remember most on here are not saying this is going to develop right now in its current location..We are watching this to see of it can hold its structure for when it gets in the western Caribbean area where it has a better shot, and right now it is holding its own...
0 likes
Michael
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Probably and I'm actually suprised that this got an LLC so quickly.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: GCANE and 41 guests