

Moderator: S2k Moderators
HouTXmetro wrote::grr: What A DUD , this season was hyped up to be so active and here we are midway through July and there is absolutely NADA even to discuss............. Just kidding, but seriously, do you all think the the forecasters will downgrade their storm numbers in light of this slow start? How do similar analog seasons compare as far a slow start and threats to CONUS?
Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:In the end total numbers don't really matter, it is where the storms go and how strong they are when them get there that makes all the difference. Need I even mention hurricane seasons 1991 and 1992. Each season only featured one hurricane force storm at landfall, one was named Bob the other Andrew.
wxman57 wrote:HouTXmetro wrote::grr: What A DUD , this season was hyped up to be so active and here we are midway through July and there is absolutely NADA even to discuss............. Just kidding, but seriously, do you all think the the forecasters will downgrade their storm numbers in light of this slow start? How do similar analog seasons compare as far a slow start and threats to CONUS?
We just raised our forecast by 1 based on the greater certainty of no El Nino. 15-9-4 looks about right. About 4-5 in August, 5-6 in September and 2-3 in October.
gigabite wrote:The first new moon of July was over Saudi Arabia, the second new moon of July the new moon will be just south of Baja, the August full moon will be over the Philippines, the September New Moon will be in the Atlantic, but south of the equator, and in October forget about it's way to far south where ever it is.
August is the season maybe the early part of September. I am thinking short hot summer and long cold winter. 6-7 storms maybe a couple more for improved technology, 2 US landfalls, analog 1952, 1977
Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, Google Adsense [Bot], Sciencerocks, Steve H., USTropics, Zonacane and 71 guests