New Vortex Msg - Pressure Back Up a Tad

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22983
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

New Vortex Msg - Pressure Back Up a Tad

#1 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:11 pm

It's at 28.1N / 71.5W now. Pressure 957mb, up 1mb from earlier. Max FL winds 109kts - about 98 kts. Strong Cat 2.

URNT12 KNHC 162347
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 16/2347Z
B. 28 DEG 08 MIN N
71 DEG 28 MIN W
C. 700 MB 2696 M
D. NA
E. NA
F. 144 DEG 100 KT
G. 042 DEG 053 NM
H. 957 MB
I. 9 C/ 3106 M
J. 16 C/ 3106 M
K. 13 C/ NA
L. CLOSED WALL
M. E09/25/18
N. 12345/7
O. 0.1/1 NM
P. AF963 1713A ISABEL OB 31
MAX FL WIND 109 KT E QUAD 2303Z. MAX TEMP 18C AND LOWEST EXTRAP SLP 950MB 220/11NM FROM FL CENTER.
0 likes   

Rainband

#2 Postby Rainband » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:12 pm

Hopefully it keeps going up for the sake of those in her path :o
0 likes   

mike01205
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

#3 Postby mike01205 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:12 pm

wxman57 but that is The East Quadrant.

The NE quadrant must be stronger than that doesn't it?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22983
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#4 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:25 pm

mike01205 wrote:wxman57 but that is The East Quadrant.

The NE quadrant must be stronger than that doesn't it?


Strongest winds are in the eastern half of the storm NE-E-SE. But lowest pressure is in the center. I don't doubt there are stronger winds in a few places in that eastern half. It's a big storm.
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#5 Postby JetMaxx » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:28 pm

I saw a report of 111 kts in the NE eyewall..equating to 100 kts at the surface....IMHO Miles Lawrence should have at least raised the intensity from 90 to 95 kts at 00z.....I would have, and bet money Stacy Stewart would have too.
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#6 Postby JetMaxx » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:33 pm

Recon reported a pressure of 950 mb/ 28.05" 11 n mi sw of where they fixed the center...which makes me wonder if the 957 mb report was the true center of the eye....or did they miss the center, and the 950 mb pressure reading the true central pressure...

I guess we'll know in a few hours....on the next penetration of the eyewall.
0 likes   

mike01205
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

#7 Postby mike01205 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:39 pm

Perry I thought the same thing why a pressure of 950mb?
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#8 Postby Stormsfury » Tue Sep 16, 2003 7:54 pm

Well I'm at a lost here myself ...

I think I can eliminate two possible scenarios.

1) Isabel isn't THAT improperly stacked, IMO, from westerly shear.
2) Isabel doesn't have the mesovorticities that it once did when it was annular.

Otherwise, I honestly am not sure.

SF
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#9 Postby JetMaxx » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:01 pm

Also note the warmest temp at flight level (18°c) was ALSO at the location of the lowest pressure (950 mb) -- yet they claim it wasn't the true center?

That's B.S. guys....everyone knows the lowest pressure AND warmest temps are located at the center of the eye.
I think the recon missed the center, and Miles Lawrence was too friggin clueless to pick up on it.

If I were the NHC forecaster, this hurricane would be initialized at 100 kts and 950 mb....based on both the lowest pressure and warmest eye temp at that same location. If that point isn't the center of the eye -- it soon will be..
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#10 Postby Stormsfury » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:09 pm

JetMaxx wrote:Also note the warmest temp at flight level (18°c) was ALSO at the location of the lowest pressure (950 mb) -- yet they claim it wasn't the true center?

That's B.S. guys....everyone knows the lowest pressure AND warmest temps are located at the center of the eye.
I think the recon missed the center, and Miles Lawrence was too friggin clueless to pick up on it.

If I were the NHC forecaster, this hurricane would be initialized at 100 kts and 950 mb....based on both the lowest pressure and warmest eye temp at that same location. If that point isn't the center of the eye -- it soon will be..


Hmmm.... that would also sure throw out the northerly movement as well, wouldn't it? Hopefully the next RECON fix will clue us in ... this left us with many mysteries.

SF
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#11 Postby soonertwister » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:09 pm

If the 950 mb reading correct, that's a drop of what - 8 mb? And in what kind of time frame?

Still a chance of rapid deepening?
0 likes   

mike01205
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

#12 Postby mike01205 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:09 pm

GREAT POINT PERRY.

I totally agree with you, that must be the center
0 likes   

mike01205
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

#13 Postby mike01205 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:10 pm

sooner look at radar either IR or vis it clearly shows it is strengtening
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#14 Postby soonertwister » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:20 pm

Just checked. Assuming extrap is correct, that's a 9 mb drop in 6 hours. If that is the beginning of a strengthening cycle, then a drop to 917 mb in another 18 hours would classify as rapid deepening, or a drop to 929 in 6 more hours would qualify as explosive.

Keep an eye on that. If in 6 hours the pressure is below 940, big trouble could be ahead.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#15 Postby Stormsfury » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:29 pm

soonertwister wrote:Just checked. Assuming extrap is correct, that's a 9 mb drop in 6 hours. If that is the beginning of a strengthening cycle, then a drop to 917 mb in another 18 hours would classify as rapid deepening, or a drop to 929 in 6 more hours would qualify as explosive.

Keep an eye on that. If in 6 hours the pressure is below 940, big trouble could be ahead.


Well we definitely need another recon fix before we can jump to that conclusion right now...

SF
0 likes   

rick-g
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Wilkes-Barre PA

#16 Postby rick-g » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:36 pm

Did any one else comment on how big the storm has become in the last few days? it went from hurricane winds from 45 to 60 miles to 160 miles (from the center).

Rick G
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#17 Postby soonertwister » Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:48 pm

According to the forecast/advisory, hurricane force winds don't extend out that far, but it is very possible that hurricane force will sweep a swath considerably more than 100 miles wide at landfall.

Pretty serious stuff. Andrew was nowhere near that big.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Canelaw99, Cpv17, cycloneye, LarryWx, Stratton23, Ulf and 63 guests