06 Z tropical models....brace yourself

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
PurdueWx80
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2720
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

06 Z tropical models....brace yourself

#1 Postby PurdueWx80 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:44 am

Almost no change from 00Z or 18Z:

Image
0 likes   

dennis1x1

#2 Postby dennis1x1 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:45 am

yep..still 2 distinct schools of thought.....someones going gray or just pulling it all out right now.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#3 Postby MWatkins » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:47 am

That's probably because the 0Z GFS looks just like the 18Z version...which is already 30 nautical miles too far north with the track.

Note to GFS...this hurricane is not a nor-easter.

Good God...how long can we go before someone...somewhere...in a position to make a forecast...realizes that this system has been trending south of the guidance since it CAME OFF AFRICA?

I really need to go to bed.

MW
Last edited by MWatkins on Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

PurdueWx80
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2720
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

#4 Postby PurdueWx80 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:48 am

yeah, the NHC is taking the track of least regret...or something like that. At least it still appears to be the average of the two schools of thought. GOES is back up...a little early...and she is still maintaining that WNW track...also looks much better organized w/ one eyewall apparent.
0 likes   

PurdueWx80
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2720
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

#5 Postby PurdueWx80 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:51 am

MWatkins wrote:That's probably because the 0Z GFS looks just like the 18Z version...which is already 30 nautical miles too far north with the track.

Note to GFS...this hurricane is not a nor-easter.

Good God...how long can we go before someone...somewhere...in a position to make a forecast...realizes that this system has been trending south of the guidance since it CAME OFF AFRICA?

I really need to go to bed.

MW


too far south of the track???
0 likes   

KeyLargoDave
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:03 pm
Location: 25 05' 80 26'
Contact:

#6 Postby KeyLargoDave » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:51 am

Mike, thanks for all you're doing, hope you're sleeping now...
0 likes   

dennis1x1

#7 Postby dennis1x1 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:52 am

sat eclipse over......northerly component substantial....lingering issues with NW quadrant of "perfect" storm....coldest tops of frances thus far.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
Last edited by dennis1x1 on Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#8 Postby mobilebay » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:54 am

MWatkins wrote:That's probably because the 0Z GFS looks just like the 18Z version...which is already 30 nautical miles too far north with the track.

Note to GFS...this hurricane is not a nor-easter.

Good God...how long can we go before someone...somewhere...in a position to make a forecast...realizes that this system has been trending south of the guidance since it CAME OFF AFRICA?

I really need to go to bed.

MW

Hey Mike. That 0Z GFS did not even initialize that high pressure ssytem that the NHC said is there.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#9 Postby LAwxrgal » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:55 am

Oh, no, that's not the UKMet is it? Why is it so far left?

:eek:
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

JayPSU
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 7:12 pm

#10 Postby JayPSU » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:57 am

dennis1x1 wrote:sat eclipse over......northerly component substantial....lingering issues with NW quadrant of "perfect" storm....coldest tops of frances thus far.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html


Holy crap!! Look at those bigtime thunderstorms wrap around! :eek:
0 likes   

PurdueWx80
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2720
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

#11 Postby PurdueWx80 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:59 am

mobile - I wonder if these dropsondes have been calibrated correctly. Instruments often have errors w/ them that are substantially high. I would assume that since they are putting so much trust in them, they have been calibrated and have been found to be accurate. Also, the first model simulations don't depend that strongly on new observations...that's why having the obs alone can help someone now-cast. This caveat may explain the reason for the GFS' incorrect initialization.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#12 Postby MWatkins » Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:00 am

PurdueWx80 wrote:
MWatkins wrote:That's probably because the 0Z GFS looks just like the 18Z version...which is already 30 nautical miles too far north with the track.

Note to GFS...this hurricane is not a nor-easter.

Good God...how long can we go before someone...somewhere...in a position to make a forecast...realizes that this system has been trending south of the guidance since it CAME OFF AFRICA?

I really need to go to bed.

MW


too far south of the track???


I edited the post to make it north of track right after I posted. It's getting late.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

logybogy

#13 Postby logybogy » Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:01 am

sat eclipse over......northerly component substantial....lingering issues with NW quadrant of "perfect" storm.


The storm has gone just north of west. That last sat after the eclipse is a bit misleading because the eye appears to have contracted quite a bit.
0 likes   

PurdueWx80
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2720
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

#14 Postby PurdueWx80 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:02 am

dennis1x1 wrote:sat eclipse over......northerly component substantial....lingering issues with NW quadrant of "perfect" storm....coldest tops of frances thus far.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html


If you draw a straight line between the NHC's projected positions and follow the actual satellite eye (you can see both on the NHC's loops)...the eye is a bit south of where it "should be". That's not to say it won't shift slightly northward to fit their forecast. There has been no significant shift to the north though. Frances is still pretty much on a WNW tracking.
0 likes   

dennis1x1

#15 Postby dennis1x1 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:03 am

im going center to center, contraction is irrelevant....solid 300 degrees from pre-post eclipse.
0 likes   

dennis1x1

#16 Postby dennis1x1 » Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:10 am

looking closer....i see a 300 from 3:30 to 6z back to a 280 from 6 to 7z

also a contracting eye during the eclipse and an expanding eye since.

analysis from here:

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc-bin/tc_ho ... 98L.INVEST,
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cajungal, hurricanes1234, Teban54 and 64 guests