NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
zzzh
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1018
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:13 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1781 Postby zzzh » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:45 pm

150kt FL in NE
0 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3455
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1782 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:46 pm

Going into the night time, storm may strengthen more. Many of you seem disappointed in the storm "stalling." The pressure is at 910 mb. Some crazy cold tops. The amount of lightning around the center for this long is more than I think I've seen. This is still an incredible storm and deserves its flowers.

I'm thinking it ramps up again in a few hours. Possibly start expanding the wind field just before landfall.
5 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1783 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:47 pm

zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE

This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.

Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.
4 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1784 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:56 pm

AF pass: 156 kt FL in the SW quad, and 909.6 mb extrap. Seems to be intensifying again compared to the first pass (if only slightly), pending dropsonade.

Edit: NOAA pass was at almost the same time (and the same angle). 152 kt FL in the NE quad, 910.2 mb extrap. Hasn't reached peak winds to the SW yet.
Last edited by Teban54 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

zzzh
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1018
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:13 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1785 Postby zzzh » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:56 pm

FL 156 in the SW. Really weird
2 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1786 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:56 pm

910.2mb extrap on NOAA, 909.6mb extrap on AF. 156kt FL winds on the AF plane and for what its worth 164kt SFMR, both in the SW quad.
2 likes   

User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1787 Postby WaveBreaking » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:56 pm

158kt FL
909.6mbar extrap MSLP @ 16kt
2 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5420
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1788 Postby Nimbus » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:57 pm

Teban54 wrote:
zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE

This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.

Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.


Is tropical tidbits getting overloaded, I got a few gateway errors and no update?
Oh there it is 909.6
Last edited by Nimbus on Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1466
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1789 Postby Jr0d » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:57 pm

ooks like AF may have missed the eye also, we will see with the next batch of data. My guess is the turbulence is so bad they are having trouble holding a straight course. edit...i was mistaken

When I went sleep to around noon, I did not expect to wake up to Melissa still having a perfect eye and expected an EWRC, or even some dry air intrusion. Its rare for a storm to be able maintain this kind of intensity and this effectively perfect structure for so long.
Last edited by Jr0d on Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9011
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1790 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:57 pm

Holding steady around 910 it seems. SW eyewall is ludicrous.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9011
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1791 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:58 pm

Nimbus wrote:
Teban54 wrote:
zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE

This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.

Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.


Is tropical tidbits getting overloaded, I got a few gateway errors and no update?

I’ve been getting a ton too. I think it is from everyone checking in on recon lol. Pressing the refresh button solves it every time.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1792 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:59 pm

164 knots on SFMR... incredible.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10144
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1793 Postby Sciencerocks » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:00 pm

Image
7 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1466
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1794 Postby Jr0d » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:01 pm

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:164 knots on SFMR... incredible.


SFMR is not reliable, especially with winds this high. Its good data if used properly but it tends to overestimate wind speed.
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1795 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:01 pm

Question: Why did they schedule the recon in a way that have two planes penetrate the eye at almost the same time and the same angle?
1 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1796 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:03 pm

Jr0d wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:164 knots on SFMR... incredible.


SFMR is not reliable, especially with winds this high. Its good data if used properly but it tends to overestimate wind speed.


Clearly it must have some degree of accuracy, because the NHC is using 175mph.

CDO is cooling, down to -79.5C..
Last edited by Hypercane_Kyle on Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2242
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1797 Postby Kazmit » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:03 pm


The CDO looks like it’s expanding, to the west especially.
1 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Ian2401
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:55 pm
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1798 Postby Ian2401 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:05 pm

Teban54 wrote:Question: Why did they schedule the recon in a way that have two planes penetrate the eye at almost the same time and the same angle?


If I had to guess it is another layer of confidence in their wind speed and pressure measurements if both planes show similar readings.
3 likes   
B.S. Meteorology from Florida State '24 // Current M.S. Meteorology student at Florida State

Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling

Consult the NHC for official information

sikkar
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:44 am
Location: Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1799 Postby sikkar » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:06 pm

Ocean heat content working its magic.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1381
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1800 Postby NotoSans » Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:06 pm

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
Jr0d wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:164 knots on SFMR... incredible.


SFMR is not reliable, especially with winds this high. Its good data if used properly but it tends to overestimate wind speed.


Clearly it must have some degree of accuracy, because the NHC is using 175mph.

CDO is cooling, down to -79.5C..


The NHC took into account dropsonde winds but not SFMR.

The aircraft measured maximum 700-mb flight-level
winds of 161 kt, which supports surface winds of near 145 kt. In
addition, low-level winds measured by a dropwindsonde in the
northeastern eyewall support surface winds of 155 kt. During the
time since the aircraft departed the hurricane, there has been
little change in organization and no obvious signs that Melissa has
weakened. Thus, the initial intensity is set at 150 kt as a blend
of the surface wind estimates mentioned above.
7 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beef Stew, dukeblue219, Kazmit, TheHurricaneGod and 131 guests