NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- TeamPlayersBlue
- Category 5

- Posts: 3458
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
- Location: Denver/Applewood, CO
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Going into the night time, storm may strengthen more. Many of you seem disappointed in the storm "stalling." The pressure is at 910 mb. Some crazy cold tops. The amount of lightning around the center for this long is more than I think I've seen. This is still an incredible storm and deserves its flowers.
I'm thinking it ramps up again in a few hours. Possibly start expanding the wind field just before landfall.
I'm thinking it ramps up again in a few hours. Possibly start expanding the wind field just before landfall.
5 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE
This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.
Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.
4 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
AF pass: 156 kt FL in the SW quad, and 909.6 mb extrap. Seems to be intensifying again compared to the first pass (if only slightly), pending dropsonade.
Edit: NOAA pass was at almost the same time (and the same angle). 152 kt FL in the NE quad, 910.2 mb extrap. Hasn't reached peak winds to the SW yet.
Edit: NOAA pass was at almost the same time (and the same angle). 152 kt FL in the NE quad, 910.2 mb extrap. Hasn't reached peak winds to the SW yet.
Last edited by Teban54 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
910.2mb extrap on NOAA, 909.6mb extrap on AF. 156kt FL winds on the AF plane and for what its worth 164kt SFMR, both in the SW quad.
2 likes
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
158kt FL
909.6mbar extrap MSLP @ 16kt
909.6mbar extrap MSLP @ 16kt
2 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE
This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.
Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.
Is tropical tidbits getting overloaded, I got a few gateway errors and no update?
Oh there it is 909.6
Last edited by Nimbus on Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
When I went sleep to around noon, I did not expect to wake up to Melissa still having a perfect eye and expected an EWRC, or even some dry air intrusion. Its rare for a storm to be able maintain this kind of intensity and this effectively perfect structure for so long.
Last edited by Jr0d on Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Holding steady around 910 it seems. SW eyewall is ludicrous.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:Teban54 wrote:zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE
This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.
Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.
Is tropical tidbits getting overloaded, I got a few gateway errors and no update?
I’ve been getting a ton too. I think it is from everyone checking in on recon lol. Pressing the refresh button solves it every time.
1 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5

- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
164 knots on SFMR... incredible.
1 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
-
Sciencerocks
- Category 5

- Posts: 10173
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:164 knots on SFMR... incredible.
SFMR is not reliable, especially with winds this high. Its good data if used properly but it tends to overestimate wind speed.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Question: Why did they schedule the recon in a way that have two planes penetrate the eye at almost the same time and the same angle?
1 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5

- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Jr0d wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:164 knots on SFMR... incredible.
SFMR is not reliable, especially with winds this high. Its good data if used properly but it tends to overestimate wind speed.
Clearly it must have some degree of accuracy, because the NHC is using 175mph.
CDO is cooling, down to -79.5C..
Last edited by Hypercane_Kyle on Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Sciencerocks wrote:https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8479/7RGx5Y.gif
The CDO looks like it’s expanding, to the west especially.
1 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
Ian2401
- Category 1

- Posts: 321
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:55 pm
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:Question: Why did they schedule the recon in a way that have two planes penetrate the eye at almost the same time and the same angle?
If I had to guess it is another layer of confidence in their wind speed and pressure measurements if both planes show similar readings.
3 likes
B.S. Meteorology from Florida State '24 // Current M.S. Meteorology student at Florida State
Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling
Consult the NHC for official information
Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling
Consult the NHC for official information
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ocean heat content working its magic.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Jr0d wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:164 knots on SFMR... incredible.
SFMR is not reliable, especially with winds this high. Its good data if used properly but it tends to overestimate wind speed.
Clearly it must have some degree of accuracy, because the NHC is using 175mph.
CDO is cooling, down to -79.5C..
The NHC took into account dropsonde winds but not SFMR.
The aircraft measured maximum 700-mb flight-level
winds of 161 kt, which supports surface winds of near 145 kt. In
addition, low-level winds measured by a dropwindsonde in the
northeastern eyewall support surface winds of 155 kt. During the
time since the aircraft departed the hurricane, there has been
little change in organization and no obvious signs that Melissa has
weakened. Thus, the initial intensity is set at 150 kt as a blend
of the surface wind estimates mentioned above.
7 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 139 guests









