NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
The top 10 most intense storms now:
1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905
1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905
9 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
150kts/903mb at 11pm, Melissa is #9 of all time by intensity
2 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:The top 10 most intense storms now:
1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905
We're at the point where, if the current trend continues, every recon pass can shake off one or a few more storms from the list.
7 likes
- Category5Kaiju
- Category 5

- Posts: 4259
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
There's a very real possibility that Melissa's minimum core pressure will be lower than Mitch's and Dean's; the significant of this is that future Atlantic hurricanes would need to have a core pressure of LESS THAN 905 MBAR to even crack the top 10 most intense in history.
And, assuming we continue to get storms like Dorian, Milton, or Melissa in future seasons, then I do believe there will come a point when the top 10 most intense Atlantic hurricane list will solely consist of sub-900 members.
Edit: confirmed.
And, assuming we continue to get storms like Dorian, Milton, or Melissa in future seasons, then I do believe there will come a point when the top 10 most intense Atlantic hurricane list will solely consist of sub-900 members.
Edit: confirmed.
Last edited by Category5Kaiju on Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Odd eyewall drop. Winds drop from 140 kt to 122 kt right above the surface, then pick up to 160+ kt by the 919mb level.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- zal0phus
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 200
- Age: 24
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:32 am
- Location: St. Louis
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Another top-ten hurricane. What a terrible yet astounding two years it's been
4 likes
Do not take anything I say seriously as a form of meteorological prediction. I am not a meteorologist; I don't think being in law school translates to any special knowledge. I am just a somewhat bullish amateur watcher.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
NHC no longer forecasts any weakening before landfall, and has 150 kt for the next forecast point. (I believe that the "inland" and "over water" were labeled on the wrong lines.)
FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS
INIT 28/0300Z 16.6N 78.5W 150 KT 175 MPH
12H 28/1200Z 17.5N 78.3W 150 KT 175 MPH
24H 29/0000Z 18.8N 77.4W 120 KT 140 MPH
36H 29/1200Z 20.7N 76.0W 90 KT 105 MPH...INLAND
48H 30/0000Z 23.0N 74.3W 85 KT 100 MPH...OVER WATER
60H 30/1200Z 25.8N 72.0W 80 KT 90 MPH
72H 31/0000Z 29.8N 68.2W 75 KT 85 MPH
96H 01/0000Z 38.9N 56.5W 60 KT 70 MPH
120H 02/0000Z 47.5N 40.0W 50 KT 60 MPH...POST-TROP/EXTRATROP
$$
Forecaster Pasch
INIT 28/0300Z 16.6N 78.5W 150 KT 175 MPH
12H 28/1200Z 17.5N 78.3W 150 KT 175 MPH
24H 29/0000Z 18.8N 77.4W 120 KT 140 MPH
36H 29/1200Z 20.7N 76.0W 90 KT 105 MPH...INLAND
48H 30/0000Z 23.0N 74.3W 85 KT 100 MPH...OVER WATER
60H 30/1200Z 25.8N 72.0W 80 KT 90 MPH
72H 31/0000Z 29.8N 68.2W 75 KT 85 MPH
96H 01/0000Z 38.9N 56.5W 60 KT 70 MPH
120H 02/0000Z 47.5N 40.0W 50 KT 60 MPH...POST-TROP/EXTRATROP
$$
Forecaster Pasch
5 likes
- xtyphooncyclonex
- Category 5

- Posts: 3880
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
- Location: Cebu City
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:The top 10 most intense storms now:
1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing
6 likes
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
This also makes Melissa the strongest TC of 2025 to date.
6 likes
-
IsabelaWeather
- Category 1

- Posts: 316
- Age: 36
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:29 am
- Location: Isabela, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Category5Kaiju wrote:There's a very real possibility that Melissa's minimum core pressure will be lower than Mitch's and Dean's; the significant of this is that future Atlantic hurricanes would need to have a core pressure of LESS THAN 905 MBAR to even crack the top 10 most intense in history.
And, assuming we continue to get storms like Dorian, Milton, or Melissa in future seasons, then I do believe there will come a point when the top 10 most intense Atlantic hurricane list will solely consist of sub-900 members.
Edit: confirmed.
Well, i mean, given enough time that is inevitable. 1780 was likely sub 900 but we werent able to measure until recently.
6 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34286
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
aspen wrote:Odd eyewall drop. Winds drop from 140 kt to 122 kt right above the surface, then pick up to 160+ kt by the 919mb level.
Also over 190 kt a few hundred feet above the surface. If that can penetrate down...
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:NHC no longer forecasts any weakening before landfall, and has 150 kt for the next forecast point. (I believe that the "inland" and "over water" were labeled on the wrong lines.)FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS
INIT 28/0300Z 16.6N 78.5W 150 KT 175 MPH
12H 28/1200Z 17.5N 78.3W 150 KT 175 MPH
24H 29/0000Z 18.8N 77.4W 120 KT 140 MPH
36H 29/1200Z 20.7N 76.0W 90 KT 105 MPH...INLAND
48H 30/0000Z 23.0N 74.3W 85 KT 100 MPH...OVER WATER
60H 30/1200Z 25.8N 72.0W 80 KT 90 MPH
72H 31/0000Z 29.8N 68.2W 75 KT 85 MPH
96H 01/0000Z 38.9N 56.5W 60 KT 70 MPH
120H 02/0000Z 47.5N 40.0W 50 KT 60 MPH...POST-TROP/EXTRATROP
$$
Forecaster Pasch
It is labelled correctly, its just that the "inland" is over Cuba. The 12H position is S of Jamaica and the 24H position is N of Jamaica.
Last edited by Travorum on Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
- zal0phus
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 200
- Age: 24
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:32 am
- Location: St. Louis
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Is Melissa going to just clip Jamaica on the edge now? Curious how the NHC doesn't denote "inland" until Cuba. Still atrocious for Jamaica of course, but is there any hope of a non-direct hit?
0 likes
Do not take anything I say seriously as a form of meteorological prediction. I am not a meteorologist; I don't think being in law school translates to any special knowledge. I am just a somewhat bullish amateur watcher.
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5

- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:The top 10 most intense storms now:
1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing
I told ya'll a couple of days ago I was moving the "I" curse to "M"

1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
1 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:The top 10 most intense storms now:
1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing
Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.
5 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6227
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
My god, I step away for like an hour and a half and come back to see the best Haiyan impression I’ve ever seen an Atlantic hurricane do. Melissa may “only” be the 9th most intense, but this has to be the most elite looking hurricane I’ve ever seen in this basin. Even the likes of Wilma, Gilbert, and Milton didn’t stand this tall imo.
11 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
zal0phus wrote:Is Melissa going to just clip Jamaica on the edge now? Curious how the NHC doesn't denote "inland" until Cuba. Still atrocious for Jamaica of course, but is there any hope of a non-direct hit?
The forecast mentions positions at the forecast time. There isn’t a forecast point on Jamaica, so it won’t say “inland” there. That doesn’t change the fact that the cone goes right over the island.
2 likes
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5

- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Almost at page 100
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests









