NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5436
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2761 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:30 pm

ljmac75 wrote:
Nimbus wrote:
ljmac75 wrote:Where are you getting these obs for Montego bay?


Weather Underground link updates every few minutes I've seen wind speeds as high as 75 knots in squalls.

https://www.wunderground.com/weather/jm/montego-bay

Looks like it's just model output, nearest station hasn't reported since very early this morning.


So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.

The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1454
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2762 Postby Ubuntwo » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:31 pm

Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.
8 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10252
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2763 Postby Blown Away » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:38 pm

Ubuntwo wrote:Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.


Josh M was literally on the E edge of that eyewall. I was hoping he would see the stadium since he documents these storms so amazingly well.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1454
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2764 Postby Ubuntwo » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:39 pm

Nimbus wrote:So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.

The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.

They have a history section for the airport station and the most recent observation is from 5 AM, despite regularly updating "current conditions":
Image

NWS also has direct obs from the airport & the most recent one is from 5 AM as well.
https://forecast.weather.gov/data/obhistory/MKJS.html

I would agree that Wunderground appears to be displaying model outputs. Though I would be surprised if Montego Bay saw conditions exceeding category 2 due to the rapid deterioration we observed.
0 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5436
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2765 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:43 pm

Ubuntwo wrote:Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.


Southern shore of west Jamaica is a disaster area now, he must have been caught up helping with search and rescue. Maybe upload some video tonight?
0 likes   

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2766 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:47 pm

Is that an eye coming out? If the mid-level core survived the mountains and drills down the surface we could be off to the races again.
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1454
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2767 Postby Ubuntwo » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:50 pm

Nimbus wrote:
Ubuntwo wrote:Based on an analysis of recon data (TDR/HDOBs) and Cuban radar, I estimate that Josh's location in Crawford did see a brief pause in precip, but with gusty mesovortex winds to hurricane force. The location may have had glimpses of the stadium effect at times. His pressure observation won't be directly representative of the landfall intensity - at his distance from the eye, pressures could have been as high as 910mb w/ a 892mb landfall. The gradient was extremely sharp! Pressures above this could suggest some weakening prior to landfall, and pressures 900mb and below would at the very least confirm an 892mb landfall intensity & imply that it may have been stronger. Let's hope he had a barometer set up further west.


Southern shore of west Jamaica is a disaster area now, he must have been caught up helping with search and rescue. Maybe upload some video tonight?

I hope he's alright. The entire parish is without internet/electricity, so he will need to wait on access to Starlink or the like before any uploads. I would concur disaster response is probably his priority at the moment. Crawford saw the RMW for over an hour.

Blown Away wrote:Josh M was literally on the E edge of that eyewall. I was hoping he would see the stadium since he documents these storms so amazingly well.

Crawford was balanced on the razor's edge. +- .5 miles would have made the difference. Parallax, inward slope of the eye, and mesovortex timing makes it really tough to say whether he saw the stadium or not.
1 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2768 Postby Hurrilurker » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:52 pm

Jamaica's terrain really put the clamps on it more than I expected for a relatively short pass, but it looks like it's recovering quickly offshore. Wouldn't be surprised to see it get back down to the 940s.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5436
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2769 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:52 pm

Ubuntwo wrote:
Nimbus wrote:So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.

The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.

They have a history section for the airport station and the most recent observation is from 5 AM, despite regularly updating "current conditions":
https://i.imgur.com/BSPiIyS.png

NWS also has direct obs from the airport & the most recent one is from 5 AM as well.
https://forecast.weather.gov/data/obhistory/MKJS.html

I would agree that Wunderground appears to be displaying model outputs. Though I would be surprised if Montego Bay saw conditions exceeding category 2 due to the rapid deterioration we observed.


Its not model output changing every couple minutes.
Would have to be an elaborate hoax on the part of Weather Underground.
Just changed again and I'm thinking the airport just stopped updating their web page and left their wind speed observations connected to Weather Underground?

Image
Last edited by Nimbus on Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2770 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:53 pm

Nimbus wrote:
Ubuntwo wrote:
Nimbus wrote:So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.

The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.

They have a history section for the airport station and the most recent observation is from 5 AM, despite regularly updating "current conditions":
https://i.imgur.com/BSPiIyS.png

NWS also has direct obs from the airport & the most recent one is from 5 AM as well.
https://forecast.weather.gov/data/obhistory/MKJS.html

I would agree that Wunderground appears to be displaying model outputs. Though I would be surprised if Montego Bay saw conditions exceeding category 2 due to the rapid deterioration we observed.


Its not model output changing every couple minutes.
Would have to be an elaborate hoax on the part of Weather Underground.
Just changed again and I'm thinking the airport just stopped updating their we page and left their wind speed observations connected to Weather Underground.

https://imgur.com/4YHFT8T


Those huge weather aggregators fake their outputs all the time. Fake radars based on satellite imagery, etc. So much garbage from those sites. If you can’t see the original data, don’t trust it.
3 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1908
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2771 Postby Hurricane2022 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:58 pm

3 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2126
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2772 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:15 pm

Looks like she is off to the races again. Fortunately she doesnt have much time to really intensify.
3 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1908
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2773 Postby Hurricane2022 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:24 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:Looks like she is off to the races again. Fortunately she doesnt have much time to really intensify.

:double:
Image
6 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 248
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2774 Postby sasha_B » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:24 pm

Melissa's eye does seem to be warming up pretty quickly now, despite the serious deterioration that's been evident from satellite and recon observations.
3 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2249
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2775 Postby Kazmit » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:27 pm

Looks like the time over land worked as a sort of pseudo EWRC that has given it a much larger eye.
4 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2776 Postby dukeblue219 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:28 pm

Image

Quite the eye popping out tonight.
7 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2126
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2777 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:03 pm

Ok, Melissa is not done yet by any means. I fear she is rapidly intensifying once more.
1 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

Nuno
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:35 am
Location: Coral Gables, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2778 Postby Nuno » Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:05 pm

Melissa after landfall looking like a "mature" cyclone. The october big eyed storms. Much larger eyewall.
4 likes   
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34267
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2779 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:07 pm

It also seems to be moving more northeast - that would give it a bit more time over water.
8 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5436
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2780 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:24 pm

Nuno wrote:Melissa after landfall looking like a "mature" cyclone. The october big eyed storms. Much larger eyewall.


Agreed these have large wind and precipitation fields and so damage is more widespread.
Larger eye hopefully won't go below 940 again NHC still kept her at cat 3 for destructive potential.
Cuba needs to get their final preps done.
At least she is moving faster now so the precip totals will only have hours not days.
0 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ethaninfinity, Steve and 131 guests