NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11872
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#621 Postby GCANE » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:10 pm

3 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6195
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#622 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:12 pm

I’m not sold on the contraction to pinhole eye though, that eye looks about average sized. Good news is that probably means a Milton or Wilma-level explosion isn’t as likely, but bad news is a larger core won’t collapse as quickly into an ewrc upon reaching peak. Could still undergo one, but would probably stabilize for a while first. Won’t matter much either way though, it’s hard to bet against a cat5 peak at this point so Jamaica better be taking this seriously
3 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11872
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#623 Postby GCANE » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:15 pm

Not going to see an eye for a while.
Cirrus spewing from the hot towers will obscure it.
Probably a high-end Cat 1 within the hour.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148049
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#624 Postby cycloneye » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:16 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:I’m not sold on the contraction to pinhole eye though, that eye looks about average sized. Good news is that probably means a Milton or Wilma-level explosion isn’t as likely, but bad news is a larger core won’t collapse as quickly into an ewrc upon reaching peak. Could still undergo one, but would probably stabilize for a while first. Won’t matter much either way though, it’s hard to bet against a cat5 peak at this point so Jamaica better be taking this seriously


The worse part is that it will move very slow to prolong the effects for 48 hours or more on the island.
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2487
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#625 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:22 pm

Radar is showing a west movement
https://zoom.earth/places/jamaica/#map=radar
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

MHC Tracking
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:05 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#626 Postby MHC Tracking » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:27 pm

GCANE wrote:Usually when a strong RI occurs a EWRC quickly ensues right after.
Wonder if one will be underway before Jamaica.
Praying that it does.

An EWRC would likely exacerbate the situation by broadening the radius of hurricane-force winds and in turn increasing surge
1 likes   

MHC Tracking
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:05 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#627 Postby MHC Tracking » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:29 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:I’m not sold on the contraction to pinhole eye though, that eye looks about average sized. Good news is that probably means a Milton or Wilma-level explosion isn’t as likely, but bad news is a larger core won’t collapse as quickly into an ewrc upon reaching peak. Could still undergo one, but would probably stabilize for a while first. Won’t matter much either way though, it’s hard to bet against a cat5 peak at this point so Jamaica better be taking this seriously

I'm not "downcasting" but I remain a bit doubtful of a Cat 5 peak. Downsloping from Jamaica has interfered with the development of hurricanes in the past (see: Grace 2021), it feels possible that it does so here as well.
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2537
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#628 Postby BobHarlem » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:34 pm

Jamaica radar loop
Image
2 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9333
Age: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#629 Postby Iceresistance » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:37 pm

GCANE wrote:Tower is tightening up the eyewall
Likely a pinhole in 24 hrs.

https://metservice.gov.jm/daily-forecast/radar/

Can you post the radar image for me? I can't see it for some reason
2 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#630 Postby Beef Stew » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:43 pm

There it is. We officially have Hurricane Melissa.
3 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 832
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#631 Postby HurricaneRyan » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:51 pm

Here we go :(
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5402
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#632 Postby Nimbus » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:51 pm

ScottNAtlanta wrote:Radar is showing a west movement
https://zoom.earth/places/jamaica/#map=radar


NHC is blending the ECM track a little, the 2 PM NHC update still reporting a WNW motion.
Could be a wobble or start of a new 6 hour motion, the sooner the west turn comes the better for Kingston.
Current forecast would put Kingston in the core winds for about 24 hours starting around Monday noon.
Mostly focusing on the flooding potential which is a much larger area.
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2692
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#633 Postby USTropics » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:52 pm

MHC Tracking wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:I’m not sold on the contraction to pinhole eye though, that eye looks about average sized. Good news is that probably means a Milton or Wilma-level explosion isn’t as likely, but bad news is a larger core won’t collapse as quickly into an ewrc upon reaching peak. Could still undergo one, but would probably stabilize for a while first. Won’t matter much either way though, it’s hard to bet against a cat5 peak at this point so Jamaica better be taking this seriously

I'm not "downcasting" but I remain a bit doubtful of a Cat 5 peak. Downsloping from Jamaica has interfered with the development of hurricanes in the past (see: Grace 2021), it feels possible that it does so here as well.


We we will need six things to achieve maximum potential intensity (MPI) here (a real possibility), I'll list it from very likely -> unknown:

1) High OHC (obvious we have this)
2) Wind shear to decrease to > 10kt (very likely)
3) Subsidence/dry air entrainment to be minimal (very likely)
4) Efficient outflow to rapidly advect updrafted air away (likely)
5) A pinhole eye to sustain RI to cat 5 (unknown, only mesoscale models can parameterize this)
6) Like you stated, it needs to stay far enough south of Jamaica to not have inflow disrupted (uncertain)

The NHC is following the consensus models (particularly HCCA) and hedging towards the Google DeepMind/EAIFS ensemble tracks currently (they've done shockingly well this year). Looking at mesoscale models that are following this track currently, HAFS-A again has the most accurate run at 12z:
Image

HAFS-B has its peak at the same time, but more to the north in location:
Image

HMON is similar to HAFS-B
Image

I'm not buying the HWRF, as it's track is far too quick (landfall already tomorrow evening in Jamaica):
Image

Again, I think the HAFS-A has done really well with the structural changes and speed of Melissa, and is supported by the best performing consensus model and the AI ensemble suite. I think RI is almost certain imo and Cat 4/5 is a real possibility depending on that initial structure (i.e., no EWRC and ability for radial winds to refine a pinhole eye structure).
Image
9 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1772
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#634 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:05 pm

1 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8958
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#635 Postby aspen » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:28 pm

USTropics wrote:
MHC Tracking wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:I’m not sold on the contraction to pinhole eye though, that eye looks about average sized. Good news is that probably means a Milton or Wilma-level explosion isn’t as likely, but bad news is a larger core won’t collapse as quickly into an ewrc upon reaching peak. Could still undergo one, but would probably stabilize for a while first. Won’t matter much either way though, it’s hard to bet against a cat5 peak at this point so Jamaica better be taking this seriously

I'm not "downcasting" but I remain a bit doubtful of a Cat 5 peak. Downsloping from Jamaica has interfered with the development of hurricanes in the past (see: Grace 2021), it feels possible that it does so here as well.


We we will need six things to achieve maximum potential intensity (MPI) here (a real possibility), I'll list it from very likely -> unknown:

1) High OHC (obvious we have this)
2) Wind shear to decrease to > 10kt (very likely)
3) Subsidence/dry air entrainment to be minimal (very likely)
4) Efficient outflow to rapidly advect updrafted air away (likely)
5) A pinhole eye to sustain RI to cat 5 (unknown, only mesoscale models can parameterize this)
6) Like you stated, it needs to stay far enough south of Jamaica to not have inflow disrupted (uncertain)

The NHC is following the consensus models (particularly HCCA) and hedging towards the Google DeepMind/EAIFS ensemble tracks currently (they've done shockingly well this year). Looking at mesoscale models that are following this track currently, HAFS-A again has the most accurate run at 12z:
https://i.imgur.com/9dgtsNI.png

HAFS-B has its peak at the same time, but more to the north in location:
https://i.imgur.com/rVLVqBm.png

HMON is similar to HAFS-B
https://i.imgur.com/tdL3qjo.png

I'm not buying the HWRF, as it's track is far too quick (landfall already tomorrow evening in Jamaica):
https://i.imgur.com/RnFgpIR.png

Again, I think the HAFS-A has done really well with the structural changes and speed of Melissa, and is supported by the best performing consensus model and the AI ensemble suite. I think RI is almost certain imo and Cat 4/5 is a real possibility depending on that initial structure (i.e., no EWRC and ability for radial winds to refine a pinhole eye structure).
https://i.imgur.com/KhP5z5D.gif

Something interesting about both HAFS models is that for days they’ve shown Melissa being unable to fully clear out a nice eye, either pinhole or normal-sized. Could be due to structural factors or a tiny bit of shear left inhibiting effective clearing. It may also be an indication that we’ll see a high-end 4 peak, not a Cat 5. Although the difference in impacts between 150 and 160 mph is going to be pretty minimal — an absolute nightmare scenario regardless.
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

Pelicane
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2022 1:52 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#636 Postby Pelicane » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:29 pm

The 12z HAFS-B and A solution would be near-worst case scenarios for the Kingston area, with the core either just to the left or into the harbor.

Also, I did not know that Kingston's international airport is essentially in the middle of the harbor. Seems like a pretty bad place for an airport.

Image

Image

Image
3 likes   

edu2703
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 7:15 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#637 Postby edu2703 » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:40 pm



Probably the worst place you could choose for a major airport in a hurricane-prone area.
2 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10226
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#638 Postby Blown Away » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:41 pm

2:00 PM EDT Sat Oct 25
Location: 16.6°N 75.2°W
Moving: WNW at 1 mph
Min pressure: 980 mb
Max sustained: 75 mph


.1 degree N of 11am and was predicted to move .1 degrees S before W turn. May change angle towards Jamaica?
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148049
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#639 Postby cycloneye » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:42 pm

Breaking News
Dvorak up to 5.0.

A. 13L (MELISSA)

B. 25/1800Z

C. 16.9N

D. 75.4W

E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T5.0/5.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS/GMI

H. REMARKS...LLCC EMBEDDED IN W RESULTS IN A DT OF 5.0. THE MET IS
4.5 BASED ON A RAPID DEVELOPMENT TREND OVER THE PAST 24 HOURS. THE PT
IS 5.0. THE FT IS BASED ON THE PT DUE TO THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE EXACT
CENTER POSITION.
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#640 Postby sasha_B » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:43 pm

H. REMARKS...LLCC EMBEDDED IN W RESULTS IN A DT OF 5.0. THE MET IS
4.5 BASED ON A RAPID DEVELOPMENT TREND OVER THE PAST 24 HOURS. THE PT
IS 5.0. THE FT IS BASED ON THE PT DUE TO THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE EXACT
CENTER POSITION.


We have a T5.0 fix on OSPO's 18z satellite bulletin.
1 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gladstone and 108 guests