ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3401 Postby rtd2 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:58 pm

Sabanic wrote:
Aristotle wrote:
txag2005 wrote:899 MB....Isn't that pressure of a Cat 5????



No thats the number of the beast~~~!!!!!!


A storm that strong would blow that weakness apart!





for sure...talk about creating its on enviroment
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#3402 Postby shah8 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:59 pm

You know...looking at the guidance, I can see why the gfdl and hwrf are showing such severe canes. It goes right over the warmest waters in the gulf, with what appears to be a biggarsed anticyclone over it. The intensity guidance is not that far off, and the chances of a Katrina for Matagorda-Houston area is not low enough.
0 likes   

jimguru
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Centralia, Washington
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3403 Postby jimguru » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:59 pm

Greetings all - maybe someone can help clarify something for me on the models - Why is the LBAR so different than the rest ?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3404 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:59 pm

HWRF takes Ike in at 125kts, 145mph or about the peak of Ike the first time round... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3405 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:00 pm

Odds are not in favor of Ike reaching any of these pressures....
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38090
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3406 Postby Brent » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:01 pm

jimguru wrote:Greetings all - maybe someone can help clarify something for me on the models - Why is the LBAR so different than the rest ?


Because it's the LBAR. :ggreen:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145336
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3407 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:02 pm

I think NHC at 5 PM will go to the middle between the very high intensity of GFDL and HWRF and somewhat lower intensity by SHIP.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aristotle
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Age: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Crowley, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3408 Postby Aristotle » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:03 pm

cycloneye wrote:I think NHC at 5 PM will go to the middle between the very high intensity of GFDL and HWRF and somewhat lower intensity by SHIP.


Whats Ship got for intensity at land fall?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145336
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3409 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:09 pm

Aristotle wrote:
cycloneye wrote:I think NHC at 5 PM will go to the middle between the very high intensity of GFDL and HWRF and somewhat lower intensity by SHIP.


Whats Ship got for intensity at land fall?


This morning SHIP had 81kts.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3410 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:13 pm

They will probably hold the 100kts just like they did last advisory, bang in the middle.
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3411 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:15 pm

cycloneye wrote:I think NHC at 5 PM will go to the middle between the very high intensity of GFDL and HWRF and somewhat lower intensity by SHIP.


Anybody got a link of some good GFS resolutions that show how deep that model goes?
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3412 Postby Nederlander » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:16 pm

this is deja vu with rita
0 likes   

User avatar
JessRomero
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 66
Age: 42
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:34 am
Location: Port Neches Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3413 Postby JessRomero » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:18 pm

Nederlander wrote:this is deja vu with rita



U are thinking what i was thinking I am getting my stuff ready there is too much similar that is what makes me nervous.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3414 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:22 pm

Yep....Rita projected landfall late Friday/Saturday...
Ike projected: about the same (more Saturday)

Monday: Rita models pointed south
Monday: Ike models pointed south

Well, I could go on, but case closed.
0 likes   

User avatar
micktooth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3415 Postby micktooth » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:23 pm

jimguru wrote:Greetings all - maybe someone can help clarify something for me on the models - Why is the LBAR so different than the rest ?


This is from the Hurricane Alley Website:http://www.hurricanealley.net/hurmdls.htm


LBAR (Limited area BARotropic)...
This model is a two-dimensional track prediction model that is initialized with vertically-averaged winds and upper atmospheric air pressures from the Aviation run of the MRF global model. An idealized symmetric vortex is added to the global analysis to represent the storm's circulation. The boundary conditions are obtained from the global model forecast. LBAR is the NHC's implementation of the GFDL VICAR model. (VICBAR stands for Vic Ooyama's Barotropic model.) The storm environment domain analysis is produced with a two-dimensional spectral application of finite element representation, using all available data (rawindsondes, cloud drift winds, aircraft observations, etc.), with the NCEP global model analysis used as a low level background field. The vortex domain analysis consists of synthetic observations representing storm circulation and current storm motion. The vortex is prescribed to be the same size and intensity in all directions (axisymmetric), with winds increasing linearly from the center to the radius of maximum winds. Wind speeds beyond the radius of maximum winds are prescribed to decrease exponentially to the edge of the storm. In the event of multiple tropical cyclones, synthetic vortices are included for each storm. The simplicity of barotropic models means they can be run quickly on inexpensive computers. In the LBAR prediction model, the shallow water equations are solved on a series of nested grid meshes on a Mercator projection. The inner meshes move to remain centered on the storm, while the outer mesh is fixed geographically. Time-dependent boundary conditions from the AVN model run are applied outward from a transition zone between 1500 and 2500 kin. LBAR runs on a 6-hr forecast cycle and produces forecasts out to 72 hr
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

#3416 Postby Steve » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:24 pm

>>Greetings all - maybe someone can help clarify something for me on the models - Why is the LBAR so different than the rest ?

You have guru behind the Jim. :D

Steve
0 likes   

jimguru
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Centralia, Washington
Contact:

Re:

#3417 Postby jimguru » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:28 pm

Steve wrote:>>Greetings all - maybe someone can help clarify something for me on the models - Why is the LBAR so different than the rest ?

You have guru behind the Jim. :D

Steve



True, True - This LBAR is kind of a rogue model almost it seems - Historically does it ever even come close? I am new to Atlantic / Gulf Storm Basin scene.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#3418 Postby RL3AO » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:32 pm

jimguru wrote:
True, True - This LBAR is kind of a rogue model almost it seems - Historically does it ever even come close? I am new to Atlantic / Gulf Storm Basin scene.


Nope. Its almost always an outlier.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#3419 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:34 pm

The 12z GFS offers another very interesting scenario for Oklahoma after landfall. It shows pressures dropping below 1000mb in Oklahoma city with high winds, and very heavy rains! This weekend is going to be downright nasty if this plays out.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_114l.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
Clint_TX
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 8:31 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3420 Postby Clint_TX » Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:35 pm

Nederlander wrote:this is deja vu with rita



I'll take september shortwaves for a 1000 Bob....
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests