ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
18z GFS running : http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes
continue posting 
landfall seems to be the same about 1/2 way between corpus and matagorda, would need a higher resolution to say for sure, certainly not a big swing either way, but its the 18Z run

landfall seems to be the same about 1/2 way between corpus and matagorda, would need a higher resolution to say for sure, certainly not a big swing either way, but its the 18Z run
Last edited by dwg71 on Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Where is landfall on the new GFS? Looks similar to the last run to me, but its such low res I can't tell.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
- Location: Conroe, TX
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
txag2005 wrote:Where is landfall on the new GFS? Looks similar to the last run to me, but its such low res I can't tell.
I am not seeing much difference, looks slightly north of Matagorda Bay to me...
0 likes
- Sabanic
- Category 2
- Posts: 683
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
- Location: Mobile, AL
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Hey dwg wasn't the GFS the furthest south on it's previous run?
Wonder what it's seeing?
Wonder what it's seeing?
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Nederlander wrote:txag2005 wrote:Where is landfall on the new GFS? Looks similar to the last run to me, but its such low res I can't tell.
I am not seeing much difference, looks slightly north of Matagorda Bay to me...

Landfall at 66 hours.
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Latest GFS trough isn't there in time. Track should solidify like NHC did with Gus. Houston could be playing it tight and dodging a bullet at the last second.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Sanibel wrote:Latest GFS trough isn't there in time. Track should solidify like NHC did with Gus. Houston could be playing it tight and dodging a bullet at the last second.
If it speeds up a little it will be further south. I supect that is a little slow of a run by a few hours, my opinion.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Sanibel wrote:Latest GFS trough isn't there in time. Track should solidify like NHC did with Gus. Houston could be playing it tight and dodging a bullet at the last second.
So you live by the GFS?
Trof is there in plenty of time. FYI...NHC wanted the track more east but didn't want to take a big jump just yet.
Where they hinted at putting it would give the HOU area the worst wacking since Carla
Dodging a bullet? You were saying?
Come on...
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Air Force Met wrote:Sanibel wrote:Latest GFS trough isn't there in time. Track should solidify like NHC did with Gus. Houston could be playing it tight and dodging a bullet at the last second.
So you live by the GFS?
Trof is there in plenty of time. FYI...NHC wanted the track more east but didn't want to take a big jump just yet.
Where they hinted at putting it would give the HOU area the worst wacking since Carla
Dodging a bullet? You were saying?
Come on...
Let me guess...Freeport?
Afraid the bullet has found its mark.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
We'll see at 11. You are arguing with GFS not me. My position is whether GFDL is straying like it did west of Florida already or whether it is dead accurate early on as it has been with trends. GFDL is obviously less accurate when not under a strong ridge. My last word was start worrying if GFDL goes even more east.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Air Force Met wrote:Sanibel wrote:Latest GFS trough isn't there in time. Track should solidify like NHC did with Gus. Houston could be playing it tight and dodging a bullet at the last second.
So you live by the GFS?
Trof is there in plenty of time. FYI...NHC wanted the track more east but didn't want to take a big jump just yet.
Where they hinted at putting it would give the HOU area the worst wacking since Carla
Dodging a bullet? You were saying?
Come on...
So AFM, time to earn more than your government salary on Ike. Lots of noise on this board but little knowledge most times. What are your thoughts on strength and landfall for Ike? What models or conditions should we be looking at for any tweaks to the forecast. 12z GFDL through the Galveston area -probably need a couple of more runs to nail this down but I find the GFDL has been pretty accurate. within 72 hrs
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
ronjon wrote:
So AFM, time to earn more than your government salary on Ike. Lots of noise on this board but little knowledge most times. What are your thoughts on strength and landfall for Ike? What models or conditions should we be looking at for any tweaks to the forecast. 12z GFDL through the Galveston area -probably need a couple of more runs to nail this down but I find the GFDL has been pretty accurate. within 72 hrs
Same as the last few days. Matagorda area...Cat 3.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests