ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Hurricanewatcher2007
- Category 2
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm
Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico
highest winds so far 46kts with a pressure of 1010mb so still a ways out.
Edit: Now highest is 49kts with a pressure of 1008
Edit: Now highest is 49kts with a pressure of 1008
0 likes
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
Like it? I wanna marry it!
0 likes
- TexasSam
- Category 2
- Posts: 573
- Age: 66
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 12:16 am
- Location: Port Arthur, Texas
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
no landfall, and moving up the coast? I sure hope not!
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
Haha i bet a lot of people are cheering for this track. If it does make this turn we are going to have a HUGE disaster on our hands.
0 likes
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
That is scary, just what I predicted.
0 likes
- Hurricanewatcher2007
- Category 2
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm
- Texas Snowman
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 6180
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
- Location: Denison, Texas
Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico
That would be bad news for the CC, PA, Rockport area if it jogged inland around or north of Baffin Bay.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico
right up sanibel's alley!
Plus some major, major strengthening would have to happen in a hurry.
Plus some major, major strengthening would have to happen in a hurry.
Last edited by Wx_Warrior on Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 164
- Age: 41
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:47 pm
- Location: SETX
Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico
I think being in the GOM its not so much the direction shes going but her current intensity that is not attracting more to this thread.For me there is still far to many possibilities not to not want to watch it with close observation. I think it'd be foolish of anybody to assume since its moving at 17mph that it'll surely be doing that 24 hours from now. I highly doubt the current trend is going to follow until landfall.
This is just my opinion definantly nothing more,
To me it appears to be shifting back into a more NW direction, and giving my understanding of the other factors at play ( which is very little ) it leads me to believe at some point its going to have a much greater northerly direction before landfall, if thats true how soon that takes place should make a difference on landfall on final destination. I'm getting the impression that other posters think its going to maintain its current speed at the same time stay weak. From my understanding of it all its current speed would favor strengthening more so than if it slows as predicted. I haven't really tried to guess at intensity yet but I thought she would of increased higher much sooner as many of you did. But that still doesn't stop me from thinking she'll be intensifying at significant rate in the morning. That being said I still think there many small changes in the factors between now and then that could take place to place the Corpus Christi area in the target zone.
Please discuss
This is just my opinion definantly nothing more,
To me it appears to be shifting back into a more NW direction, and giving my understanding of the other factors at play ( which is very little ) it leads me to believe at some point its going to have a much greater northerly direction before landfall, if thats true how soon that takes place should make a difference on landfall on final destination. I'm getting the impression that other posters think its going to maintain its current speed at the same time stay weak. From my understanding of it all its current speed would favor strengthening more so than if it slows as predicted. I haven't really tried to guess at intensity yet but I thought she would of increased higher much sooner as many of you did. But that still doesn't stop me from thinking she'll be intensifying at significant rate in the morning. That being said I still think there many small changes in the factors between now and then that could take place to place the Corpus Christi area in the target zone.
Please discuss

0 likes
Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico
Where is the center suppose to be, looks like 23.8N, 93.2 W to me
0 likes
Re: Re:
americanrebel wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
That is scary, just what I predicted.
Seriously, you should get like 100,000 amateur forecast points!

0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm
Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico
Smurfwicked wrote:I think being in the GOM its not so much the direction shes going but her current intensity that is not attracting more to this thread.For me there is still far to many possibilities not to not want to watch it with close observation. I think it'd be foolish of anybody to assume since its moving at 17mph that it'll surely be doing that 24 hours from now. I highly doubt the current trend is going to follow until landfall.
This is just my opinion definantly nothing more,
To me it appears to be shifting back into a more NW direction, and giving my understanding of the other factors at play ( which is very little ) it leads me to believe at some point its going to have a much greater northerly direction before landfall, if thats true how soon that takes place should make a difference on landfall on final destination. I'm getting the impression that other posters think its going to maintain its current speed at the same time stay weak. From my understanding of it all its current speed would favor strengthening more so than if it slows as predicted. I haven't really tried to guess at intensity yet but I thought she would of increased higher much sooner as many of you did. But that still doesn't stop me from thinking she'll be intensifying at significant rate in the morning. That being said I still think there many small changes in the factors between now and then that could take place to place the Corpus Christi area in the target zone.
Please discuss
I agree this COULD happen. If the ridge does weaken enough then we could have this. The thing that is so bad about this, is we won't know until right before landfall if it will happen or not.
0 likes
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
AND it should be noted that it has a VERY VERY good track record on it's forecast verifing in many situations including snow, and severe weather events. really this would be the first time looking at it in a tropical situation, but I do have to give it a bit of weight based on it's track record on other events.
0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6110
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Re:
jhamps10 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
AND it should be noted that it has a VERY VERY good track record on it's forecast verifing in many situations including snow, and severe weather events. really this would be the first time looking at it in a tropical situation, but I do have to give it a bit of weight based on it's track record on other events.
what model is this?
0 likes
Re: Re:
Duddy wrote:americanrebel wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
That is scary, just what I predicted.
Seriously, you should get like 100,000 amateur forecast points!
Do we really need the sarcasm? I was just making an observation.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: Re:
jhamps10 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
AND it should be noted that it has a VERY VERY good track record on it's forecast verifing in many situations including snow, and severe weather events. really this would be the first time looking at it in a tropical situation, but I do have to give it a bit of weight based on it's track record on other events.
eh... it's either really good or really crappy with severe wx events. Not sure how it performs on TC's given that the other situations you present are more midlatitude in nature.
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
The simulated radar is beyond cool! I don't know why I've never seen this feature before.
0 likes
- Texashawk
- Category 2
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)
Re:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html
Perhaps a stupid question, but what model is that and who maintains it?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests