ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6001 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:02 am

highest winds so far 46kts with a pressure of 1010mb so still a ways out.

Edit: Now highest is 49kts with a pressure of 1008
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#6002 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:12 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Duddy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re:

#6003 Postby Duddy » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:15 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


Like it? I wanna marry it!
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasSam
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 573
Age: 66
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 12:16 am
Location: Port Arthur, Texas

Re:

#6004 Postby TexasSam » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:16 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


no landfall, and moving up the coast? I sure hope not!
0 likes   

paintplaye
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm

Re:

#6005 Postby paintplaye » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:17 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html



Haha i bet a lot of people are cheering for this track. If it does make this turn we are going to have a HUGE disaster on our hands.
0 likes   

americanrebel

Re:

#6006 Postby americanrebel » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:17 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


That is scary, just what I predicted.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6007 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:17 am

54kts with a pressure of 1006mb
0 likes   

User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6180
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6008 Postby Texas Snowman » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:18 am

That would be bad news for the CC, PA, Rockport area if it jogged inland around or north of Baffin Bay.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6009 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:20 am

right up sanibel's alley!

Plus some major, major strengthening would have to happen in a hurry.
Last edited by Wx_Warrior on Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Smurfwicked
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 164
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: SETX

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6010 Postby Smurfwicked » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:21 am

I think being in the GOM its not so much the direction shes going but her current intensity that is not attracting more to this thread.For me there is still far to many possibilities not to not want to watch it with close observation. I think it'd be foolish of anybody to assume since its moving at 17mph that it'll surely be doing that 24 hours from now. I highly doubt the current trend is going to follow until landfall.

This is just my opinion definantly nothing more,

To me it appears to be shifting back into a more NW direction, and giving my understanding of the other factors at play ( which is very little ) it leads me to believe at some point its going to have a much greater northerly direction before landfall, if thats true how soon that takes place should make a difference on landfall on final destination. I'm getting the impression that other posters think its going to maintain its current speed at the same time stay weak. From my understanding of it all its current speed would favor strengthening more so than if it slows as predicted. I haven't really tried to guess at intensity yet but I thought she would of increased higher much sooner as many of you did. But that still doesn't stop me from thinking she'll be intensifying at significant rate in the morning. That being said I still think there many small changes in the factors between now and then that could take place to place the Corpus Christi area in the target zone.

Please discuss :)
0 likes   

americanrebel

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6011 Postby americanrebel » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:21 am

Where is the center suppose to be, looks like 23.8N, 93.2 W to me
0 likes   

User avatar
Duddy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: Re:

#6012 Postby Duddy » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:23 am

americanrebel wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


That is scary, just what I predicted.


Seriously, you should get like 100,000 amateur forecast points! :eek:
0 likes   

paintplaye
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm

Re: ATL: TS Dolly in Southern Gulf of Mexico

#6013 Postby paintplaye » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:24 am

Smurfwicked wrote:I think being in the GOM its not so much the direction shes going but her current intensity that is not attracting more to this thread.For me there is still far to many possibilities not to not want to watch it with close observation. I think it'd be foolish of anybody to assume since its moving at 17mph that it'll surely be doing that 24 hours from now. I highly doubt the current trend is going to follow until landfall.

This is just my opinion definantly nothing more,

To me it appears to be shifting back into a more NW direction, and giving my understanding of the other factors at play ( which is very little ) it leads me to believe at some point its going to have a much greater northerly direction before landfall, if thats true how soon that takes place should make a difference on landfall on final destination. I'm getting the impression that other posters think its going to maintain its current speed at the same time stay weak. From my understanding of it all its current speed would favor strengthening more so than if it slows as predicted. I haven't really tried to guess at intensity yet but I thought she would of increased higher much sooner as many of you did. But that still doesn't stop me from thinking she'll be intensifying at significant rate in the morning. That being said I still think there many small changes in the factors between now and then that could take place to place the Corpus Christi area in the target zone.

Please discuss :)


I agree this COULD happen. If the ridge does weaken enough then we could have this. The thing that is so bad about this, is we won't know until right before landfall if it will happen or not.
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re:

#6014 Postby jhamps10 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:25 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


AND it should be noted that it has a VERY VERY good track record on it's forecast verifing in many situations including snow, and severe weather events. really this would be the first time looking at it in a tropical situation, but I do have to give it a bit of weight based on it's track record on other events.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6110
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Re:

#6015 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:26 am

jhamps10 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


AND it should be noted that it has a VERY VERY good track record on it's forecast verifing in many situations including snow, and severe weather events. really this would be the first time looking at it in a tropical situation, but I do have to give it a bit of weight based on it's track record on other events.

what model is this?
0 likes   

americanrebel

Re: Re:

#6016 Postby americanrebel » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:27 am

Duddy wrote:
americanrebel wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


That is scary, just what I predicted.


Seriously, you should get like 100,000 amateur forecast points! :eek:


Do we really need the sarcasm? I was just making an observation.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Re:

#6017 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:28 am

jhamps10 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


AND it should be noted that it has a VERY VERY good track record on it's forecast verifing in many situations including snow, and severe weather events. really this would be the first time looking at it in a tropical situation, but I do have to give it a bit of weight based on it's track record on other events.

eh... it's either really good or really crappy with severe wx events. Not sure how it performs on TC's given that the other situations you present are more midlatitude in nature.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re:

#6018 Postby PTrackerLA » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:28 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


The simulated radar is beyond cool! I don't know why I've never seen this feature before.
0 likes   

User avatar
Texashawk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)

Re:

#6019 Postby Texashawk » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:30 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think you all will like this ...

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll ... te_1h.html


Perhaps a stupid question, but what model is that and who maintains it?
0 likes   

User avatar
Duddy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: Re:

#6020 Postby Duddy » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:30 am

Do we really need the sarcasm? I was just making an observation.


I wasn't being sarcastic! Seriously, you made an awesome call! ^_^

I'm not a sarcastic person. I consider it to be VERY rude.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests