ATL: Ex INVEST 93L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#21 Postby johngaltfla » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:51 pm

Well, my prediction is still alive at least. I just hope I am at the end of this season. I wonder if the first two weeks will give us some more fishes to lull everyone in the U.S. into a false sense of security. I just can not see this storm making the trek all the way across if it encounters similar shear to that which zapped Colin.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#22 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:51 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:where did you read/watch that? i wanna see it!


its on the pro site. Basically his theory is the biggest seasons US happen when the highest 500mb height anomaly's are over the NE US/Southern Canada which the ensemble models are forecasting in 10 to 15 days.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#23 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:55 pm

would those steering currents be supportive of a gulf-landfalling storm?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#24 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:00 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#25 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:27 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:would those steering currents be supportive of a gulf-landfalling storm?


Yes, but not this invest. Looks like it has a clear shot to track off into the open Atlantic.
0 likes   

User avatar
MiamiHurricanes10
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#26 Postby MiamiHurricanes10 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:28 pm

After doing some analysis, it seems to me that 93L will become Danielle. However, this looks like a prime candidate for a recurvature.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#27 Postby Macrocane » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:48 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:where did you read/watch that? i wanna see it!


He explains that on this video that was on the public site of Accuweather:

http://www.accuweather.com/video/73146202001/no-changes-to-my-hurricane-idea.asp
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#28 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:38 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1792
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#29 Postby hurricaneCW » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:40 pm

Are any of these storms not going to recurve. I thought this was moderate la nina. All these early recurves of pathetic TS curving into the TUTT is pathetic.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#30 Postby Ptarmigan » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:45 pm

If conditions are good, it could be Danielle. I think its path could change over time. If it was a fish storm, the ACE would go up. :wink:
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#31 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:48 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:Are any of these storms not going to recurve. I thought this was moderate la nina. All these early recurves of pathetic TS curving into the TUTT is pathetic.


Sorry a destructive tropical cyclone hasn't hit the US yet to excite you.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#32 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:50 pm

MiamiHurricanes10 wrote:After doing some analysis, it seems to me that 93L will become Danielle. However, this looks like a prime candidate for a recurvature.


I think we are all pretty confident that 93L is going to recurve. I think the quest is whether the one behind it will recurve. If high pressure builds in after 93L recruves, then the wave behind it might be pushed westward.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3323
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#33 Postby fci » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:59 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:Are any of these storms not going to recurve. I thought this was moderate la nina. All these early recurves of pathetic TS curving into the TUTT is pathetic.

Well, I love recurves. Not at all pathetic to me!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143864
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#34 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:02 pm

Fish cyclones are the best to track as you can look at the structure in detail and see what mother nature offers.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

supercane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

#35 Postby supercane » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:10 pm

Map made from CIMSS TCTrak with shear overlay:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#36 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:21 pm

fci wrote:
hurricaneCW wrote:Are any of these storms not going to recurve. I thought this was moderate la nina. All these early recurves of pathetic TS curving into the TUTT is pathetic.

Well, I love recurves. Not at all pathetic to me!



I love recurves if they travel west for awhile and develop before the recurve. It just seems like once they start recurving they start
moving ahead so quickly because they get up on the ULL etc, that they lose all of their structure and beauty.

Unfortunately this suppose to be recurving fairly quickly, so there isn't going to be much to look at while it races northwest or north north west...
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#37 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:22 pm

Re-Firing nicely tonight. Definitely liking this area as well.


Tropics coming alive tonight. If we can get Danielle from one of these two waves we'd be looking strong still number wise and definitely ahead of 2004.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#38 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:22 pm

Macrocane wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:where did you read/watch that? i wanna see it!


He explains that on this video that was on the public site of Accuweather:

http://www.accuweather.com/video/73146202001/no-changes-to-my-hurricane-idea.asp


thanks. im not giving up on the season yet or calling it a bust thanks to joe. the next couples of months look exciting!
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1792
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#39 Postby hurricaneCW » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:37 pm

I think the true measure of an active season is by its ACE, not # of storms generated. We can have 20 weak, recurving TS, but with an ACE below 100, it's a quiet season. Plus this one is going out to sea instantly so the best we see is another Bonnie/Colin type storm, which is a shame because I really thought Danielle would be the big one.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15827
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#40 Postby Kingarabian » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:27 am

hurricaneCW wrote:I think the true measure of an active season is by its ACE, not # of storms generated. We can have 20 weak, recurving TS, but with an ACE below 100, it's a quiet season. Plus this one is going out to sea instantly so the best we see is another Bonnie/Colin type storm, which is a shame because I really thought Danielle would be the big one.


So you want a big one to not re-curve?
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests