HURAKAN wrote:

Moderator: S2k Moderators
HURAKAN wrote:
gatorcane wrote:I wouldn't count on it decoupling over the Yucatan/Mexico. In fact it has a really nice structure still. I'm looking for it to intensify back to TS status by later on this evening, once it has been over water for for several hours.
Good news though is that it continues to move nearly due W it seems, so the more west it goes could mean the difference in the end for those farther upstream in Texas.
gatorcane wrote:When does everybody think Alex will be back over water?
HURAKAN wrote:
Soon to be over water
HurricaneStriker wrote:Convection with Alex looks very impressive on the east side of the storm, but the west side is almost 'convection free'. Looks like there's a big rainband cooking up in the northeast.
Hurricane Andrew wrote:I have been discussing this on accuweather.com, what caused the weakening? Shear or overlandness?
HURAKAN wrote:Hurricane Andrew wrote:Hey Hurakan,where do you think this will hit? (second landfall)
Unsure at this point bc computer models keep flip-flopping.
ConvergenceZone wrote:KWT, yep, because of it's current direction, every hour that goes by is making a Texas landfall less and less likely. But then again, I don't think anyone really expects it to hit Texas anyway...Gotta keep it in the cone though for peace of mind.
lester88 wrote:Hurricane Andrew wrote:I have been discussing this on accuweather.com, what caused the weakening? Shear or overlandness?
It's overland. Cyclones weaken over land. (At least most storms do)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests