hurricanetrack wrote:It is mid-July, if there was not a lot of dry air in the MDR I would be quite worried and for a completely different reason
It's more than normal though.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
hurricanetrack wrote:It is mid-July, if there was not a lot of dry air in the MDR I would be quite worried and for a completely different reason
StormTracker wrote:Forgive me if this question has already been posted, but does anyone know if there have ever been two or more consecutive "extremely dud" (a.k.a.: last season) seasons in the recorded history of hurricane seasons???
weatherwindow wrote:StormTracker wrote:Forgive me if this question has already been posted, but does anyone know if there have ever been two or more consecutive "extremely dud" (a.k.a.: last season) seasons in the recorded history of hurricane seasons???
Several series of consecutive multiple "duds"....1981, 82, 83, 84...93, 94...and many others since 1851...Many of these very quiet seasons are associated with the negative phase of the AMO(thermohaline circulation) and/or El Ninos...However, as evidenced by 2012/2013, they are not restricted to only those backround conditions....Grtz from KW, Rich
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atlantic/
HurricaneFan wrote:Is that pouch 4L just East of the Islands on the ECMWF 10 days from now?That should hit the Islands in the 2 next days(on Monday,July 28th) on that graphic if it pans out?
PTrackerLA wrote:That CFS run is interesting. Is it ever remotely correct 30 days out?
Hurricaneman wrote:PTrackerLA wrote:That CFS run is interesting. Is it ever remotely correct 30 days out?
shows something crossing florida around Melbourne on the 17th of August which is really dubious in that range at best but one thing to take from it though is that the MDR is forecast from the CFS to become a lot more favorable as we come to the peak of hurricane season and definitely tons more favorable than last year so IMO around the late part of the month or Early August need to be watched if the CFS is even remotely close
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
TheStormExpert wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:PTrackerLA wrote:That CFS run is interesting. Is it ever remotely correct 30 days out?
shows something crossing florida around Melbourne on the 17th of August which is really dubious in that range at best but one thing to take from it though is that the MDR is forecast from the CFS to become a lot more favorable as we come to the peak of hurricane season and definitely tons more favorable than last year so IMO around the late part of the month or Early August need to be watched if the CFS is even remotely close
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
My question is did the CFS show it being active like this last year, and how reliable is the CFS this far out to start getting ideas?
TheStormExpert wrote:My question is did the CFS show it being active like this last year, and how reliable is the CFS this far out to start getting ideas?
blp wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:My question is did the CFS show it being active like this last year, and how reliable is the CFS this far out to start getting ideas?
Last year it did not have nowhere near the level of activity you are seeing now, so it did good with predicting the slow season. I have looked at the CFS often the past several years and in IMO it does help with picking out patterns. For instance, it was helpful in showing the pattern of troughs in the MDR during 2012. So you need to take CFS as a possible predictor of pattern and activity levels but not for a specific area of development.
blp wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:My question is did the CFS show it being active like this last year, and how reliable is the CFS this far out to start getting ideas?
Last year it did not have nowhere near the level of activity you are seeing now, so it did good with predicting the slow season. I have looked at the CFS often the past several years and in IMO it does help with picking out patterns. For instance, it was helpful in showing the pattern of troughs in the MDR during 2012. So you need to take CFS as a possible predictor of pattern and activity levels but not for a specific area of development.
Yellow Evan wrote:
How did it do in 2009?
I think it's good in the EPAC for such long range.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests