drezee wrote:King Euro: "Hey GFS, everybody's got a Daddy...."



Moderator: S2k Moderators
drezee wrote:King Euro: "Hey GFS, everybody's got a Daddy...."
Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:moving west of north at 90 hours
Looks like it's going to barely clear NYC. Maybe a New England hit. Looks like it's still moving NNE to me.
Blizzard96x wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:moving west of north at 90 hours
Looks like it's going to barely clear NYC. Maybe a New England hit. Looks like it's still moving NNE to me.
And what makes you think GooFuS has a clue on this run? It didnt have one at 00z and it wont have one at 06z IMO.
Blizzard96x wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:moving west of north at 90 hours
Looks like it's going to barely clear NYC. Maybe a New England hit. Looks like it's still moving NNE to me.
And what makes you think GooFuS has a clue on this run? It didnt have one at 00z and it wont have one at 06z IMO.
I just has a feeling it would especially after that loop run.xironman wrote:The GFS folds.
Kingarabian wrote:Uhh. It has all the G-IV data now and a better handle on the steering. It's okay to make mistakes as long as you fix them. It's becoming more and more likely now that the Euro solution is verifying and that's why I buy this run.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Blizzard96x wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Uhh. It has all the G-IV data now and a better handle on the steering. It's okay to make mistakes as long as you fix them. It's becoming more and more likely now that the Euro solution is verifying and that's why I buy this run.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Yes, and the Euro is no where close to the 6z GFS even though they both miss. Point is, throw the GFS out, still trending.
Alyono wrote:EC shows a much more significant 500mb weakness with the remnants of Ida. Joaquin simply ignores the strong cutoff low over the SE USA
We need dropsondes there... near Ida
Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:EC shows a much more significant 500mb weakness with the remnants of Ida. Joaquin simply ignores the strong cutoff low over the SE USA
We need dropsondes there... near Ida
What about Joaquin continuing to move south of the current forecast? Doesn't that dictate the track to be more NE?
Alyono wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:EC shows a much more significant 500mb weakness with the remnants of Ida. Joaquin simply ignores the strong cutoff low over the SE USA
We need dropsondes there... near Ida
What about Joaquin continuing to move south of the current forecast? Doesn't that dictate the track to be more NE?
it's due to the 500mb low. It is very large on the ECMWF. If that weakness is not as pronounced, it will hook into the coast. That is the forecast issue. What happens with that weakness
Had the EC not have shifted right initially, it likely would have had a landfall as that is one strong cutoff
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests