ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- HurricaneBelle
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
- Location: Clearwater, FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
SouthDadeFish wrote:Recon measured a closed eyewall of 16 nm and a central pressure of 940/941 mb in Matthew. Some slight strengthening compared to the previous flight.
Just based on satellite appearance and cloud top temps, it appears to be going through a strengthening phase now. Shear also lower than yesterday.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
SouthDadeFish wrote:Recon measured a closed eyewall of 16 nm and a central pressure of 940/941 mb in Matthew. Some slight strengthening compared to the previous flight.
Dropsonde measured a 131 knot winds at the surface, so I would think they will increase its winds
Significant Wind Levels
Level Wind Direction Wind Speed
853mb (Surface) 115° (from the ESE) 131 knots (151 mph)
850mb 115° (from the ESE) 131 knots (151 mph)
773mb 120° (from the ESE) 135 knots (155 mph)
752mb 135° (from the SE) 114 knots (131 mph)
721mb 145° (from the SE) 121 knots (139 mph)
698mb 150° (from the SSE) 106 knots (122 mph)
0 likes
- SouthDadeFish
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
NDG wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:Recon measured a closed eyewall of 16 nm and a central pressure of 940/941 mb in Matthew. Some slight strengthening compared to the previous flight.
Dropsonde measured a 131 knot winds at the surface, so I would think they will increase its winds
Significant Wind Levels
Level Wind Direction Wind Speed
853mb (Surface) 115° (from the ESE) 131 knots (151 mph)
850mb 115° (from the ESE) 131 knots (151 mph)
773mb 120° (from the ESE) 135 knots (155 mph)
752mb 135° (from the SE) 114 knots (131 mph)
721mb 145° (from the SE) 121 knots (139 mph)
698mb 150° (from the SSE) 106 knots (122 mph)
I think there was an error with this report. It claims the surface is 853 mb, which is not true. It likely stopped reporting halfway through the drop, for some reason.
0 likes
- HurricaneBelle
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
- Location: Clearwater, FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
SouthDadeFish wrote:NDG wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:Recon measured a closed eyewall of 16 nm and a central pressure of 940/941 mb in Matthew. Some slight strengthening compared to the previous flight.
Dropsonde measured a 131 knot winds at the surface, so I would think they will increase its winds
Significant Wind Levels
Level Wind Direction Wind Speed
853mb (Surface) 115° (from the ESE) 131 knots (151 mph)
850mb 115° (from the ESE) 131 knots (151 mph)
773mb 120° (from the ESE) 135 knots (155 mph)
752mb 135° (from the SE) 114 knots (131 mph)
721mb 145° (from the SE) 121 knots (139 mph)
698mb 150° (from the SSE) 106 knots (122 mph)
I think there was an error with this report. It claims the surface is 853 mb, which is not true. It likely stopped reporting halfway through the drop, for some reason.
Nice catch, I didn't see that!
0 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Matthew has been moving due North all night (and maybe a hair West of North in the last few satellite frames). I'm still not fully buying into the expected NNE movement later today, but if it does, Haiti will get a direct hit.
The 00z ECMWF, and it's ensembles, are worrying for me in North Florida, but it's only one run. I won't be surprised if it flops back east this afternoon.
Today should be fun for recon. Four missions today, for maximum storm coverage. Additionally, NHC is sending out the G-IV every 12 hours to collect atmospheric data.
The 00z ECMWF, and it's ensembles, are worrying for me in North Florida, but it's only one run. I won't be surprised if it flops back east this afternoon.
Today should be fun for recon. Four missions today, for maximum storm coverage. Additionally, NHC is sending out the G-IV every 12 hours to collect atmospheric data.
0 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Northern eyewall still looking strong.
Center fix, about an hour ago, measured a 4C core temp.

Center fix, about an hour ago, measured a 4C core temp.

0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Good WV view of the GOM trough moving east, and the ridge (dark area eroding):
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Frank2 wrote:Good WV view of the GOM trough moving east, and the ridge (dark area eroding):
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
Frank from the look of that, you'd think the high wouldn't be filling in as much as some of these models are pointing...
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4032
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
That high does indeed look like it's eroding.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
- Happy Pelican
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:12 pm
- Location: Pelican Island, Jersey Shore
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
GoneBabyGone wrote:I know the focus is on Jamaica/Haiti/Florida right now, and my thoughts go out to those residents and I hope the storm busts, but how are we looking in the Jersey Shore area? Too early to say?
My main concern as well. Luckily supply wise, still stocked from Hermine but with multiple houses in my neighborhood up on cribbing while being lifted, I take any and all potential threats very seriously. My Sandy PTSD is in high gear and it's something I'll have to manage possibly for the rest of my life.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145769
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
1 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- JtSmarts
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1437
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
- Location: Columbia, South Carolina
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:Must see video by Mark Sudduth.
https://twitter.com/hurricanetrack/status/782928087080054785
I'm inhaling every video Mark and Levi put out!
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Frank2 wrote:Good WV view of the GOM trough moving east, and the ridge (dark area eroding):
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
Yes. Looks like 98L also has been able to assist in the erosion of the ridge. It starting to look like the NHC forecast line will verify very well (within 50 miles). The trough in the rockies also looks fairly formidable and progressive. Have to see if it slows down any. (dont see anything that would slow it down)
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:31 am
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Matthew is a bit frustrating. I went to bed last night (Prior to this mornings Euro run) knowing the GFS, Euro and even the last Ukmet run all started to show consensus that it would stay well enough offshore from FL. I wake up to a Euro surprise. Now I'm likely to not be very productive at work because I'll be anticipating the next runs to see if GFS follows Euro. 

1 likes
Heather
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7188
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
SapphireSea wrote:Frank2 wrote:Good WV view of the GOM trough moving east, and the ridge (dark area eroding):
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
Yes. Looks like 98L also has been able to assist in the erosion of the ridge. It starting to look like the NHC forecast line will verify very well (within 50 miles). The trough in the rockies also looks fairly formidable and progressive. Have to see if it slows down any. (dont see anything that would slow it down)
thats fine for today and tomorrow but that troughiness probably wont be there in three days and the ridge builds back in enough to send it back towards florida and nc
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7188
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
this is why we dont sound the all clear even though the cone wasnt over SE florida...we knew the ridging was the big question..it could trend back east but that becomes less likely now as we are getting closer to approach..another day of west trend and its a big problem..i predict nhc brings the track west a bit at 11 at days 3,4,5..they can keep going down the middle if they want but the trend is thereFLLurker32 wrote:Matthew is a bit frustrating. I went to bed last night (Prior to this mornings Euro run) knowing the GFS, Euro and even the last Ukmet run all started to show consensus that it would stay well enough offshore from FL. I wake up to a Euro surprise. Now I'm likely to not be very productive at work because I'll be anticipating the next runs to see if GFS follows Euro.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
I still think the biggest short term issue is the mid-level low over New York this morning. GFS and Euro have some decent differences with that system over the next 24 to 72 hours. I think it's one of the reasons the GFS is faster. As we know, faster has rarely been correct with Matthew.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests