ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
plasticup wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:935mb over Miami in 144 hours on the 12z Euro.
That would be a history storm...
how strong is that thanks

0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Even 6-days out there is only about a 50 mile difference in position between the GFS, Euro, and CMC.
1 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
tarheelprogrammer wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:
And that is low res right?
Yeah high-res is 926mb.
What is the wind speed?
Sustained winds to hurricane force, with gusts of 130 mph.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
tgenius wrote:Yikes. At very least would be midday and not at midnight.
And at low tide, which on 9/21 is 0700 EDT. That will help.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Not a good run for FL, if the 12z ECMWF is correct, that is a big ridge diving SE from southern Canada/Great Lakes area towards the NE US that could bend the track west up the FL Peninsula
2 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
12Z Euro never brings the eye onshore in Florida. Remember, 100 mile miss to the east is a big big big deal...see Matthew
3 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1753
- Age: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
NDG wrote:Not a good run for FL, if the 12z ECMWF is correct, that is a big ridge diving SE from southern Canada/Great Lakes area towards the NE US that could bend the track west up the FL Peninsula
Euro back/still offshore at 168 moving pretty fast. High building overhead, trough retreating and Jose closing in. System at 937mb and threatening GA/SC. Looks like an SC hit unless it follows the trough and it doesn't have much time to do that.
Last edited by Steve on Mon Sep 04, 2017 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
fox13weather wrote:12Z Euro never brings the eye onshore in Florida. Remember, 100 mile miss to the east is a big big big deal...see Matthew
I know. But you're playing with fire, here.
3 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
KWT wrote:Models are in real good agreement at day 5 about the location of Irma being just to the north of Cuba. Whilst this may shift around a little the general location will probably be about right now. Of course small shifts makes the differencve between a major hitting Cuba and it staying offshore and instead smashing the southern Bahamas islands.
And it's this tight consensus that has me worried. Not often you see this tight of a consensus, and it's been solidly tight for the past day. Normally, 6 days out you can laugh at being at the center of the models, but the forecast feels much more credible this time around. There is an almost certainty of a major hurricane off Florida's doorstep in 5 days. What happens after that is still unclear, but it's hard to see a scenario right now where some part of Florida isn't getting walloped.
There seems to be more clarity with Irma 7 days out, then there was with Matthew 4/5 days out before it was clear it was Florida-bound.
0 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:09 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
fox13weather wrote:12Z Euro never brings the eye onshore in Florida. Remember, 100 mile miss to the east is a big big big deal...see Matthew
Won't Irma have a much larger windfield?
1 likes
- northjaxpro
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Steve wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:935mb over Miami in 144 hours on the 12z Euro.
Utter destruction part 1. Big massive high building east across Canada so if it gets offshore, it's more likely to come north than follow the trough. I'd give odds on that 75/25
I agree!
2 likes
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
fox13weather wrote:12Z Euro never brings the eye onshore in Florida. Remember, 100 mile miss to the east is a big big big deal...see Matthew
Correct. there is ample time for a rightward adjustment which would spare Florida at the expense of the Bahamas and probably some points north. It looks like someone's gonna pay rent with this one though...just too soon to know who.
2 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Another west shift.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
HurricaneFrances04 wrote:fox13weather wrote:12Z Euro never brings the eye onshore in Florida. Remember, 100 mile miss to the east is a big big big deal...see Matthew
Won't Irma have a much larger windfield?
Impacts on the west side of hurricanes are always exaggerated....See Corpus Christi in Harvey. If you stay out of the eyewall...it's not a bad outcome at all....
2 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Steve wrote:NDG wrote:Not a good run for FL, if the 12z ECMWF is correct, that is a big ridge diving SE from southern Canada/Great Lakes area towards the NE US that could bend the track west up the FL Peninsula
Euro back/still offshore at 168 moving pretty fast. High building overhead, trough retreating and Jose closing in. System at 937mb and threatening GA/SC. Looks like an SC hit unless it follows the trough and it doesn't have much time to do that.
That's a big ridge to the north moving into NE US.
I don't like how slowly it moves up the coast, could be very damaging to SE coastal FL, if this run is correct.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
joey wrote:plasticup wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:935mb over Miami in 144 hours on the 12z Euro.
That would be a historic storm...
how strong is that thanks
It doesn't correlate perfectly with wind speed, but 935 mb would generally be a category 4, winds in the 135-145 mph range. I may be wrong about this, but I don't think that a category 4 direct hit on a major US city has ever happened in the modern era.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
fox13weather wrote:HurricaneFrances04 wrote:fox13weather wrote:12Z Euro never brings the eye onshore in Florida. Remember, 100 mile miss to the east is a big big big deal...see Matthew
Won't Irma have a much larger windfield?
Impacts on the west side of hurricanes are always exaggerated....See Corpus Christi in Harvey. If you stay out of the eyewall...it's not a bad outcome at all....
No single storm is alike! Besides it gets much closer to the Florida east coast when compared to Matthew.
2 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests