ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
joey
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:11 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7881 Postby joey » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:11 am

NFLnut wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
sponger wrote:A much better result for Florida. Worse for GA, NC/SC


I'm not sure it's a better result for the SE Fla metro areas though..the three major globals either have a landfall or pass 30 miles or less off shore, this should bring the western eyewall onshore assuming these exact forecasts verify.


Any eye wall is obviously bad, but rather the western eye wall than having it go up the spine and be in the NE quadrant of the eyewall. Just my $0.02


so if the euro is right and south fl get the western eye will it still have cat 4 winds thanks 8-)
0 likes   

NFLnut
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:37 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7882 Postby NFLnut » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:12 am

USTropics wrote:Someone mentioned this earlier, that because of the unique geometrical shape of Florida, just slight deviations in track guidance seem like huge shifts. In fact, a slight adjustment 50-100 miles east or west (which is well within range of the positional error of models even after 96 hours) has huge implications in impact. Makes it quite messy for evacuation procedures as well (i.e. larger area of land mass under potential threat now = more people needing to be evacuated).



I believe it was just a 16 mile correction to the east that made Matthew a lot less damaging to a lot of Florida last year. Even a little nudge can make a HUGE difference!
2 likes   

LarryWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6246
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7883 Postby LarryWx » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:12 am

The 0Z Euro track would give CHS about the worst of the storm surge with the movement of the center NNW into the coast ~25 miles SW of them on Mon evening based on the closeup maps that I have. SAV, though hit with a bit heavier rain (8") than CHS (6 "), wouldn't get near the storm surge CHS would get.
I know it is very early to pin down the time of landfall. However, I will say that IF the 0Z Euro were to play out, the center would be approaching CHS at low tide, a big help. Low tide is then around 8 PM. How important are the tides? Low tide is 6 feet lower than high tide in CHS.

Regardless and most importantly, this run tells me that the eastward trend is in play now and further eastward track adjustments are quite possible later today
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

MatthewsRevenge

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7884 Postby MatthewsRevenge » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:12 am

SapphireSea wrote:The piece of energy that has materialized and likely going to be the factor that will turn Irma much like Matthew is leaving Alberta and ready to dive into place. Because the feature exists and movement looks pretty perfect, looks like more east shifts will materialize.

Will have to see if the trough does anything funny like lift out even further or if the short weakens / does not move as far east as fast as Irma. Pretty complicated, but I think Florida's chances are down and dropping very fast for landfall. Impacts likely less than advertised if it stays to the east. We can see the W side of the storm is not very powerful.


Don't get your hopes up, we still got until Friday for Florida's path. Once Friday comes, we'll finally see where it really goes.
Last edited by MatthewsRevenge on Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3323
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7885 Postby fci » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:14 am

MatthewsRevenge wrote:
fci wrote:
MatthewsRevenge wrote:
Yeah this thing is definitely gonna make a FL landfall. I'm almost convinced of it. I think Euro, UK and GFS are still having errors on where this goes. I mean yeah it could definitely land at SE FL, but I don't see how it totally misses landfall. Florida is still in the crossfires of this. So yeah this is definitely "not better".


Maybe not. It could ride up the coast 50-100 miles offshore not too unlike Matthew did.
The trend is our friend so a model run here and there doesn't assure anything but as a resident of Palm Beach County, I would be happier to see Irma to my East than the same distance to my West.


Not if it continues to grow in size. You can still get some nasty wind gusts and rain from Irma even with the hurricane far from WPB.


Good point since we haven't had a storm as strong as Irma in a long time. But I am a slave to climatology and history and don't recall serious issues with storms that have passed to the East. Hurricane Force winds are up to 60 miles from the center so it would be a relatively close call on the short side of my 50-100 mile scenario. I'm pretty confident that NOT being on the dirty (East) side would make a huge difference.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7886 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:14 am

NFLnut wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
sponger wrote:A much better result for Florida. Worse for GA, NC/SC


I'm not sure it's a better result for the SE Fla metro areas though..the three major globals either have a landfall or pass 30 miles or less off shore, this should bring the western eyewall onshore assuming these exact forecasts verify.


Any eye wall is obviously bad, but rather the western eye wall than having it go up the spine and be in the NE quadrant of the eyewall. Just my $0.02


I agree but a landfall in Ft.Myers/Naples like the 12z Euro had wasn't going to put the SE Fla metro area in the eyewall at all. These east coast runs are bringing the eyewall onshore SE Fla..besides we all know the forecast from the models won't be dead on...could still be 100 miles east or west.
0 likes   

brghteys1216
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 118
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:35 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7887 Postby brghteys1216 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:16 am

Would the east side still likely be in play should Irma not pick up speed?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
I'm just an enthusiast and weather fan and any comments I make are just my opinion and are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

joey
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:11 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7888 Postby joey » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:18 am

Bocadude85 wrote:
NFLnut wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
I'm not sure it's a better result for the SE Fla metro areas though..the three major globals either have a landfall or pass 30 miles or less off shore, this should bring the western eyewall onshore assuming these exact forecasts verify.


Any eye wall is obviously bad, but rather the western eye wall than having it go up the spine and be in the NE quadrant of the eyewall. Just my $0.02


I agree but a landfall in Ft.Myers/Naples like the 12z Euro had wasn't going to put the SE Fla metro area in the eyewall at all. These east coast runs are bringing the eyewall onshore SE Fla..besides we all know the forecast from the models won't be dead on...could still be 100 miles east or west.


agree and after the euro run the 5 am cone might shift right with the symbol plot right on fl on the middle 8-) imo
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7889 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:18 am

fci wrote:
MatthewsRevenge wrote:
fci wrote:
Maybe not. It could ride up the coast 50-100 miles offshore not too unlike Matthew did.
The trend is our friend so a model run here and there doesn't assure anything but as a resident of Palm Beach County, I would be happier to see Irma to my East than the same distance to my West.


Not if it continues to grow in size. You can still get some nasty wind gusts and rain from Irma even with the hurricane far from WPB.


Good point since we haven't had a storm as strong as Irma in a long time. But I am a slave to climatology and history and don't recall serious issues with storms that have passed to the East. Hurricane Force winds are up to 60 miles from the center so it would be a relatively close call on the short side of my 50-100 mile scenario. I'm pretty confident that NOT being on the dirty (East) side would make a huge difference.


I'm a huge climatology person also, if Irma passes west of Andros Island coming from the east or southeast then I would say a Fla landfall drastically increases since I have not been able to find a hurricane that missed Florida to the East that passed west of Andros.
Last edited by Bocadude85 on Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

NFLnut
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:37 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7890 Postby NFLnut » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:18 am

Bocadude85 wrote:
NFLnut wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
I'm not sure it's a better result for the SE Fla metro areas though..the three major globals either have a landfall or pass 30 miles or less off shore, this should bring the western eyewall onshore assuming these exact forecasts verify.


Any eye wall is obviously bad, but rather the western eye wall than having it go up the spine and be in the NE quadrant of the eyewall. Just my $0.02


I agree but a landfall in Ft.Myers/Naples like the 12z Euro had wasn't going to put the SE Fla metro area in the eyewall at all. These east coast runs are bringing the eyewall onshore SE Fla..besides we all know the forecast from the models won't be dead on...could still be 100 miles east or west.



True about if the landfall was Gulf coast for eastern Florida, and I agree that the models will still make adjustments, but I also think that any adjustments at this point and after will be considerably less than 100 miles.
0 likes   

MatthewsRevenge

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7891 Postby MatthewsRevenge » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:21 am

^ In that case, Florida is gonna go up the spine then with the eyewall somewhere in SE FL. The true story is will it go simply up north, northeast or northwest?
0 likes   

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7892 Postby Vdogg » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:27 am

WilmingtonSandbar wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:I said Myrtle Beach this run. I wasn't that far off. I believe there is now consensus between the 3 major models, GFS, ECMWF, and UKMET.


I'm just glad that I'm not a total crackpot. Now to get plans to board up my business and move my father.

Nope, you're not. All of us who have lived in the NC/VA area for any length of time have seen storms take this path. Even with the shifts west I was mindful it could swing back our way. Still a couple of days to go until we get a first landfall, but the next 120 hours look clear with a turn east of Florida. This is starting to look a lot like Matthew.
0 likes   

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7893 Postby SapphireSea » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:31 am

MatthewsRevenge wrote:
SapphireSea wrote:The piece of energy that has materialized and likely going to be the factor that will turn Irma much like Matthew is leaving Alberta and ready to dive into place. Because the feature exists and movement looks pretty perfect, looks like more east shifts will materialize.

Will have to see if the trough does anything funny like lift out even further or if the short weakens / does not move as far east as fast as Irma. Pretty complicated, but I think Florida's chances are down and dropping very fast for landfall. Impacts likely less than advertised if it stays to the east. We can see the W side of the storm is not very powerful.


Don't get your hopes up, we still got until Friday for Florida's path. Once Friday comes, we'll finally see where it really goes.


I'd say the determining factor will come into play as soon as Thursday. Think though that the models have latched onto the shortwave that is going to dive down from Alberta Canada where it is currently. It's path if you XTRAP everything should almost be in perfect sync with the new E solutions being presented. Only factors that exist is faster Irma, faster trough lift, and exactly what steering flow the shortwave will make at mid-layers out that S on approach. If a shortwave is in play the W side of the storm will see lower winds due to lax pressure gradient. I'd say SC/NC is going to quickly trend up in likely targets.
0 likes   

MatthewsRevenge

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7894 Postby MatthewsRevenge » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:31 am

Don't know if anyone posted this but FL's cone has been spread. I don't think this will change completely yet if the path is indeed eastward:

Image

BUT if it does, consider west Florida to be spared. Still early.
0 likes   

MatthewsRevenge

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7895 Postby MatthewsRevenge » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:34 am

SapphireSea wrote:
MatthewsRevenge wrote:
SapphireSea wrote:The piece of energy that has materialized and likely going to be the factor that will turn Irma much like Matthew is leaving Alberta and ready to dive into place. Because the feature exists and movement looks pretty perfect, looks like more east shifts will materialize.

Will have to see if the trough does anything funny like lift out even further or if the short weakens / does not move as far east as fast as Irma. Pretty complicated, but I think Florida's chances are down and dropping very fast for landfall. Impacts likely less than advertised if it stays to the east. We can see the W side of the storm is not very powerful.


Don't get your hopes up, we still got until Friday for Florida's path. Once Friday comes, we'll finally see where it really goes.


I'd say the determining factor will come into play as soon as Thursday. Think though that the models have latched onto the shortwave that is going to dive down from Alberta Canada where it is currently. It's path if you XTRAP everything should almost be in perfect sync with the new E solutions being presented. Only factors that exist is faster Irma, faster trough lift, and exactly what steering flow the shortwave will make at mid-layers out that S on approach. If a shortwave is in play the W side of the storm will see lower winds due to lax pressure gradient. I'd say SC/NC is going to quickly trend up in likely targets.


If it's a faster Irma, then I agree, we definitely need to look out. Even if the eye is away from us, we can still get some damage as either a Cat 2 or 1. Or even 3. It's a good possibility.
0 likes   

LarryWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6246
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7896 Postby LarryWx » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:34 am

0Z EPS mean is slightly NE of the 12Z EPS near the latitude of N FL due to having fewer Gulf tracks rather than fewer FL tracks and slightly further north average positions (more progressive movement).
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7897 Postby NDG » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:37 am

Wow, that was a big shift towards the GFS the Euro did. Not looking good for SE FL if both models are correct, hopefully they will continue shifting east.
1 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneEdouard
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 11:09 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7898 Postby HurricaneEdouard » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:41 am

I'm not buying the sharpness of the northward turn; it'd be one of the sharpest poleward turns I've seen since Typhoon Chanchu in 2006. Models were predicting an unnaturally sharp turn west-northwest earlier, too, that didn't materialise.

If it turns more gently, it could end up where GFS is predicting while still slamming SE Florida. Much more likely IMO.
1 likes   
You know you're a hurricane nut, when your main source of adrenaline is reading old hurricane advisories...

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7899 Postby artist » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:46 am

Bocadude85 wrote:
NFLnut wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
I'm not sure it's a better result for the SE Fla metro areas though..the three major globals either have a landfall or pass 30 miles or less off shore, this should bring the western eyewall onshore assuming these exact forecasts verify.


Any eye wall is obviously bad, but rather the western eye wall than having it go up the spine and be in the NE quadrant of the eyewall. Just my $0.02


I agree but a landfall in Ft.Myers/Naples like the 12z Euro had wasn't going to put the SE Fla metro area in the eyewall at all. These east coast runs are bringing the eyewall onshore SE Fla..besides we all know the forecast from the models won't be dead on...could still be 100 miles east or west.

But they would get the dirty side of the storm, not good.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3323
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7900 Postby fci » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:49 am

MatthewsRevenge wrote:Don't know if anyone posted this but FL's cone has been spread. I don't think this will change completely yet if the path is indeed eastward:

Image

BUT if it does, consider west Florida to be spared. Still early.


Kind of interesting when you look at the map and 5day NHC location and compare that to the models showing the storm EAST of Florida. Major disconnect here.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests